The Warrior of Hope Posted April 5, 2008 Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted April 5, 2008 Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 If you attack directly, then yes. Is via card effect, then no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b7hamma Posted April 5, 2008 Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 any attack from a monster is battle damage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Warrior of Hope Posted April 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 Thanks both of you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted April 5, 2008 Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 any attack from a monster is battle damage Except for Gravekeeper's Vassal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b7hamma Posted April 5, 2008 Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 If you attack directly' date=' then yes. Is via card effect, then no.[/quote'] No. Submarineroid This card can attack your opponent directly. When it does, any Battle Damage this card inflicts to your opponent becomes the original ATK of this card. You can change this card to Defense Position at the end of the Damage Step. any attack from a monster is battle damage Except for Gravekeeper's Vassal. Well duh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicalGirl Posted April 5, 2008 Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 Also if you declare an attack and use card effect are different too. My friend said he almost lost because of someones ignorance. If you attack a monster with Dark Magician that's one thing. But's it's different if you use a monster effect like cannon soldier or catapult turtle to inflict damage. So traps like Sakaretsu and draining sheild and negate attack would not work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ender4449 Posted April 5, 2008 Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 any attack from a monsters that becomes a direct attack (via card effect or not) is also considered battle damage anything else is just direct damage oh and b7hamma not this time lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mutant Monster RAEG-HAPYP Posted April 5, 2008 Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 what Anomu13 said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 5, 2008 Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 If you attack directly' date=' then yes. Is via card effect, then no.[/quote'] No. Submarineroid This card can attack your opponent directly. When it does, any Battle Damage this card inflicts to your opponent becomes the original ATK of this card. You can change this card to Defense Position at the end of the Damage Step. The "via card effect" was obviously referring to the damage, not the attack. >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ender4449 Posted April 5, 2008 Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 pretty much what i said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b7hamma Posted April 5, 2008 Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 If you attack directly' date=' then yes. Is via card effect, then no.[/quote'] No. Submarineroid This card can attack your opponent directly. When it does, any Battle Damage this card inflicts to your opponent becomes the original ATK of this card. You can change this card to Defense Position at the end of the Damage Step. The "via card effect" was obviously referring to the damage, not the attack. >_> No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.