chaoticjexak Posted December 2, 2015 Report Share Posted December 2, 2015 new idea for shadolls, not sure about the effect though. Shadoll Knight (*) (*) (*) (*)Warrior/effect FLIP: Target one 'Shadoll' monster that was sent from the deck to the graveyard this turn. send, from your deck; two monsters with the same name as the targeted monster to your graveyard 1800/1000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanashimi Posted December 2, 2015 Report Share Posted December 2, 2015 Here 'cause of Shaddoll card . . .lemme see lemme see Umm . . . but why? After reading the 1st part of the effect is "meh" ad the rest . . . too. So you need another Shaddoll dump'd during the turn you want to activate the Knight Flip eff (assuming you already activate the effect of Shaddoll monster that was dump'd), and dump'd the same name? Did you know you Shaddoll has this text: "You can only use 1 "Shaddoll [monster]" effect per turn, and only once that turn."? So what? dump for nothing? Dump another with the same name during the same turn is bad, means you can only activate 1 effect regardless of how many you dump. Also it's missing the "If this card is sent to the Graveyard by a card effect:" Shaddoll primary last effect.Also Shaddolls are Spellcaster-Type (most of their Main Deck monsters), but you're approaching for Warrior? Searchable by ROTA but kind of . . . i was hoping its stay same as another members, as a Spellcaster-Type. I dunno any combo or something about this card, i hope i'm wrong, just want to see what kind of combo this card can do with another Shaddolls? Can you explain it? So maybe i'll change my mind regarding this card. My suggestions: Change type, add the primary last effect (the "sent to grave by card effect"), also the eff is kinda useless and weak, might want to change it t something (like dump with a different names, and can also dump Shaddoll S/T instead just a monster?). But going that way means . . . just another Squamata for Shaddoll, which isn't nice, so yes better change with different kind of effects. I'm curious about the art of the card there (imgur blocked in my pc, cant see the card), i hope it's fitting for a Shaddoll card~Also don't get me wrong, i didn't hate that card . . . it just . . . too weak for a support and waaay different than Shaddoll normally should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaoticjexak Posted December 2, 2015 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2015 ah well. ysee I dont play shads myself so i took a wild guess as to what the effect should be, using the non-corrupt version as a base. unfortunately, that base model is satellarknigh unakulahia, which basically has the same effect as one of the shadolls anyway. and the art is what ive change my profile pic to. could you suggest a more fitting effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanashimi Posted December 2, 2015 Report Share Posted December 2, 2015 I can't think of anything right now, i'm too tired and want to go to sleep . . . maybe another time. Since Shaddoll is good the way it is right now (that's what i think), their main problem is the ban of Construct and limited El Shaddoll Fusion, so yea . . . if you want a support, there's plenty empty slot for it as an ED monsters, not Main Deck monsters (presumably support that can substitute the absence of Construct). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaoticjexak Posted December 2, 2015 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2015 i guess that makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.