Flame Dragon Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 I don't know how I thought of this, but it just kind of poped into my head, so it was an easy thing to do, so I did it. Might be a bit over powered, so tell me what you think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 Inverts are not usually creative and the effects are too bland, you would expect more from them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothKirby Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 Dear God, you managed to make something worse than Dark Armed Dragon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silencerleader Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 Dear God' date=' you managed to make something worse than Dark Armed Dragon?[/quote'] Splendid...where may the trash can be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted April 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 Inverts are not usually creative and the effects are too bland' date=' you would expect more from them.[/quote']I agree, they are bland. i only did this because the idea just poped into my head and I wanted to make some cards. Dear God' date=' you managed to make something worse than Dark Armed Dragon? [/quote']DAD>>>>>>>>>>>>>This. This effect can only be used once per turn and he is a lot harder to get out since you can only special summon him from your hand, and as far as I know, only around 10 cards can do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothKirby Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 Oh. Yeah. I didn't see the "Once per turn" part. Still, Monster Gate and Reasoning will make this card overpowered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 But not as overpowered as DAD. Well, perhaps with the right deck setup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted April 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 Oh. Yeah. I didn't see the "Once per turn" part. Still' date=' Monster Gate and Reasoning will make this card overpowered.[/quote']Why do people keep on missing that? I showed TAG and he said the same thing. Thought so, I can fix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikaeo Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 Wow well i love inverts personally. and those two cards are cards i use in my LIGHT deck but first one is a little op but still good 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted April 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 I kind of thought is overpowered, so I made a small edit and that should make it better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAG Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 Don't you mean "This card cannot be Special Summoned except by the effect of 'The Destroyer Incarnate'?" Because with the way you wrote it, he can be Special Summoned from the Graveyard after he is Special Summoned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted April 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 Don't you mean "This card cannot be Special Summoned except by the effect of 'The Destroyer Incarnate'?" Because with the way you wrote it' date=' he can be Special Summoned from the Graveyard after he is Special Summoned.[/quote']May bad. That's what I ment. 1 more edit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avariademon Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 to be honest even once per turn his effect is a bit much, the creater dealed with bringing monsters from your graveyard to play, shouldent his effect deal with bringing monsters from your opponents side of the feild to the grave yard? or RfGZ? in addition is he just supposed to be able to be summoned by the incarnates effect? or is he a monster that cannot be normal summoned or set? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted April 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 to be honest even once per turn his effect is a bit much' date=' the creater dealed with bringing monsters from your graveyard to play, [b']shouldent his effect deal with bringing monsters from your opponents side of the feild to the grave yard? or RfGZ?[/b] in addition is he just supposed to be able to be summoned by the incarnates effect? or is he a monster that cannot be normal summoned or set?are you trying to say that his effect should be to destroy a monster, if so if effect can already do that. you can normal summon him or set him, but if you want to special summon him you need the incarnate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
v8561v Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 You mus have took looong hour to do this,huh??¬¬ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SushiTheLegend Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 Not even creative...please read this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted April 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 I know the card isn't creative I've said this 3 times now. I also said this only took me 3 min. I only did this because I wanted to make a new card since I can't think of creative effects for my real cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avariademon Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 to be honest even once per turn his effect is a bit much' date=' the creater dealed with bringing monsters from your graveyard to play, [b']shouldent his effect deal with bringing monsters from your opponents side of the feild to the grave yard? or RfGZ?[/b] in addition is he just supposed to be able to be summoned by the incarnates effect? or is he a monster that cannot be normal summoned or set?are you trying to say that his effect should be to destroy a monster, if so if effect can already do that. you can normal summon him or set him, but if you want to special summon him you need the incarnate. to an extent yes to an extent no. i already understand the fact that he destroyes monsters. but in truth what he dose is destroy cards, anything now i know this includes monsters but for a "creater invert" you would think his effect would deal ONLY with monsters like his original one did. even though its once per turn its still overpowered, you can destroy a card on the field for little to no cost, paying life points would be a worse cost for this card IMO but again thats IMO, i could be incorrect. the point im trying to get across is very simple, his effect is to powerful. its not REDICULOUSLY overpowered but it still is over powered. DAD requires a dark monster to remove, this just requires a card. once per turn or not its still a bit overpowerd. like i said i suggest to make it so its effect is ONLY destroying monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted April 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 to be honest even once per turn his effect is a bit much' date=' the creater dealed with bringing monsters from your graveyard to play, [b']shouldent his effect deal with bringing monsters from your opponents side of the feild to the grave yard? or RfGZ?[/b] in addition is he just supposed to be able to be summoned by the incarnates effect? or is he a monster that cannot be normal summoned or set?are you trying to say that his effect should be to destroy a monster, if so if effect can already do that. you can normal summon him or set him, but if you want to special summon him you need the incarnate. to an extent yes to an extent no. i already understand the fact that he destroyes monsters. but in truth what he dose is destroy cards, anything now i know this includes monsters but for a "creater invert" you would think his effect would deal ONLY with monsters like his original one did. even though its once per turn its still overpowered, you can destroy a card on the field for little to no cost, paying life points would be a worse cost for this card IMO but again thats IMO, i could be incorrect. the point im trying to get across is very simple, his effect is to powerful. its not REDICULOUSLY overpowered but it still is over powered. DAD requires a dark monster to remove, this just requires a card. once per turn or not its still a bit overpowerd. like i said i suggest to make it so its effect is ONLY destroying monsters.Well, since he is an invert, he is creaters opposite, so his effect should be the opposite. I understand, but their are only 2 ways to get him out. 1) tribute 2 monsters. 2) get luck and use the Incarnate, so, unlike DAD, he can't be out at the get go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avariademon Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 to be honest even once per turn his effect is a bit much' date=' the creater dealed with bringing monsters from your graveyard to play, [b']shouldent his effect deal with bringing monsters from your opponents side of the feild to the grave yard? or RfGZ?[/b] in addition is he just supposed to be able to be summoned by the incarnates effect? or is he a monster that cannot be normal summoned or set?are you trying to say that his effect should be to destroy a monster, if so if effect can already do that. you can normal summon him or set him, but if you want to special summon him you need the incarnate. to an extent yes to an extent no. i already understand the fact that he destroyes monsters. but in truth what he dose is destroy cards, anything now i know this includes monsters but for a "creater invert" you would think his effect would deal ONLY with monsters like his original one did. even though its once per turn its still overpowered, you can destroy a card on the field for little to no cost, paying life points would be a worse cost for this card IMO but again thats IMO, i could be incorrect. the point im trying to get across is very simple, his effect is to powerful. its not REDICULOUSLY overpowered but it still is over powered. DAD requires a dark monster to remove, this just requires a card. once per turn or not its still a bit overpowerd. like i said i suggest to make it so its effect is ONLY destroying monsters.Well, since he is an invert, he is creaters opposite, so his effect should be the opposite. I understand, but their are only 2 ways to get him out. 1) tribute 2 monsters. 2) get luck and use the Incarnate, so, unlike DAD who can be out at the get go, it will normally take 3 turns to get him out unless you get luck. not to sound like a jerk or anything but still why dose everyone assume that the only way to normal summon a two sak monster is by sacrificeing two monsters? granted i suppose its a bit harder then i originally assumed, it just dosent feel right i dont know what it is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.