Jump to content

Discussion : Nobleman of Crossout


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

yeah i know kinda funny well lets end it here but say on good terms never want to make an enemy am i right? well that was fun' date=' never had an over heated dissction before lol :) :D

[/quote']

 

 

WTF?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

 

you NEVER stated a good point, just managed to get situational things... honestly, unless you normal summon face-up defense position monsters (and that can't be done) shield crush is totally POINTLESS in this format... nobleman of crossout is way better than shield crush... UDE logic: if a card is limited, it's because is better that the other card that do something similar and is unlimited...

 

 

also, please... learn2play chess... you barely moved a pawn...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

UDE logic: if a card is limited' date=' it's because is better that the other card that do something similar and is unlimited...

 

[/quote']

 

Dark Armed Dragon is better than Snipe Hunter. Dark Magician of Chaos is better than Magician of Faith. Monster Reborn is better than Call of the Haunted.

 

In my above cases some of the aforementioned cards are banned (Call of the Haunted, Magician of Faith) but their limited counterpart does the job a whole lot better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wrong' date=' call of the haunted > monster reborn

[/quote']

 

Yeah because a card that sits useless on the field for one turn and is limited to only your graveyard, is better than one that can lucksack you into victory that doesn't discriminate against graveyards.

 

Stop plz.

 

 

no, because a card that you can activate during your opponent's turn and combine with some special monsters (jinzo, wildheart, sangan) is better that a card that only brings monsters on your turn, independant the grave...

 

your point is??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wrong' date=' call of the haunted > monster reborn

[/quote']

 

Yeah because a card that sits useless on the field for one turn and is limited to only your graveyard, is better than one that can lucksack you into victory that doesn't discriminate against graveyards.

 

Stop plz.

 

 

no, because a card that you can activate during your opponent's turn and combine with some special monsters (jinzo, wildheart, sangan) is better that a card that only brings monsters on your turn, independant the grave...

 

your point is??

 

So wait. Because it's chainable (Trap) makes it better than Monster Reborn?

 

What kind of logic is that?

 

Oh wow I can chain it on Jinzo so that it gets a free visit! Oh wait, I can Monster Reborn my opponent's Dark Magician of Chaos, and now Monster Reborn my Jinzo.

 

If you honestly think that because Call of the Haunted can be chained on Mystical Space Typhoon, or on Heavy Storm makes it better, you should re-evaluate your logic.

 

Monster Reborn is leagues ahead of Call of the Haunted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wrong' date=' call of the haunted > monster reborn

[/quote']

 

Yeah because a card that sits useless on the field for one turn and is limited to only your graveyard, is better than one that can lucksack you into victory that doesn't discriminate against graveyards.

 

Stop plz.

 

 

no, because a card that you can activate during your opponent's turn and combine with some special monsters (jinzo, wildheart, sangan) is better that a card that only brings monsters on your turn, independant the grave...

 

your point is??

 

but it's a spell and can be used to get a card from your opponents graveyard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...