DeathWielder Posted January 12, 2013 Report Share Posted January 12, 2013 So, as the title says, this card isn't anything special. I made it a few years ago, before I actually had an account on here, and haven't changed anything about the card, so it probably doesn't have any place in the current meta, and the picture isn't the best. But, here it is: Name: Fearful Fighter Attribute: Earth Level: 3 ATK/DEF: 1100/1750 Type: Warrior / Effect Lore: This card can be Normal Summoned in Face-Up Defense Position. There was supposed to be a picture here, but this site hates me apparently and posts all my images as links or tells me the file is too big, so I've just given up on it. These aren't supposed to be written ideas, but the pictures won't work for me for whatever flipping reason. Ignore my rant. Any oppinions on the card? Keep in mind it wasn't made with the current meta in mind, as I made it a few years back when I wasn't much experienced with the game, or knew much about making good cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted January 12, 2013 Report Share Posted January 12, 2013 So you can Normal this in face-up defence? Why? There's no other reason I can see. It doens't have any other effects. If you want to make an archetype that supports this, do that, but there's nothing to this card. Also, if you're using this sites editor, save the card to your computer and upload Tinyurl, Photobucket Imgur etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted January 12, 2013 Report Share Posted January 12, 2013 This belongs in Written Cards, not here. Please move this, Koko. The effect is like, worthless. It's pretty much a 17 vanilla. Maybe if it had something like 2500 defense then it would be *remotely* usable, but as it stands this card garners you no advantage whatsoever for the cost of a normal summon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted January 12, 2013 Report Share Posted January 12, 2013 [quote name='Archlord Sora' timestamp='1358012133' post='6118971'] This belongs in Written Cards, not here. Please move this, Koko. The effect is like, worthless. It's pretty much a 17 vanilla. Maybe if it had something like 2500 defense then it would be *remotely* usable, but as it stands this card garners you no advantage whatsoever for the cost of a normal summon. [/quote]Archyboy, maybe you should read ze first post? He tried to make the picture work, but as we all know fixing problems is not something YCMaker is not suppose to do. Hur-ray! Anyways, OP: If you're reading this Wielder, maybe put a secondary effect that's useful when it's in face-up Defence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted January 12, 2013 Report Share Posted January 12, 2013 @Zazu It doesn't matter if the image "isn't working". Cards with no images go to WC, regardless of crappy excuses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted January 12, 2013 Report Share Posted January 12, 2013 [quote name='Archlord Sora' timestamp='1358015044' post='6119006'] @Zazu It doesn't matter if the image "isn't working". Cards with no images go to WC, regardless of crappy excuses. [/quote]He is a new guy, give him a break. He probably didn't know it when he clicked post, though you should always preview first and things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGATHODAIMON BANGTAIL COW Posted January 12, 2013 Report Share Posted January 12, 2013 [quote name='Zaziuma' timestamp='1358015307' post='6119010'] He is a new guy, give him a break. He probably didn't know it when he clicked post, though you should always preview first and things. [/quote] I suppose this means we can forgive him for making a vanilla that offers literally nothing to this game whatsoever other than a new mechanic which sucks because Soul Taker can't touch face-down cards and putting it face-up means your opponent knows it isn't Ryko, Marshmallon, or something that is actually useful for you? OT: Well, if the "Summon in face-up DEF" thing was mandatory, we could give this thing a ridiculous DEF score. No-Tribute monsters with 4k DEF! It would still suck because we have several cards that just stop your opponent's Battle Phase completely, while this relies on staying alive to do that. You could add some effect that would make this card become something your opponent would want to get rid of first rather than your other cards. Or it could simply be some sort of protection to your other cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted January 12, 2013 Report Share Posted January 12, 2013 [quote name='A Background Character' timestamp='1358015934' post='6119021'] I suppose this means we can forgive him for making a vanilla that offers literally nothing to this game whatsoever other than a new mechanic which sucks because Soul Taker can't touch face-down cards and putting it face-up means your opponent knows it isn't Ryko, Marshmallon, or something that is actually useful for you? OT: Well, if the "Summon in face-up DEF" thing was mandatory, we could give this thing a ridiculous DEF score. No-Tribute monsters with 4k DEF! It would still suck because we have several cards that just stop your opponent's Battle Phase completely, while this relies on staying alive to do that. You could add some effect that would make this card become something your opponent would want to get rid of first rather than your other cards. Or it could simply be some sort of protection to your other cards. [/quote]not sure why you are replying to my comment about him being a new guy here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathWielder Posted January 13, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 13, 2013 For those complaining about the effect, remember I made this card years ago, and it is unchanged from what it originally was. That is why it is pretty much useless. I said this in the OP. As for the picture, I didn't think to hit preview before posting, and the picture had showed up as a link, which I removed. At that point, the thread was already posted and I couldn't do anything about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.