Jump to content

[Striker] Necromancy Fiend


Nathanael D. Striker

Recommended Posts

[center][img]http://i47.tinypic.com/16aw57q.jpg[/img]
[i]Cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. Must be Special Summoned by banishing 2 DARK monsters (from your Graveyard), and cannot be Special Summoned any other ways. You take no Battle Damage from battles involving this card. This card cannot declare an attack. During your opponent's Battle Phase: You can discard 1 DARK monster in your hand; your opponent must attack this card with at least 1 monster they control. Each time this card would be destroyed by battle: Add 1 Necromancy Counter to this card instead (Max. 4). When this card has 4 Necromancy Counters on it: You win the duel.[/i]

Something I made sometime ago that I don't think I posted. Well, better late than never. So, CnC?[/center]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Err, what do you mean "its own effect"?

Also "your opponent must attack this card" is NOT how it works. What exactly has to attack it? Do ALL of their monsters have to attack it? Or will one be enough?

Other than that, the cost is stupid and an alt win condition is stupid. Safe Zone gg, that's dumb. It needs a lot more restrictions. You're basically telling your opponent they shouldn't summon stuff, after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mugendramon' timestamp='1356662167' post='6103870']
Err, what do you mean "its own effect"?

Also "your opponent must attack this card" is NOT how it works. What exactly has to attack it? Do ALL of their monsters have to attack it? Or will one be enough?

Other than that, the cost is stupid and an alt win condition is stupid. Safe Zone gg, that's dumb. It needs a lot more restrictions. You're basically telling your opponent they shouldn't summon stuff, after all.
[/quote]

1. Forgot to take that part out after changing the effect.
2. I'll make it one monster for sanity sake.
3. And what kind of restrictions would you like, good sir? It was a lot worse when I originally dug this out from my archive. Though, I get what you are saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...