宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted February 15, 2013 Report Share Posted February 15, 2013 Short story even shorter, I was just about to sleep when I checked my image folders and found this really neat image, so I thought I'd make a card out of it. Now I kinda regret my decision because my head feels so terrible and full of hurt. (No effect below because screw everybody and everything!) (Please don't take that in the wrong context) would run 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted February 16, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2013 I find your lack of comments disturbing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted February 18, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2013 I find your lack of comments disturbing. I second that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SynchroTuner Posted February 18, 2013 Report Share Posted February 18, 2013 The type of card you have made is highly cliched. Double attackers are becoming way too common. Plus, this card negates the effect of the monster battles meaning, and if I'm right, no AoJ Catastor, N-S Grand Mole, and any other awesome card with effect activating during the battle or after being destroyed like Sangan, and the kind. The picture is from Duel Masters called Bolshack Dragon and is great. Overall, with the double attack and the negating effect, it does seem a bit strong. The way you have worded it, the restriction is not of much sense, since the next EP would be of the same turn, thus practically not restriction anything. I suppose it should be "until your 2nd End Phase after this effect's activation" or something like that. 2 lvl 4s seems fair, and the card design, besides being a bit cliched, is great. Cool card, would use it in many decks. I would suggest you reduce its DEF a little. I would rate it 8.2/10. Great Card. I second that. This was awesome and made me laugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.