Mr. guy Posted August 28, 2013 Report Share Posted August 28, 2013 Greetings. I'm here to tell you about an idea I've been working on for a while, one that I think is good. It's for a completely new TCG called Obelisk. It features elements from Yu-Gi-Oh, Magic, Vanguard, and even the online TCG Tyrant, brandished in a completely new way. The basic idea is that you have a 3x3 board, with your Obelisk in the center. Your aim is to destroy your opponent's Obelisk and protect your own, by playing creatures and spells. One thing unique to Obelisk is to use your creatures as energy sources by playing them or flipping them face-down. Energy powers your creatures, and spells, so it's essential that you choose wisely which creatures to flip, as some of them may be more vulnerable while face-down. Any and all game information can be found in this doc. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mZQw8CPFMdX9F_g3ia5uDkKj_xVfa-JhtY2QMjqQmtg/edit In addition, me and my friends have been creating some cards. You can check out some samples of what might be going on in the game here. https://docs.google.com/document/d/10vYdr2HL0gbNpza-5Ia7IfFm0Ab6T5vtfVfNaEaSQaI/edit Feel free to Comment, Criticize and Correct, as I will be open to any and all questions about the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. guy Posted August 29, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 29, 2013 Bump for feedback Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. guy Posted August 29, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 29, 2013 Sorry if the created cards weren't public. They are now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. guy Posted September 1, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 1, 2013 I see you crow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. guy Posted September 17, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2013 Bump because new cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.