JamieDeeRaw Posted November 21, 2013 Report Share Posted November 21, 2013 Name: Royal Fairy Arcangel (not Archangel ) Card Type: Monster /Normal Attribute: Light Level Stars: 5 Card Rarity: Rare Circulation: 1st Edition Type: Fairy Description: Master of the "Fairy Forest" ,one of the three keepers of this ancient forest. ATK: 2200 DEF: 1850 Card: Her Role: Anyone lost in Fairy Forest whether good or bad can be freed by her master's command. ------/-----/------ Name: Original Fairy Knight Card Type: Monster /Normal Attribute: Light Level Stars: 6 Card Rarity: Super Rare Circulation: 1st Edition Type: Fairy Description: Creator of the "Fairy Forest" ,one of the three keepers of this ancient forest. ATK: 2400 DEF: 1800 Card: Her Role: Keeps the Fairy Forest creatures at bay. ----/--------/-------/---- Name: Iron Fairy Laina Card Type: Monster /Normal Attribute: Light Level Stars: 4 Card Rarity: Common Circulation: 1st Edition Type: Fairy Description: One of the three keepers of the ancient forest, "Fairy Forest". ATK: 2000 DEF: 1900 Card: Her Role: To protect the Fairy Forest tree minerals from Fairy World Destroyers. ----/-----/-----/----- Name: Fairy Forest Card Type: Trap Trap/Magic Type: Counter Card Rarity: Ultra Rare Circulation: Special Edition Description: When a monster you control is targeted for an attack:Target the attacking monster; destroy it. This card's effect and activation cannot be negated. Card: History: This incredible forest was grown to protect Fairy City with Fairy World. No one knows when the Forest became populated with monsters from Legend, but only the 3 guardians are allowed passage to this Forest, but be warned no fairy ever enters this forest on foot... for traps that eat beast creatures are plants and strange creatures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AzNPaladin Posted November 21, 2013 Report Share Posted November 21, 2013 OCG is wrong and your Counter Trap symbol is missing. Why are these cards in "Any Other Card" section? Theres nothing stopping it from going to "Realistic - Multiple Cards." Activate this card in response to an Attack on any 1 monster on your field. Target the Attacker and destroy it. This cards effect cannot be negated. When your opponent declares an attack; target that monster and destroy. Cards and effects cannot activate in response to this effect. (P.S. People on this site looks down upon vanilla monsters, just keep that in mind.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebuchet MS Posted November 21, 2013 Report Share Posted November 21, 2013 (P.S. People on this site looks down upon vanilla monsters, just keep that in mind.) It's not that we look down on them, it's just because they don't do much on their own, and thus there isn't much to discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieDeeRaw Posted November 21, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2013 Guan Yu: the Saint of War:(P.S. People on this site looks down upon vanilla monsters, just keep that in mind.) That's why I put them in AO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebuchet MS Posted November 21, 2013 Report Share Posted November 21, 2013 Doesn't quite justify it now, seeing that you're slowly getting in line with the Realistic standards. You're only compromising yourself on the possible constructive criticism you could receive. It happens a fair bit more often in the Realistic Cards section. While I'm at it, might as well tweak the lore of the only card that has an effect. Activate this card in response to When a monster you control is targeted for an attack: on any 1 monster on your field. Target the attacking monster; and destroy it. This card's effect and activation cannot be negated. Which is, essentially, a nigh-unstoppable Sakuretsu that doesn't defend from direct attacks. Then again, trading the inability to defend from direct attacks for nigh-unstoppability does make it a good trade instead of a silly upgrade due to power creep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
121092 Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 They look great to me ^^ I don't mind vanillas at all. Though Arcangel needs to be corrected to Archangel. But nice work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AzNPaladin Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 They look great to me ^^ I don't mind vanillas at all. Though Arcangel needs to be corrected to Archangel. But nice work! Uhhh, she/he said not "Archangel" for whatever reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
121092 Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 oops lol didn't see that a first. Thanks ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.