Abdelrahman Posted November 7, 2016 Report Share Posted November 7, 2016 Pot of RapacityNormal Spell CardBanish 1 monster from your hand, then target 1 monster in your Graveyard; shuffle it into the Deck, and if you do, draw 3 cards. You can only activate 1 "Pot of Rapacity" per turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EndUser Posted November 7, 2016 Report Share Posted November 7, 2016 You know most of us want to leave PoG as is, right? We like it that way. Having no cards on the field isn't exactly a good restriction for this case. It's like Pot of Desires without the cost, especially if you draw it during Turn 1 or if your opponent clears your field. You could make it be close to bubbleman, best case scenario, and even so it's still better than him (it doesn't require you Summon a monster first). The way the current format is, it would not find as much use, but my view on the card is more general. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leafbladie Posted November 7, 2016 Report Share Posted November 7, 2016 Could make a decent topdeck like Bubbleman as EndUser said, if you made it so that you had to control no cards on the hand or field, but honestly, I probably wouldn't run it. 9 times out of 10 it'll probably be dead in your hand, and it's more than likely to brick you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abdelrahman Posted November 7, 2016 Author Report Share Posted November 7, 2016 You know most of us want to leave PoG as is, right? We like it that way. Having no cards on the field isn't exactly a good restriction for this case. It's like Pot of Desires without the cost, especially if you draw it during Turn 1 or if your opponent clears your field. You could make it be close to bubbleman, best case scenario, and even so it's still better than him (it doesn't require you Summon a monster first). The way the current format is, it would not find as much use, but my view on the card is more general.Could make a decent topdeck like Bubbleman as EndUser said, if you made it so that you had to control no cards on the hand or field, but honestly, I probably wouldn't run it. 9 times out of 10 it'll probably be dead in your hand, and it's more than likely to brick you. I completely changed the card's effect, and changed it into a new card instead of being an eratta of Pot of Greed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leafbladie Posted November 7, 2016 Report Share Posted November 7, 2016 Feel like its usage is a bit limited since you really don't want to banish monsters from the hand, especially face-down, but it'd have some use in my summoned lord exodia deck, so I'm all for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abdelrahman Posted November 11, 2016 Author Report Share Posted November 11, 2016 Changed it to banishing face-up instead of face-down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abdelrahman Posted November 11, 2016 Author Report Share Posted November 11, 2016 Feel like its usage is a bit limited since you really don't want to banish monsters from the hand, especially face-down, but it'd have some use in my summoned lord exodia deck, so I'm all for it. Changed the effect again, if you're interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leafbladie Posted November 12, 2016 Report Share Posted November 12, 2016 You could make the argument that because it fattens your deck, it allowing you to go +1 is fine, but the fact remains that you could just use it to recycle an Extra Deck monster. I'd say it being just a generic Allure of Darkness is better, that requires you to recycle a monster too. It'd actually be pretty useful in Kozmo to get Dark Destroyer back if it's accidentally pitched by Tincan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.