Sunn O))) Posted June 17, 2014 Report Share Posted June 17, 2014 Cannot be Normal Summoned/Set. Must first be Special Summoned (from your hand) by banishing 2 FIRE and 2 LIGHT monsters from your Graveyard, and cannot be Special Summoned by other ways. Cannot be destroyed by battle or card effects. You take no battle damage. If your opponent controls 1 monster, monsters you control can attack your opponent directly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebuchet MS Posted June 17, 2014 Report Share Posted June 17, 2014 1000 posts! Welcome to the Rank 5 club. I find it rather difficult to see FIRE and LIGHT within the same Deck - usually it's an archetype that's one Attribute dominant, with the other Attribute being contributed by a splashed card. This could easily go in the direction of the Envoys again, much like the other Theros Gods. Perhaps bump up the cost to 2 FIRE and 2 LIGHT monsters? It will then feel about as tight a restriction as reaching 7 devotion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunn O))) Posted June 17, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2014 1000 posts! Welcome to the Rank 5 club. I find it rather difficult to see FIRE and LIGHT within the same Deck - usually it's an archetype that's one Attribute dominant, with the other Attribute being contributed by a splashed card. This could easily go in the direction of the Envoys again, much like the other Theros Gods. Perhaps bump up the cost to 2 FIRE and 2 LIGHT monsters? It will then feel about as tight a restriction as reaching 7 devotion. Seems fair. Since this actually does something, unlike Mogis. Changes made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunn O))) Posted June 17, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2014 Bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Lez Posted June 18, 2014 Report Share Posted June 18, 2014 Uhm. This card is indestructible and allows you to attack the opponent directly with every monster you control? So just in case your opponent controls a monster of some kind and you just spam a couple of monsters (wich is pretty easy) you will just win the duel because you had 2 FIRE and 2 LIGHT monsters in your Graveyard. Is it just me or is that to much? :D Sry imo this is way to strong. Even though Fire and Light monsters are not the best buds and are barely seen in the same deck - there are a couple of LIGHT monsters that just work in any deck - it wouldnt be too hard to make it there. If this card could just be destroyed somehow maybe? Like..with monsters that have more ATK then this one maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebuchet MS Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 Uhm. This card is indestructible and allows you to attack the opponent directly with every monster you control? So just in case your opponent controls a monster of some kind and you just spam a couple of monsters (wich is pretty easy) you will just win the duel because you had 2 FIRE and 2 LIGHT monsters in your Graveyard. Is it just me or is that to much? :D Sry imo this is way to strong. Even though Fire and Light monsters are not the best buds and are barely seen in the same deck - there are a couple of LIGHT monsters that just work in any deck - it wouldnt be too hard to make it there. If this card could just be destroyed somehow maybe? Like..with monsters that have more ATK then this one maybe? Maybe we should clear this up a little. The direct attack effect only works if the opponent controls exactly 1 monster (or none at all). Once they control 2 or more monsters you can't hit them directly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Lez Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 Well im pretty sure this was meant to attack as soon as the opponent controls "a" monster. But even like this. Its still too powerful imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunn O))) Posted June 19, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 Well im pretty sure this was meant to attack as soon as the opponent controls "a" monster. But even like this. Its still too powerful imo If your opponent controls 1 monster, Besides that, you would need to run a deck that uses both Light and Fire monsters. Bujins with Fire Fists, and that's pretty bad. Lightsworns with 2 Fire monsters? Why? You pretty much have to make a deck dedicated to using Iroas. It's not the kind of card you throw in something as a tech. tl;dr It's good, if you can summon it without sacrificing your deck's consistency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Lez Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 i get that but the fact that it cant be used in any deck you like doesnt make it less powerful. So you want to play him? Build a deck that is dedicated to using Iroas (wich is not the weirdest thing to do, since he's is pretty damn strong) & you will definately be able to Summon him. I mean Exodia isnt weak either just because you need to dedicate your deck to it.. Just my opinion, others beg to differ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustAnotherDuelist Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 There is Hieratic Ruler with Blaster and Flamvell Guard, if you run him it there. Still, this card should be easy to take down. It's like Beelze. All they need to do is bring out 101 or Castel. I'm just not fine with the last effect. That effect can promote way too many OTK opportunities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.