Ren✧ Posted June 20, 2013 Report Share Posted June 20, 2013 You can banish this card in your hand: Add 1 "Raviel, Lord of Phantasms from your Deck to your hand. If this card would be Tributed to Summon a Fiend-Type monster: This card is treated as 2 Tributes. If this card is Tributed, except for a Summon: Destroy 1 card your opponent controls. Up to twice per turn, if you control a face-up Level 10 or high Fiend-Type monster: You can Special Summon this banished card. [hr] A follower of the mighty demon, Raviel, this witch is said to hold the power to summon her master from his prison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OpticalGalaxyStar Posted June 20, 2013 Report Share Posted June 20, 2013 Hmmmm...I like this. Not too overly OP'd, but the OCG (Is that what its called? I think so.) could use some fixing up. Here's what I would switch the OCG to... You can Banish this card in your hand: Add 1 "Raviel, Lord of Phantasms" from your Deck to your hand. If this card would be Tributed to Summon a Fiend-Type monster: This card can be treated as 2 Tributes. If this card is Tributed, except for a Summon: Destroy 1 card your opponent controls. If you control a face-up Level 10 or higher Fiend-Type monster: You can Special Summon this Banished card. Again, not a bad card by any means. I guess its just that I never really used Raviel in my Deck...I usually used a Hamon + Crystal Beasts Deck. (Pretty stinking good; won a lot of Duels for me :D) My Overall Rating: 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ren✧ Posted June 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted June 20, 2013 Hmmmm...I like this. Not too overly OP'd, but the OCG (Is that what its called? I think so.) could use some fixing up. Here's what I would switch the OCG to... You can Banish this card in your hand: Add 1 "Raviel, Lord of Phantasms" from your Deck to your hand. If this card would be Tributed to Summon a Fiend-Type monster: This card can be treated as 2 Tributes. If this card is Tributed, except for a Summon: Destroy 1 card your opponent controls. If you control a face-up Level 10 or higher Fiend-Type monster: You can Special Summon this Banished card. Is the only thing you fixed the capitalization of 'banish'...I was pretty sure that, that was left uncapitalized... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OpticalGalaxyStar Posted June 20, 2013 Report Share Posted June 20, 2013 Actually, on the first "Raviel, Lord of Phamtasms" you were missing the second quotation ("). But, yeah, I guess I suppose you're right...Not really that many gramatical errors...so I update my rating to 7/9!!!!!!! :) YAAAAAAAAAAAY!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VictorSempra Posted June 20, 2013 Report Share Posted June 20, 2013 Yeah, I'm going to lean with OPtical on this, at about an 8/10. Not because the card is bad, I actually rather this card. Quite a bit, honestly. My problem si though...you're giving support to a card that's....more ignored than Neo-Spacian decks. -Hint hint- Maybe if you made a series of cards giving support to the three Great Beasts, though.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ren✧ Posted June 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted June 20, 2013 Yeah, I'm going to lean with OPtical on this, at about an 8/10. Not because the card is bad, I actually rather this card. Quite a bit, honestly. My problem si though...you're giving support to a card that's....more ignored than Neo-Spacian decks. -Hint hint- Maybe if you made a series of cards giving support to the three Great Beasts, though.... Great Beasts? Ignorant fool! Bow down to the might of the Sacred Beasts. Hahaha, JK. Thanks for the review. Yeah, it is hard to create one card support for an under used card. Throughout my 100 Single Card Challenge, I have discovered a number of sets that would be fun and useful to make. So once this is all said and done, I think you can probably expect something along those lines. The part I was shaky on here is that this card has no limit to the Special Summons it can do per turn as long as it is banished, but for some reason I didn't feel like Once per turn was needed. I don't know. Anyway, thanks for the review! Actually, on the first "Raviel, Lord of Phamtasms" you were missing the second quotation ("). But, yeah, I guess I suppose you're right...Not really that many gramatical errors...so I update my rating to 7/9!!!!!!! :) YAAAAAAAAAAAY!!!! 7/9? Is that transferable to an 8/10, lol? I don't mean to brag, but I gotta tell you, that there are incredibly few OCG errors here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therrion Posted June 21, 2013 Report Share Posted June 21, 2013 Pretty good. Basic and to the point. Warrior of Atlantis for Raviel, while also aiding the Summon of Raviel and returning to the field under the assumption you were able to Summon Raviel. It would be pretty interesting with Macro Cosmos. 5800 Raviel with no cost and a destroy OR a sacrifice outlet to Cannon Soldier for a OTK. Shoot, all you really need is a Tragoedia, Macro/Fissure, Cannon Soldier, and this. That would also rape the opponent's field, provided you no longer wish to loop the damage and just bash in for the rest. As for OCG, seems perfectly fine to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ren✧ Posted June 21, 2013 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2013 Pretty good. Basic and to the point. Warrior of Atlantis for Raviel, while also aiding the Summon of Raviel and returning to the field under the assumption you were able to Summon Raviel. It would be pretty interesting with Macro Cosmos. 5800 Raviel with no cost and a destroy OR a sacrifice outlet to Cannon Soldier for a OTK. Shoot, all you really need is a Tragoedia, Macro/Fissure, Cannon Soldier, and this. That would also rape the opponent's field, provided you no longer wish to loop the damage and just bash in for the rest. As for OCG, seems perfectly fine to me. It's the loop that I am worried about. Should I restrict it to once per turn, or would that make it useless? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therrion Posted June 21, 2013 Report Share Posted June 21, 2013 Twice per turn would be fine. That way, the loop is deemed not worth it and you can still bring it back, tribute to Raviel, and bring it back again to fight alongside Raviel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ren✧ Posted June 21, 2013 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2013 Twice per turn would be fine. That way, the loop is deemed not worth it and you can still bring it back, tribute to Raviel, and bring it back again to fight alongside Raviel. Thanks for the suggestion. Correction made! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.