nolvorite Posted February 7, 2013 Report Share Posted February 7, 2013 lol OPT clause is dumb, because then Steelswarm Roach is going to be the better choice(unless wind-ups ll) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted February 7, 2013 Report Share Posted February 7, 2013 [quote name="nolvorite" post="6138575" timestamp="1360210522"]lol OPT clause is dumb, because then Steelswarm Roach is going to be the better choice(unless wind-ups ll)[/quote] I laugh at you. This card is a fucktillion times better than Roach: it has more ATK so friggen rai-oh can't crash it and it hits ANY kind of (inherent) special summon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted February 7, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 7, 2013 Hm, I prefer Defense Position clause over OPT, so I'll change it next time I go on a computer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted February 7, 2013 Report Share Posted February 7, 2013 [quote name="☯AixDivadis☯" post="6138707" timestamp="1360240336"]Hm, I prefer Defense Position clause over OPT, so I'll change it next time I go on a computer.[/quote] That'd probably be better, yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted February 7, 2013 Report Share Posted February 7, 2013 I know you're going to change, but right now it destroys itself, why did you make that change? That's pretty silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted February 7, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 7, 2013 I know you're going to change, but right now it destroys itself, why did you make that change? That's pretty silly. Apparently, the "face-up on field" clause prevents it from destroying itself upon summon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted February 7, 2013 Report Share Posted February 7, 2013 Apparently, the "face-up on field" clause prevents it from destroying itself upon summon. I got to be honest, that's not actually something I am extreamly familiar with, however I thought it simply means that in case it was somehow flipped face-down, it would simply not allow that effect to activate. I have been doing some googling, and nothing really useful has come up. I think I need to ask the rulings nerds over in TCG about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DopeShizzy Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 i like this ish man, and it has a yugioh looking pic -i cant stand cards that dont look right. fair balanced effect, cool art and design i give it a 10/10 big homie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.