Ren✧ Posted March 2, 2013 Report Share Posted March 2, 2013 Honestly, I can't tell if this card would be any use at all... This card cannot be used as an Xyz Material Monster. When this card is Summoned; Look at your opponent's Extra Deck; Reveal1 Xyz Monster. If this card is destroyed; Banish all monsters from your opponent's Extra Deck with the same name as the revealed monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted March 2, 2013 Report Share Posted March 2, 2013 Monsters in the Extra Deck cannot be targeted as they are not public information. This could be rewritten as Cannot be used as an Xyz Material. When this card is Summoned: Look at your opponent's Extra Deck; reveal 1 Xyz Monster from it. If this card is destroyed: Banish a monster with the same name as the revealed card from your opponent's Extra Deck. Anyways, it draws a little support but it's generally not useful. You have to let it get destroyed, which is usually a net card loss just to take away 1 opposing option. The only thing you have a chance of denting is an Xyz Monster of which there are not multiples (Zenmaity, Utopia Ray). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ren✧ Posted March 2, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2013 Monsters in the Extra Deck cannot be targeted as they are not public information. This could be rewritten as Anyways, it draws a little support but it's generally not useful. You have to let it get destroyed, which is usually a net card loss just to take away 1 opposing option. The only thing you have a chance of denting is an Xyz Monster of which there are not multiples (Zenmaity, Utopia Ray). Yeah it seems to be a recurring problem for my anti-Xyz cards, getting rid of one card isn't good enough but getting rid of possibly 3 is too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted March 2, 2013 Report Share Posted March 2, 2013 Why is getting rid of 3 too much? Just get rid of all Xyzes with the same name in their X-tra Deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ren✧ Posted March 2, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2013 Why is getting rid of 3 too much? Just get rid of all Xyzes with the same name in their X-tra Deck. Well the last time I tried to have a card like that, I was told it was overpowered, so I tried to stay aware from that. Would it really be balanced? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L0SS Posted March 2, 2013 Report Share Posted March 2, 2013 Well the last time I tried to have a card like that, I was told it was overpowered, so I tried to stay aware from that. Would it really be balanced? in my opinion, no. Getting rid of all three of your likely most useful/powerful Xyzs seems a little much. What would happen if the targeted monster was then summoned? Would the effect still apply? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ren✧ Posted March 2, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2013 in my opinion, no. Getting rid of all three of your likely most useful/powerful Xyzs seems a little much. What would happen if the targeted monster was then summoned? Would the effect still apply? hmm...perhaps I could say from the Extra Deck, meaning that your opponent would still have a chance to summon them out and save their monster. Would that perhaps balance it out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L0SS Posted March 2, 2013 Report Share Posted March 2, 2013 hmm...perhaps I could say from the Extra Deck, meaning that your opponent would still have a chance to summon them out and save their monster. Would that perhaps balance it out? I think so, yeah. If you're going to set it to three, give them an opportunity to get one out there before it's taken down. It's pretty much inevitable, so I think a partial way out is only fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.