Guest Star Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Quick_Attack_%28GX%29 This card is amazing and if it is released in the TCG it would be useful in almost any Deck. Will we get it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 I really don't see much use for the second effect, and their are better cards that let you draw a card. Over all it's ok, but their are better cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 This card is ridiculously overpowered and would be banned in a heartbeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 This is a +0. There is no Spell Card in the game that involves drawing 1 card that is better than this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 This is a +0. And yet it is still ridiculously overpowered and would be banned in a heartbeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 Is that sarcasm? The +0 comment was a response to Flame Dragon's comment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 Is that sarcasm? No. It would be banned in a heartbeat for obvious reasons due to its broken overpoweredness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 On DMU, the second effect was "Select 1 Level 4 or lower monster you control. That card can attack your opponent's Life Points directly during the first turn of the duel." I don't know if I worded it correctly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silencerleader Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 Is that sarcasm? No. It would be banned in a heartbeat for obvious reasons due to its broken overpoweredness. I think we understand it would be banned in a heartbeat for obvious reasons due to its broken overpowering. (not overpoweredness.)(overpoweredness=grammatical error)The card is all right...but 2 cards would make instant banning even before it would come out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 It would still be banned in a heartbeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 For obvious reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 Tell me and I will give you a cookie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 Figure it out, then eat the cookie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 So, should Allure, Destiny Draw, Common Charity, and Trade In be banned too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 So' date=' should Allure, Destiny Draw, Common Charity, and Trade In be banned too?[/quote'] No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 They give you the same advantage as this card does though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 They give you the same advantage as this card does though. There are a lot of +0 cards in the game. Last Will is a +0. Just because the change in card advantage is the same doesn't mean that the cards are equal in brokenness. Is that sarcasm? No. It would be banned in a heartbeat for obvious reasons due to its broken overpoweredness. I think we understand it would be banned in a heartbeat for obvious reasons due to its broken overpowering. (not overpoweredness.)(overpoweredness=grammatical error)The card is all right...but 2 cards would make instant banning even before it would come out. No, this card is broken too. And Pot of Greed wasn't banned until after it came out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 please tell me why this card is so overpowered? its like a better Jar of Greed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 please tell me why this card is so overpowered? its like a better Jar of Greed That's like saying Ring of Destruction is a better Hammer Shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 Ring of Destruction is banned for a good reason This card should be limited if it was released Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 Ring of Destruction is banned for a good reason This card should be limited if it was released Prove that this card is good for the game at 1 but bad for the game at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 Prove that this card is good for the game at 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 Crab Helmet it isn't the draw effect that makes this card overpowered right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 The second effect isn't that good though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.