.:pyramid:. Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 if Clear Vice Dragon, was release to tgc and ocg what would you think of it. i'm currently using it in a deck based on it and its pwns. Clear Vice Dragon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 I love it, searchable through tomato and masked dragon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 I'd side it for my Tomato Toolbox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Tad overpowered if released... this effect is going to be changed a lot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 broken much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dryad Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Funny Much?(If reading it correctly on its ability) Imagine this:Clear Vice Dragon VS. Wicked AvatarInfinite Attack VS. Infinite Attack As I assume if the opponent's creature gets power beyond what it had originally its going to get bigger against the opponent's attack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted June 1, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Funny Much?(If reading it correctly on its ability) Imagine this:Clear Vice Dragon VS. Wicked AvatarInfinite Attack VS. Infinite Attack As I assume if the opponent's creature gets power beyond what it had originally its going to get bigger against the opponent's attack no i believe the ruling for that one would be be that Wicked Avatar avatar would have attack 100 points higher than clear vice because its attack would double Wicked Avatar only when it attacked it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Let me see...a 0-ATK DARK monster that gains twice the opponent's ATK when in battle with in-built immunity to destruction via card effectsIt will be very overpowered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Funny Much?(If reading it correctly on its ability) Imagine this:Clear Vice Dragon VS. Wicked AvatarInfinite Attack VS. Infinite Attack As I assume if the opponent's creature gets power beyond what it had originally its going to get bigger against the opponent's attack Triggers an Infinite Loop. Example: Opponent controls Wicked Avatar (ATK: 100)You control Clear Vice (ATK: 0) You attack with Clear Vice (ATK: 100*2=200)Wicked Avatar's ATK becomes 200+100=300CVD's ATK: 300*2=600TWA's ATK: 600+100=700 Damage calculation would be impossible, therefore, you can't attack "The Wicked Avatar" with "Clear Vice Dragon". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoPaladin2008 Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 or vice-versa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hyperion Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 If this card would come in real life, it would banned. Seriously. Very overpowered. Also, when face-up on the field, it's not treaten as an DARK monster? lolwut? What's the point of that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 If this card would come in real life' date=' it would banned. Seriously. Very overpowered. Also, when face-up on the field, it's not treaten as an DARK monster? lolwut? What's the point of that?[/quote']That way,it has no attribute while on the field.That is combined with Clear World,so as you will not be affected by Clear World's negative effect,which is based on attributes of monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted June 1, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Funny Much?(If reading it correctly on its ability) Imagine this:Clear Vice Dragon VS. Wicked AvatarInfinite Attack VS. Infinite Attack As I assume if the opponent's creature gets power beyond what it had originally its going to get bigger against the opponent's attack Triggers an Infinite Loop. Example: Opponent controls Wicked Avatar (ATK: 100)You control Clear Vice (ATK: 0) You attack with Clear Vice (ATK: 100*2=200)Wicked Avatar's ATK becomes 200+100=300CVD's ATK: 300*2=600TWA's ATK: 600+100=700 Damage calculation would be impossible' date=' therefore, you can't attack "The Wicked Avatar" with "Clear Vice Dragon".[/quote'] by your logic it would be a infinite atk V infinite atk +100. and by that logic you can work out damage. You attack with Clear Vice (ATK: 100*2=200)Wicked Avatar's ATK becomes 200+100=300 only happen once vice dragon effect while attacking so it would become 200 atk, and stay at that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 You're using it in DMU right? There, it has even another effect that you can negate it's destruction by battle by discarding 1 card from your hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Funny Much?(If reading it correctly on its ability) Imagine this:Clear Vice Dragon VS. Wicked AvatarInfinite Attack VS. Infinite Attack As I assume if the opponent's creature gets power beyond what it had originally its going to get bigger against the opponent's attack Triggers an Infinite Loop. Example: Opponent controls Wicked Avatar (ATK: 100)You control Clear Vice (ATK: 0) You attack with Clear Vice (ATK: 100*2=200)Wicked Avatar's ATK becomes 200+100=300CVD's ATK: 300*2=600TWA's ATK: 600+100=700 Damage calculation would be impossible' date=' therefore, you can't attack "The Wicked Avatar" with "Clear Vice Dragon".[/quote'] by your logic it would be a infinite atk V infinite atk +100. and by that logic you can work out damage. You attack with Clear Vice (ATK: 100*2=200)Wicked Avatar's ATK becomes 200+100=300 only happen once vice dragon effect while attacking so it would become 200 atk, and stay at thatbut infinite is already the limit,you can't exceed infinitiy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Lol wow I can't believe I just saw how powerful it is >_ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Funny Much?(If reading it correctly on its ability) Imagine this:Clear Vice Dragon VS. Wicked AvatarInfinite Attack VS. Infinite Attack As I assume if the opponent's creature gets power beyond what it had originally its going to get bigger against the opponent's attack Triggers an Infinite Loop. Example: Opponent controls Wicked Avatar (ATK: 100)You control Clear Vice (ATK: 0) You attack with Clear Vice (ATK: 100*2=200)Wicked Avatar's ATK becomes 200+100=300CVD's ATK: 300*2=600TWA's ATK: 600+100=700 Damage calculation would be impossible' date=' therefore, you can't attack "The Wicked Avatar" with "Clear Vice Dragon".[/quote'] by your logic it would be a infinite atk V infinite atk +100. and by that logic you can work out damage. You attack with Clear Vice (ATK: 100*2=200)Wicked Avatar's ATK becomes 200+100=300 only happen once vice dragon effect while attacking so it would become 200 atk, and stay at that But as Avatar's ATK is always 100 points higher, it changes. And therefore, Clear Vice's ATK changes, which makes Avatar change, and so on. This is all "while attacking". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos Impact™ Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 personally i think it's broken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 DO WANT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 DO WANTExactly And I think that both Clear Vise Dragon and Wicked Avatar's continuous effects can only be applied once. Don't continuous effects work on their own seperate chain or something odd like that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 hahaha, not overpowered... it has to waste hand to defend it from effects that destroys, but still vulnerable to effects that control or flips, still vulnerable to ATK modifiers (shrink already?) and the fact is not treated as DARK monster when it's on the field makes it not abusable with CCV, and you can't attack directl with it for a finishing move... and if attacks, it's changed to defense, need more proofs that it's not broken?? it's just a one-hit monster... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 hahaha, not overpowered... it has to waste hand to defend it from effects that destroys, but still vulnerable to effects that control or flips, still vulnerable to ATK modifiers (shrink already?) and the fact is not treated as DARK monster when it's on the field makes it not abusable with CCV, and you can't attack directl with it for a finishing move... and if attacks, it's changed to defense, need more proofs that it's not broken?? it's just a one-hit monster... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Funny Much?(If reading it correctly on its ability) Imagine this:Clear Vice Dragon VS. Wicked AvatarInfinite Attack VS. Infinite Attack As I assume if the opponent's creature gets power beyond what it had originally its going to get bigger against the opponent's attack Triggers an Infinite Loop. Example: Opponent controls Wicked Avatar (ATK: 100)You control Clear Vice (ATK: 0) You attack with Clear Vice (ATK: 100*2=200)Wicked Avatar's ATK becomes 200+100=300CVD's ATK: 300*2=600TWA's ATK: 600+100=700 Damage calculation would be impossible' date=' therefore, you can't attack "The Wicked Avatar" with "Clear Vice Dragon".[/quote'] by your logic it would be a infinite atk V infinite atk +100. and by that logic you can work out damage. You attack with Clear Vice (ATK: 100*2=200)Wicked Avatar's ATK becomes 200+100=300 only happen once vice dragon effect while attacking so it would become 200 atk, and stay at that But as Avatar's ATK is always 100 points higher, it changes. And therefore, Clear Vice's ATK changes, which makes Avatar change, and so on. This is all "while attacking". @ everyone in this quote:An infinite loop would not occur, because Avatar is the only one whose attack changes every time.Ex:CVD = 0 ; Avatar = 100CVD attacks Avatar and becomes 2 * 100 = 200.Because Avatar's effect is continuous, his atk becomes 200 + 100 = 300.CVD's effect is trigger and does not happen again, CVD loses the battle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Funny Much?(If reading it correctly on its ability) Imagine this:Clear Vice Dragon VS. Wicked AvatarInfinite Attack VS. Infinite Attack As I assume if the opponent's creature gets power beyond what it had originally its going to get bigger against the opponent's attack Triggers an Infinite Loop. Example: Opponent controls Wicked Avatar (ATK: 100)You control Clear Vice (ATK: 0) You attack with Clear Vice (ATK: 100*2=200)Wicked Avatar's ATK becomes 200+100=300CVD's ATK: 300*2=600TWA's ATK: 600+100=700 Damage calculation would be impossible' date=' therefore, you can't attack "The Wicked Avatar" with "Clear Vice Dragon".[/quote'] by your logic it would be a infinite atk V infinite atk +100. and by that logic you can work out damage. You attack with Clear Vice (ATK: 100*2=200)Wicked Avatar's ATK becomes 200+100=300 only happen once vice dragon effect while attacking so it would become 200 atk, and stay at that But as Avatar's ATK is always 100 points higher, it changes. And therefore, Clear Vice's ATK changes, which makes Avatar change, and so on. This is all "while attacking". @ everyone in this quote:An infinite loop would not occur, because Avatar is the only one whose attack changes every time.Ex:CVD = 0 ; Avatar = 100CVD attacks Avatar and becomes 2 * 100 = 200.Because Avatar's effect is continuous, his atk becomes 200 + 100 = 300.CVD's effect is trigger and does not happen again, CVD loses the battle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 hahaha' date=' not overpowered... it has to waste hand to defend it from effects that destroys, but still vulnerable to effects that control or flips, still vulnerable to ATK modifiers (shrink already?) and the fact is not treated as DARK monster when it's on the field makes it not abusable with CCV, and you can't attack directl with it for a finishing move... and if attacks, it's changed to defense, need more proofs that it's not broken?? it's just a one-hit monster...[/quote'] Ok, listen carefully to the following statement: 1. This card can be searched out by Mystic Tomato. Now consider the consequences of that statement. Also, pay attention to this: 2. This card, in addition to being searchable by either Mystic Tomato or Sangan, is also compatible with both Allure of Darkness and Trade-In. Think about this for a moment. Yeah, assuming you're the one doing the attacking (you probably will be), this will most likely be a one-time use card. So is Exiled Force. So are a lot of monsters. It takes virtually no effort to use this monster. Why does it need to be reusable? It can blow away Heraklinos with an additional 3000 dmg stacked on top. It can just sit there. There are only a few cards that your opponent can use to get it off the field. Brain Control + a tribute monster. Book of Moon. Enemy Controller. None of the conventional destruction tools will work here. In most situations, if a card that requires little effort has to be sided against (different forms of removal), that's a clue that it's broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.