Sanguine Belfry (DMTO)

[BosidusReigns]

                                                

All face-up Fiend-Type and/or Daemon-Type monsters gain 500 ATK. This card gains the following effects for each face-up Daemon-Type monster you control. You can use each effect once per turn during your Standby Phase.
1+ Discard a card: Draw a card.
3+ You gain 500 Life Points, your oponent loses 500 Life Points.
5 Target monster can attack your opponent's Life Points directly, banish it during the End Phase.

[Dog King]

The 3+ and 5 effect isnt really that great, only the first one is alright seeing its easy to have 1 monster.

[Premier Alexander Romanov]

Umm...you do realize that "Fiend" translate to "Demon" in Japanese, right?
Also, you can't seem to keep Daemon consistent. Use a spellchecker when writing your cards.
That being said, no one will ever use the second effect, because the first effect works so well with Dark Worlds, and Fiend-Type decks in general.
Also, is this a Normal Spell, or is it a Continuous or a Field Spell?
And what's with the DMTO thing?
Go back and actually make a realistic card, because realistic this is not.

[BosidusReigns]

Well it's just a support card that helps a deck run faster, a deck archetype that focuses on keeping the field full while milling your opponent's cards at the same time

[Premier Alexander Romanov]

Well it's just a support card that helps a deck run faster, a deck archetype that focuses on keeping the field full while milling your opponent's cards at the same time

Which this card doesn't do.
It gives them ATK and lets them Dark World Dealings once per turn.
And you never answered any of my questions.

[BosidusReigns]

Umm...you do realize that "Fiend" translate to "Demon" in Japanese, right?
Also, you can't seem to keep Daemon consistent. Use a spellchecker when writing your cards.
That being said, no one will ever use the second effect, because the first effect works so well with Dark Worlds, and Fiend-Type decks in general.
Also, is this a Normal Spell, or is it a Continuous or a Field Spell?
And what's with the DMTO thing?
Go back and actually make a realistic card, because realistic this is not.

First off I spelled it right so you need to get your facts straight because you are obviously illiterate, heres the proof. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daemon_(classical_mythology) Secondly the second effect caters to the strategy of the Daemons, not just any run of the mill card, It's a field spell I guess the Image thing messed up but I will fix that, and DMTO is the set name Deamonic Takeover. You should think carefully before openly judging things.

[Premier Alexander Romanov]

First off I spelled it right so you need to get your facts straight because you are obviously illiterate, heres the proof. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daemon_(classical_mythology)

Oh, you're calling ME illiterate?!?

All face-up Fiend-Type and/or Daemon-Type monsters gain 500 ATK. This card gains the following effects for each face-up Deamon-Type monster you control.

I rest my case.

Secondly the second effect caters to the strategy of the Daemons, not just any run of the mill card.

Then why not just make them Fiends?
This additional type is totally pointless.

It's a field spell I guess the Image thing messed up but I will fix that, and DMTO is the set name Deamonic Takeover. You should think carefully before openly judging things.

And there you go again. It's "Daemon", not "Deamon".
Plus, how was I supposed to know what DMTO meant?
You should think more carefully before making a fool out of yourself.
Especially when it is apparent you can't make a card.

[BosidusReigns]

I miss typed one word, big deal, and I made a new archtype because i can, does it matter if it's a fiend or not, and in case you haven't read up on it, Daemons are more like malign/benign gods or spirits whereas demons are purely malign evil spirits. And about the DMTO thing it's on the card where the card set is located, like on real yugioh cards.

[Premier Alexander Romanov]

I miss typed one word, big deal

Yes, it is a big deal.
Especially since it is apparent you cannot construct a proper sentence in English with correct grammar and punctuation.

I made a new archtype because i can, does it matter if it's a fiend or not, and in case you haven't read up on it

1. It's a Type, not an Archetype.
2. We already have a Daemon archetype. They're called Archfiends in the TCG.
3. I HAVE read up on it. You're the one that hasn't.

And about the DMTO thing it's on the card where the card set is located, like on real yugioh cards.

Yes, but how was I supposed to know what it meant? You're avoiding the question.

[BosidusReigns]

You ask, why do you keep asking pointless questions and dishing out even more pointless remarks, it doesn't matter what has already been made I'm making a new card "Type"http://www.thefreedictionary.com/archetypeon my own, the creators of yugioh did the same thing so I don't know why you keep on criticizing my idea. You aren't supposed to know what DMTO means on your own that's why people ask questions, and I have answered it so I don't see why you're still on that subject. And I was talking about Daemons in literature, not yugioh. -_- Btw I've been up all night, I'm quite an insomniac so I apoligize if I miss a few keys, and missing a few keys doesn't even remotely mean I "cannot construct a proper sentence in English with correct grammar and punctuation." I'm a little tired and I've been having cluster headaches all night.

[Premier Alexander Romanov]

it doesn't matter what has already been made I'm making a new card "Type" on my own, the creators of yugioh did the same thing so I don't know why you keep on criticizing my idea.

The creators of Yu-Gi-Oh! understood which Types were actually necessary, and when it was necessary to add new ones, such as when Psychic was introduced. Dæmons could very easily just be called Archfiends, and receive the Psychic/Fairy/Fiend/Beast-Types.
Hell, you could give them the Spirit subtype, which seems to be precisely the thing you are describing to us with 'dæmons'.
But making an entirely new Type for this is pointless and narrow-minded.
Especially when you can't distinguish between a Type, and Archetype, and a Subtype.
And I'm not talking about what some dictionary means. I'm talking about how they relate to the game.

Btw I've been up all night, I'm quite an insomniac so I apoligize if I miss a few keys, and missing a few keys doesn't even remotely mean I "cannot construct a proper sentence in English with correct grammar and punctuation." I'm a little tired and I've been having cluster headaches all night.

You know, if you are so tired, why not fix that instead of making cards?

[BosidusReigns]

Insomnia + Cluster Headaches, It's not like I haven't tried, and I seriously don't see why it matters if I made my own sub-type/archtype/type you're getting caught up in trivial bullshit like minor spelling errors and semantics then say you're aren't talking about Dictionary meanings yet you pointlessly mention that fiend roughly translates into demon which is still irrelevant considering my spelling has a lot to do with culture rather than what you think you know, and I personally beleive the makers of Yugioh have ruined the game with their new subtypes, I prefer yugioh before the GX era when metagame didn't engulf the game. And there is no other reason besides me not really giving a shit when it comes to the new subtype/archtype/type whatever the hell you want to call it, I just wanted to do it, and Archfiends are an archetype aren't they so it has no relation to Daemons.

[TIBONE LUIS]

What a lovely conversation.

[Kwisatz-Haderach]

ok the card isn't that good and doesn't look like a possible real card too...but however i think that the first clause should be reworded "at least" like this:

All face-up Fiend-Type and all "Daemon" monsters gain 500 ATK.

[Sander]

Insomnia + Cluster Headaches, It's not like I haven't tried, and I seriously don't see why it matters if I made my own sub-type/archtype/type you're getting caught up in trivial bullshit like minor spelling errors and semantics then say you're aren't talking about Dictionary meanings yet you pointlessly mention that fiend roughly translates into demon which is still irrelevant considering my spelling has a lot to do with culture rather than what you think you know, and I personally beleive the makers of Yugioh have ruined the game with their new subtypes, I prefer yugioh before the GX era when metagame didn't engulf the game. And there is no other reason besides me not really giving a shit when it comes to the new subtype/archtype/type whatever the hell you want to call it, I just wanted to do it, and Archfiends are an archetype aren't they so it has no relation to Daemons.

 

...you really think there was no meta before the GX era? You can't possibly be that naive.

 

Anyways, in regards to the "Daemon-Type", such a thing is pointless to add to text, given that it's not realistic. If you want to do something with it, either make it into an archetype or a subtype, but don't post the card in RC if you're intending it to be a type of its own, aka this is the Realistic Cards section, and fanmade types are not realistic.

 

Onto the card; the card is balanced, I guess. Nothing really more can be said about it other than that the only good thing about the card is the first effect, the rest are useless.

[Mugendramon]

Girls girls, calm down.

 

Daemon isn't a realistic Type, therefore this card doesn't belong in Realistic Cards.

 

Either erase Daemon-Type from the card's text, or I'll have it moved to Any Other Cards.