JLF800 Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 That last effect is outright idiotic. Who cares if it looses it's effect and cant attack. You can still use it to make other monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLF800 Posted May 9, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 BAD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFMegamanlan Posted May 10, 2014 Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 The general pop is OP. Because this card SS's, Pops a Card, Gains ATK then also can SS another Monster? Sorry, but that's just broken. I would drop it to LV4, drop the SS and ATK gain ability and make the ATK of the SS'd monster be less (like 2000 or so) and let it have its effect but be from the Hand. (Most Beast-type's don't have all that many of effects that you'd need to be concerned of (as most are either Battle effects or not worth that much). I'd also drop its ATK and DEF down so it won't be easy to pull off the destroy ability. Also for OCG Grammar: "If you control no cards: You can Special Summon this card (from your Hand). If this card Destroys a Monster by Battle: Target 1 Card in play: Destroy that target. Once per turn: you can Discard 1 Spell Card: This card gains 1000 ATK. You can Banish this card from your Graveyard: Special Summon 1 Beast-type Monster from your Deck with 2400 or less ATK. It cannot attack this turn and it's effects are negated." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted May 10, 2014 Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 Also for OCG Grammar: "If you control no cards: You can Special Summon this card (from your Hand). If this card Destroys a Monster by Battle: Target 1 Card in play: Destroy that target. Once per turn: you can Discard 1 Spell Card: This card gains 1000 ATK. You can Banish this card from your Graveyard: Special Summon 1 Beast-type Monster from your Deck with 2400 or less ATK. It cannot attack this turn and it's effects are negated." Please not do this if you're the one who f***ing need it too If you control no cards, you can Special Summon this card (from your Hand). If this card destroys a monster by battle: Target 1 card on the field; destroy that target. Once per turn: You can discard 1 Spell Card; this card gains 1000 ATK. You can Banish this card from your Graveyard: Special Summon 1 Beast-type Monster from your Deck with 2400 or less ATK. It cannot attack this turn and it's effects are negated. just treat this as nothing and balanced it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFMegamanlan Posted May 10, 2014 Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 *cough* Mine wasn't horrid, just some capitalization things. And in general, if you don't have the last part of the card (change it to balance it more as I've suggested) the card isn't worth running. If it's like a Stygian Street Patrol it's okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted May 10, 2014 Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 *cough* Mine wasn't horrid, just some capitalization things. And in general, if you don't have the last part of the card (change it to balance it more as I've suggested) the card isn't worth running. If it's like a Stygian Street Patrol it's okay. So, just a 2950 beater that can pop a card and has a possibility to not eat up NS isn't good enough? The last effect is very poor design to say at least Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFMegamanlan Posted May 10, 2014 Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 It's 1950. Come on it's like saying that Dragon Queen is awesome because it lets you draw and doesn't take up a Normal. (And like most decks would waste a Spell to give this 1k ATK for a turn) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iC RiskQ Posted May 10, 2014 Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 Why not just make the card so that you can only activate only 1 of the effects only once that turn? I mean, this card is insane as it is already and I think it should at least have that thing where you can only use ONE of the effects that it has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLF800 Posted May 10, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 Ok guys I knew it was OP but I guess too much. I really need to get my cards right. All my other cards are balanced but people state how they aren't useful enough. And thanks Aqua Hina for pointing out that Megamanlan's grammar correction was incorrect. I have never seen grammar stating to target a card in play. I mean that's worse than my grammar tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFMegamanlan Posted May 10, 2014 Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 There are a few cards that say "in play" which I like a lot better then "on the field" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.