Death7ofsb Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 rate, commit, oh and there shall be more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amethyst Phoenix Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 they're ok, 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanshire Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 The first card is fine, although; wouldn't you prefer to call it "Graceful SwordsWOMAN". Seeing how she's a woman *whistle*. As for the second one; good enough, the picture doesn't fit the card too much, and I noticed a spelling-error. "This card can attack all your opponent's controls once each", should be: "This card can attack all of your opponent's controlled monsters seperately." A nice start, but I'll be blunt: 8/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death7ofsb Posted June 15, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 pst, its a guy and im sueing the wiki for that, those jerks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanshire Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 God, I need to get my eyes checked; I'm sorry. Never mind it, still good for a start. Just make some more; I'll look at them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirate-jake Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 "This card can attack all monsters on your opponent's side of the field once each." Is the correct Wording, As it is the same on Asure priest. Now, what i haven against the second card is that its attack is to high. it seems a little to powerful, it would be run standard in alot of decks, and most likely to be limited to one. So i think, Perhaps just lower its attack, or give it a effect like "When ever you declare an attack with this monster, Take 500 of your lifepoints." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluephoenix Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 eh,6.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RacecaR Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 first off shouldn't it be swordswoman? :D Errors with effects. The graveful swords>wo The pyscho swordsman's effect basically states that he can only attack your opponents monster once. That means he can't attack all of them at once, which is what I believe you were going after (correct me if I'm wrong). This effect makes him Underpowered. 6/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPstaring07 Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 Crabs right...Psycho Swordsman? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RacecaR Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 Crabs right...Psycho Swordsman? Who here is crabs? And your sig rocks, add that Coffee rocks too!!!! O_O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╬「Selatcia」╬ Posted June 16, 2008 Report Share Posted June 16, 2008 The 2nd one is overpowered for a lvl. 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death7ofsb Posted June 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 16, 2008 first off shouldn't it be swordswoman? no, its a guy. but hey if your into that kinda thing... i dont think that their is anything wrong with psycho swordsman, reason being that it cant be special summoned. (goes to edit card and add another card) edit:BAH! forget it, im to tired and lazy to do somthing about it now, i'll do it later Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.