Canadian Posted February 23, 2014 Report Share Posted February 23, 2014 Apparently there are people who think this card should be hit. lmao Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted February 23, 2014 Report Share Posted February 23, 2014 Waaaaaaay too situational to be good. It'd be dead even against something like Fire Fist that loves controlling 2-3 continuous cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Ash Posted February 23, 2014 Report Share Posted February 23, 2014 Card causes a ridiculous amounts of blowouts and is a side-deck staple for me atm. So good vs Gears and FF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted February 23, 2014 Report Share Posted February 23, 2014 I love this just for gits and shiggles. It would be so much more legit against FF if it was 3 face-ups and 2 sets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jord200 Posted February 23, 2014 Report Share Posted February 23, 2014 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0GuXMPoyhs I had to. OT- They was a guy at my locals yesterday who sounded like he would sell his soul for a playset of these. I don't see why he wanted to spend $30 on it.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
·Toot Posted February 23, 2014 Report Share Posted February 23, 2014 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0GuXMPoyhs I had to. OT- They was a guy at my locals yesterday who sounded like he would sell his soul for a playset of these. I don't see why he wanted to spend $30 on it.... I hate that show so much lol. OT: It totally should be banned. Especially if your opponent can have Skill Drain and Gates of Dark World face-up. I bet the rest of those sets are those wacky viruses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted February 23, 2014 Report Share Posted February 23, 2014 They don't have to be controlled by the opponent, Artifact shenanigans? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted February 23, 2014 Report Share Posted February 23, 2014 Apparently there are people who think this card should be hit.I'm really curious about this now.Link? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted February 23, 2014 Report Share Posted February 23, 2014 I'm really curious about this now. Link? http://www.duelingnetwork.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted February 24, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 http://duelistgroundz.com/index.php?showtopic=158687&page=1 Page 6. And this is duelistgroundz of all places. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 http://duelistgroundz.com/index.php?showtopic=158687&page=1 Page 6. And this is duelistgroundz of all places. I thought Dueling Network was bad. Geez and people are agreeing with it. I am done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazooie Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 http://duelistgroundz.com/index.php?showtopic=158687&page=1 Page 6. And this is duelistgroundz of all places. The point they made about the Pendulum Monsters actually seems pretty valid to me. Once Pendulum cards start getting up to scratch, if they count as on the field (And I can't imagine why they wouldn't), Full House does actually seem like it would be a pretty viable and a lot more powerful choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 The point they made about the Pendulum Monsters actually seems pretty valid to me. Once Pendulum cards start getting up to scratch, if they count as on the field (And I can't imagine why they wouldn't), Full House does actually seem like it would be a pretty viable and a lot more powerful choice. I agree, that was somewhat viable. Also it doesn't say the targets have to be the opponent's. I think you could get a bit gimmicky with it. But ban it? Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delibirb Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 Well to be honest I didnt know this even existed and now I want to try it in everything. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Ash Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 They said to hit it, and while that may be extreme it is currently a commonly used card in the meta that causes huge momentum swings and can threaten to blow-out your opponent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 They said to hit it, and while that may be extreme it is currently a commonly used card in the meta that causes huge momentum swings and can threaten to blow-out your opponent. I don't see anyone playing this. Ever. And I've dueled plenty of people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog King Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 I don't see anyone playing this. Ever. And I've dueled plenty of people. This is used in the side deck, something apparently you don't think should be used so we don't expect you to be doing matches anyways... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 This is used in the side deck, something apparently you don't think should be used so we don't expect you to be doing matches anyways... ...I have my reasons, but that aside. I duel in matches. I duel with people who duel in matches. I don't see this used. People have better cards to use in the side deck. Not saying it's a bad card, it's just not used often (at least by what I have seen). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog King Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 Its because you dont run 4 axis..... also this could be mained in fire fist/fire king too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Ash Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 The guy who won YCS Berlin with Mermail also sided 2 Full House. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog King Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 The guy who won YCS Berlin with Mermail also sided 2 Full House. where did you find the deck? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Ash Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1Tfc5G5JPs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog King Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1Tfc5G5JPs can u give me list, or is there a list anywhere for it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Ash Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 Monsters: 3 Linde 3 Teus 3 PIke 3 Gunde 1 Turge 1 Megalo 1 Leed 1 Abyssocea 2 Marksman 1 Infantry 1 Dragoons 2 Aqua Spirit 1 Tidal Spells: 3 Mystical Space Typhoon 2 Forbidden Lance Traps: 3 Sphere 1 Squall 2 Breakthrough Skill 3 Reckless Greed 1 Bottomless Trap Hole 1 Solemn Warning 1 Torrential Tribute Extra Deck 2 Bahamut Shark 2 Trite 1 Lavalva Chain 1 Leviair 1 Cowboy 1 Dweller 1 101 1 Exciton 1Gaios 1 Big Eye 1 Dracossack 1 Scrap Dragon Side Deck: 3 Maxx “C” 3 Light Imprisoning Mirror 2 Full House 2 Effect Veiler 2 Debunk 2 Overworked 1 Jinzo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixty Posted February 24, 2014 Report Share Posted February 24, 2014 I'm still holding all the cards. And they're all Full Houses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.