Ace487 Posted July 27, 2015 Report Share Posted July 27, 2015 OriginalImpossible Simultaneous Existence : Spell (Normal)Lore: Banish 2 cards from the top of your deck: Target a face-up card on your opponents side of the field, your opponent must banish card(s) of the same (printed) name other than the selected card. Card(s) banished by this effect can not be targeted by other card(s) effects. v0.5Impossible Simultaneous Existence : Spell (Normal)Lore: Banish 2 cards from the top of your deck, then target 1 face-up card your opponent controls; you opponent must banish all card(s) of the same (printed) name from their hand, Deck, Graveyard, Extra Deck, and field except the targeted card. Card(s) banished by this effect cannot be targeted by card effects. v0.6Impossible Simultaneous Existence : Spell (Normal)Lore: Banish the top 2 cards of your deck, then target 1 face-up card your opponent controls; your opponent banishes all other cards with the same original name from their field, hand, Deck, Graveyard, and Extra Deck. Card(s) banished by this effect cannot be targeted by other card effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuriena Posted July 27, 2015 Report Share Posted July 27, 2015 Certainly very interesting. :o And definitely powerful as well. While breaking even can be quite situational (though you can actually gain advantage in theory), depending on the card you choose, your opponent may have to reveal not only their hand and entire Deck, but also all their Set cards as well. You might even be able to use the banishing cost to your advantage, depending on your Deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Yamiegg Posted July 27, 2015 Report Share Posted July 27, 2015 OCG fix: Banish the top 2 cards of your Deck, then target 1 face-up card your opponent controls; your opponent banishes all cards with the same name as that card(s) from (where?). Card(s) banished by this effect cannot be targeted by card effects. Well, it doesn't seem to be too great this format, but it could be a great side option in future formats, especially if it banishes from the Extra too (at the moment's it's not too clear where the cards are banished from; I assume it's from hand and Deck, but could be from Grave/Extra too). It's just about balanced since it doesn't banish the targeted monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuriena Posted July 27, 2015 Report Share Posted July 27, 2015 My take on it: Banish the top 2 cards of your Deck, then target 1 face-up card your opponent controls; they must banish all other cards in their possession with the same name as that card. Those banished cards cannot be targeted by card effects for the rest of this Duel. ①：自分のデッキの上からカード２枚を除外して、相手フィールドの表側表示のカードを対象として発動できる。相手はフィールド・手札・デッキ・エクストラデッキ・墓地からそのカード以外の同名カードを全て除外する。その除外したカードはこのデュエル中、効果の対象にならない。 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace487 Posted July 27, 2015 Author Report Share Posted July 27, 2015 Thank you for your advice, I actually thought it needed an OCG fix when I was posting this but couldn't put my finger on it. I had the thought of being pacific to the targeting of where, but I thought it would be clear if it just said: "banish all cards with the same (printed) name." I guess not. Updated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace487 Posted July 28, 2015 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 Bump.Card updated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Yamiegg Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 My take on it: Banish the top 2 cards of your Deck, then target 1 face-up card your opponent controls; they must banish all other cards in their possession with the same name as that card. Those banished cards cannot be targeted by card effects for the rest of this Duel. ①：自分のデッキの上からカード２枚を除外して、相手フィールドの表側表示のカードを対象として発動できる。相手はフィールド・手札・デッキ・エクストラデッキ・墓地からそのカード以外の同名カードを全て除外する。その除外したカードはこのデュエル中、効果の対象にならない。That's not right. Correct version: Banish the top 2 cards of your Deck, then target 1 face-up card your opponent controls; your opponent banishes all other cards with the same original name from their hand, field Deck, Graveyard and Extra Deck. Card(s) banished by this effect cannot be targeted by card effects. You don't need "printed" - it's not used on any card anymore. All you need is "all other cards" for it not to banish the targeted card. Just copy/paste the above wording. Now that it banishes from Extra, it could be deadly against BA or even Shaddolls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuriena Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 I think you quoted the wrong post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Yamiegg Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 Your wording was slightly off too. I meant to quote both posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuriena Posted July 29, 2015 Report Share Posted July 29, 2015 Your wording was slightly off too. I meant to quote both posts. Could you be more specific? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Yamiegg Posted July 29, 2015 Report Share Posted July 29, 2015 Banish the top 2 cards of your Deck, then target 1 face-up card your opponent controls; they must banish all other cards in their possession with the same name as that card. Those banished cards cannot be targeted by card effects for the rest of this Duel.What I meant to say was that the wording you posted is wrong. The "0.5 version" of the card's wording was wrong too, but the OP has rectified that now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuriena Posted July 29, 2015 Report Share Posted July 29, 2015 What I meant to say was that the wording you posted is wrong. The "0.5 version" of the card's wording was wrong too, but the OP has rectified that now.I know that. I was asking you to elaborate on how it was wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.