THUNDER Attribute...

[Lasaro Ginjou]

So, I was thinking, does there must be Thunder type but no attribute. The idea came from the fact that there is Aqua, Pyro and Rock types but they shouldn't necessarily be there at all since there are WATER, FIRE and EARTH attribute. So, instead of Thunder Type, there could be, THUNDER Attribute.

Here is what I came up with. I took the "Pahunder" card for this example. Here is the original

And then, the one with THUNDER attribute:


Let me know what you think....

[Blake]

It's a terrible idea.

 

Thunder doesn't need to be its own attribute. Hell, an early monster was an EARTH thunder type.

 

All you're doing is removing extra support chances by arbitrarily changing the attribute, and your point on the other three doesn't make sense because decks like Gem-Knight exist.

 

A EARTH Pyro works, that'd be something molten or solid flames, like Garnet. WATER Rocks, WIND Aqua, etc.

[Lasaro Ginjou]

Even if you keep the types, a Lightning Attribute could open new archetypes and support categories. Well, I didn't really put much thought or work into it anyway. It was just something I wanted to try in some free time.

 

Thanks for the opinion though.