BatMed Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 New Dragon-type Support card for the Fire Fist Archetype, and I think I'm gonna include it in my next YGO PRO Project. Anyway, Original card idea was by "Nexus Sheiker", a member in Deviantart [I gave him credit for that as you'll notice in the copyright corner] But I Changed the effect. You can Tribute 3 Level 4 or lower Beast Warrior-type monsters; Special Summon this card from your hand or Graveyard. When this card is Summoned: You can Set 3 "Fire Formation" Spell/Trap cards directly from your Deck. Face-up Beast Warrior-type monsters you control gain 200 ATK for each "Fire Formation" card on the field. What do you think ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BatMed Posted May 20, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 20, 2014 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krisanderson Posted May 20, 2014 Report Share Posted May 20, 2014 I'm sorry, but a dragon-type monster seems a little out of place in a deck for beast-warriors. but cool picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BatMed Posted May 20, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 20, 2014 I'm sorry, but a dragon-type monster seems a little out of place in a deck for beast-warriors. but cool picture. Well at least it still can be supported with Dragons-Support cards... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progenitor Posted May 20, 2014 Report Share Posted May 20, 2014 This seems all fine and good, but that last effect is just too much. This thing's main role is to boost our fire fists up as much as possible, and with an automatic 3 fire formations just for this guy's summon, this thing would probably be the first target for your opponent, so that they can deal with any other fists on the field. However if your opponent does so, he/she loses everything that was set up to deal with it. I mean, if you set 3 tenkis, thats +900 atk to this thing, which bumps it to 3700 atk. thats increadably hard to attack over, so you need a card effect, but if you even move this thing, you get nuked. That seems fair doesn't it? In summary, that last effect just needs to be tossed, or it needs to be more specified and its stats weakened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BatMed Posted May 20, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 20, 2014 This seems all fine and good, but that last effect is just too much. This thing's main role is to boost our fire fists up as much as possible, and with an automatic 3 fire formations just for this guy's summon, this thing would probably be the first target for your opponent, so that they can deal with any other fists on the field. However if your opponent does so, he/she loses everything that was set up to deal with it. I mean, if you set 3 tenkis, thats +900 atk to this thing, which bumps it to 3700 atk. thats increadably hard to attack over, so you need a card effect, but if you even move this thing, you get nuked. That seems fair doesn't it? In summary, that last effect just needs to be tossed, or it needs to be more specified and its stats weakened. Yes you're right.. I've just deleted the last effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulFlo Posted June 2, 2014 Report Share Posted June 2, 2014 Another Dragon? Argh!!! No!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krakonfour Posted July 6, 2014 Report Share Posted July 6, 2014 I actually kind of like this, but I think the combo of strong level 8 special-summoned monster with tons of support, digging into the deck for three searches AND an attack boost is a bit too much in one package, even for three tributes. On top of all that, it can come back from the grave. Nothing says I can't discard this card for a Trade-in, the CotH it for a massive deck thinning of 5 cards total (draw 2, set 3) My suggestion is either to hit the attack points or to reduce the number of searches it can do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.