Static Posted March 24, 2008 Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 Ignorance is a virus that's only truly effective vaccine is proper education. Ignorance is the center of all of societies problem, and education is key to eliminate this problem. Ignorant people should not be allowed to teach, or parent for that matter. http://www.marxists.org/subject/education/index.htm - Lenin's Stuff is prevelent. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 24, 2008 Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 Worship the Invisible Pink Unicorn. Now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draco Straybyrn Posted March 24, 2008 Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 Whether it happened or it didn't, this thread is going to be good. Aside from the stupid noobs, whose opinions we'll be disregarding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted March 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 Worship the Invisible Pink Unicorn. Now. Ban Religion. Now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quicksilver Posted March 24, 2008 Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 Flying Spaghetti Monster, anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted March 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 Flying Spaghetti Monster' date=' anyone?[/quote'] Ignorance is the issue. Satire drags more attention to ignorance and doesn't help the issue as much as trying to fix education and eliminate it point blank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quicksilver Posted March 24, 2008 Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 what is real? what is reality? is there something in nothing? Religion might be a poor way to answer such questions, but there is no absoluteness, and therefore no true way to determine ignorance and intelligence. Acceptance, rather than elimination, is the only true way to deal with ignorance. If you don't place judgment, someone else will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted March 24, 2008 Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 I can't remember the rules for burden of proof. Is the burden of proof on the Holocaust-deniers, or the Holocaust-supporters? Or is it both? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 24, 2008 Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 I can't remember the rules for burden of proof. Is the burden of proof on the Holocaust-deniers' date=' or the Holocaust-supporters? Or is it both?[/quote'] I think that, based on the principle of Russell's Teacup, burden of proof lies on the supporters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted March 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 what is real? what is reality? is there something in nothing? Religion might be a poor way to answer such questions' date=' but there is no absoluteness, and therefore no true way to determine ignorance and intelligence. Acceptance, rather than elimination, is the only true way to deal with ignorance. If you don't place judgment, someone else will.[/quote'] And then we all become what we should not. People who deny the truth are ignorant, and with evidence to support it, the Holocaust happened, and anyone who thinks otherwise is ignorant. People need to accept the truth and get over all the other fallacies. The problem with people is that logik's don't function properly in everyone. If they did, they would understand that they shouldn't believe in something they don't see, THAT THEY SHOULD BELIEVE THAT SOMETHING BACKED WITH PROOF IS UNQUESTIONABLE FACT, that fear is a deceptive cloud, and we wouldn't need to have to educate them on how to properly understand how to comprehend and assess silly fallacy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quicksilver Posted March 24, 2008 Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 what is real? what is reality? is there something in nothing? Religion might be a poor way to answer such questions' date=' but there is no absoluteness, and therefore no true way to determine ignorance and intelligence. Acceptance, rather than elimination, is the only true way to deal with ignorance. If you don't place judgment, someone else will.[/quote'] And then we all become what we should not. People who deny the truth are ignorant, and with evidence to support it, the Holocaust happened, and anyone who thinks otherwise is ignorant. People need to accept the truth and get over all the other fallacies. The problem with people is that logik's don't function properly in everyone. If they did, they would understand that they shouldn't believe in something they don't see, THAT THEY SHOULD BELIEVE THAT SOMETHING BACKED WITH PROOF IS UNQUESTIONABLE FACT, that fear is a deceptive cloud, and we wouldn't need to have to educate them on how to properly understand how to comprehend and assess silly fallacy.That much I agree with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted March 24, 2008 Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 You have hit the nail on the head with the last of the 3 comments. Ignorant parenting is causing collapse of society Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 24, 2008 Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 you have a dicatator quality you can only get from a dictator... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted March 25, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2008 you have a dicatator quality you can only get from a dictator... Thank you, but alas... I just state things as solid fact. Read all my posts, and see how many things that may make sense to you, and you agree with that I say, but that some people would disagree with. Someone may think it logical to live in fear of a possible god, because they are not aware that there is no chance (notice how I stated "There is no chance" as a fact) of its existence. Of course, this logic is unbacked (this however, is true, emotion, especially fear, are not sound and logical reasoning for any decision) and false (again, though most would agree, this may not be considered fact to everyone). That may be the last time I give an analysis of how this sort of speak is done properly. Learn it, and people will believe you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyberdude Posted March 25, 2008 Report Share Posted March 25, 2008 Yes static Ban all religon it causes way more problems then it solves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quicksilver Posted March 25, 2008 Report Share Posted March 25, 2008 you have a dicatator quality you can only get from a dictator... Thank you' date=' but alas... I just state things as solid fact. Read all my posts, and see how many things that may make sense to you, and you agree with that I say, but that some people would disagree with. Someone may think it logical to live in fear of a possible god, because they are not aware that there is no chance (notice how I stated "There is no chance" as a fact) of its existence. Of course, this logic is unbacked (this however, is true, emotion, especially fear, are not sound and logical reasoning for any decision) and false (again, though most would agree, this may not be considered fact to everyone). That may be the last time I give an analysis of how this sort of speak is done properly. Learn it, and people will believe you.[/quote']So basically you're persuasive and unmoving of your opinion, correct? To sway others to your beliefs, you state them as if they are fact? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted March 27, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 27, 2008 you have a dicatator quality you can only get from a dictator... Thank you' date=' but alas... I just state things as solid fact. Read all my posts, and see how many things that may make sense to you, and you agree with that I say, but that some people would disagree with. Someone may think it logical to live in fear of a possible god, because they are not aware that there is no chance (notice how I stated "There is no chance" as a fact) of its existence. Of course, this logic is unbacked (this however, is true, emotion, especially fear, are not sound and logical reasoning for any decision) and false (again, though most would agree, this may not be considered fact to everyone). That may be the last time I give an analysis of how this sort of speak is done properly. Learn it, and people will believe you.[/quote']So basically you're persuasive and unmoving of your opinion, correct? To sway others to your beliefs, you state them as if they are fact? Basically, yes. That comment was not directed at you, so don't take it as an insult to your intelligence. Seems like you did by your post with all those questions which seem obviously answered by the above post. (now I really hope I didn't actually insult your intelligence) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.