Careless Whisper Posted June 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 16, 2008 Welcome, I feel I am ready enough to make a review thread. So here it is...Please, post one card at a time, those who post more than one, I will ignore your post. I will not be grading based on if it should be banned or what-not, just on the overall effectiveness, creativity, and above all, the effort used to make the card. Grading Scale: Name: 2 maximum points. (Based on Uniqueness and Interest of the name)Picture: 2 Maximum Points. (Based on how appealing it is, I will count off fo blurriness/lack of background.)Effect: 6 Maximum Points. (Based on how weel done the OCG is, the balance of the effect, and the quality and uniqueness of the effect.) You may NOT post Pop-Culture Cards or Joke Cards or Divine Beasts. You may only post Realistic Cards, and Member Cards. I will be looking for 2 other fellow reviewers, in order to apply to become one, you must, and this is a MUST HAVE, you MUST HAVE atleast 1,000 posts as a member. I'm sorry, but that's only my descision. Here's all you need to do to apply....:If you are submitting a card to be reviewed, post a new, never-been posted, card along with it in a spoiler sayng "Here is m Application Card (CLICK HERE)." And I will look at it myself. This card must be seperate from the card that you are entering to be reviewed. If I choose you, you will receace 1 Rep for being picked as a Fellow Cad Reiewer for this thread. That should motivate you 5-Star Members...lol NOTE: Application Cads cannot be Member Cards, only Realistic. Alright...I am ready to start this thread, and my first review will be the first card posted on this thread that does not break an rules....My Obligation, my promise....Good Luck..Have Fun, really looking forward to this....Also, I will try to reiew up atleast 1 card per day...Depending on how much time I have. Fellow ReviewersSbamber.Kale. ~Meti Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted June 16, 2008 Report Share Posted June 16, 2008 Welcome, I feel I am ready enough to make a review thread. So here it is...Please, post one card at a time, those who post more than one, I will ignore your post. I will not be grading based on if it should be banned or what-not, just on the overall effectiveness, creativity, and above all, the effort used to make the card. Grading Scale: Name: 2 maximum points. (Based on Uniqueness and Interest of the name)Picture: 2 Maximum Points. (Based on how appealing it is, I will count off fo blurriness/lack of background.)Effect: 6 Maximum Points. (Based on how weel done the OCG is, the balance of the effect, and the quality and uniqueness of the effect.) You may NOT post Pop-Culture Cards or Joke Cards or Divine Beasts. You may only post Realistic Cards, and Member Cards. I will be looking for 2 other fellow reviewers, in order to apply to become one, you must, and this is a MUST HAVE, you MUST HAVE atleast 1,000 posts as a member. I'm sorry, but that's only my descision. Here's all you need to do to apply....:If you are submitting a card to be reviewed, post a new, never-been posted, card along with it in a spoiler sayng "Here is m Application Card (CLICK HERE)." And I will look at it myself. This card must be seperate from the card that you are entering to be reviewed. If I choose you, you will receace 1 Rep for being picked as a Fellow Cad Reiewer for this thread. That should motivate you 5-Star Members...lol NOTE: Application Cads cannot be Member Cards, only Realistic. Alright...I am ready to start this thread, and my first review will be the first card posted on this thread that does not break an rules....My Obligation, my promise....Good Luck..Have Fun, really looking forward to this....Also, I will try to reiew up atleast 1 card per day...Depending on how much time I have. Fellow ReviewersSbamber.Kale. ~Meti Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted June 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 16, 2008 Welcome, I feel I am ready enough to make a review thread. So here it is...Please, post one card at a time, those who post more than one, I will ignore your post. I will not be grading based on if it should be banned or what-not, just on the overall effectiveness, creativity, and above all, the effort used to make the card. Grading Scale: Name: 2 maximum points. (Based on Uniqueness and Interest of the name)Picture: 2 Maximum Points. (Based on how appealing it is, I will count off fo blurriness/lack of background.)Effect: 6 Maximum Points. (Based on how weel done the OCG is, the balance of the effect, and the quality and uniqueness of the effect.) You may NOT post Pop-Culture Cards or Joke Cards or Divine Beasts. You may only post Realistic Cards, and Member Cards. I will be looking for 2 other fellow reviewers, in order to apply to become one, you must, and this is a MUST HAVE, you MUST HAVE atleast 1,000 posts as a member. I'm sorry, but that's only my descision. Here's all you need to do to apply....:If you are submitting a card to be reviewed, post a new, never-been posted, card along with it in a spoiler sayng "Here is m Application Card (CLICK HERE)." And I will look at it myself. This card must be seperate from the card that you are entering to be reviewed. If I choose you, you will receace 1 Rep for being picked as a Fellow Cad Reiewer for this thread. That should motivate you 5-Star Members...lol NOTE: Application Cads cannot be Member Cards, only Realistic. Alright...I am ready to start this thread, and my first review will be the first card posted on this thread that does not break an rules....My Obligation, my promise....Good Luck..Have Fun, really looking forward to this....Also, I will try to reiew up atleast 1 card per day...Depending on how much time I have. Fellow ReviewersSbamber.Kale. ~Meti Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbamber Posted June 16, 2008 Report Share Posted June 16, 2008 Aww, I wanted to be a reviewer oh well I'll post one of my cards to be reviewed later... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbamber Posted June 16, 2008 Report Share Posted June 16, 2008 Aww, I wanted to be a reviewer oh well I'll post one of my cards to be reviewed later... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbamber Posted June 16, 2008 Report Share Posted June 16, 2008 Aww, I wanted to be a reviewer oh well I'll post one of my cards to be reviewed later... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted June 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 Aww' date=' I wanted to be a reviewer oh well I'll post one of my cards to be reviewed later...[/quote']I'm sorry, I thought you were a 5-Star, must have been gone too long or too man times...oh well, It's my only and final word. But sense you will post it later, I cannot gaurentee that your's will be reviewed if it's not the first card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted June 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 Aww' date=' I wanted to be a reviewer oh well I'll post one of my cards to be reviewed later...[/quote']I'm sorry, I thought you were a 5-Star, must have been gone too long or too man times...oh well, It's my only and final word. But sense you will post it later, I cannot gaurentee that your's will be reviewed if it's not the first card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted June 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 Aww' date=' I wanted to be a reviewer oh well I'll post one of my cards to be reviewed later...[/quote']I'm sorry, I thought you were a 5-Star, must have been gone too long or too man times...oh well, It's my only and final word. But sense you will post it later, I cannot gaurentee that your's will be reviewed if it's not the first card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bury the year Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 I'd like to... It'd be fun! Here's my application card! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bury the year Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 I'd like to... It'd be fun! Here's my application card! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bury the year Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 I'd like to... It'd be fun! Here's my application card! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted June 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 I'm sorry Tectonix, but I see too many OCG errors in that card for you to become a reviewer, plus....An application card MUST be in a spoiler. If you would like me to review that card, please say so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted June 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 I'm sorry Tectonix, but I see too many OCG errors in that card for you to become a reviewer, plus....An application card MUST be in a spoiler. If you would like me to review that card, please say so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted June 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 I'm sorry Tectonix, but I see too many OCG errors in that card for you to become a reviewer, plus....An application card MUST be in a spoiler. If you would like me to review that card, please say so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bury the year Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 I'm sorry Tectonix' date=' but I see too many OCG errors in that card for you to become a reviewer, plus....An application card MUST be in a spoiler. If you would like me to review that card, please say so...[/quote'] Oh... Is there any way I can try again, or is it a one-shot kind of thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bury the year Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 I'm sorry Tectonix' date=' but I see too many OCG errors in that card for you to become a reviewer, plus....An application card MUST be in a spoiler. If you would like me to review that card, please say so...[/quote'] Oh... Is there any way I can try again, or is it a one-shot kind of thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bury the year Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 I'm sorry Tectonix' date=' but I see too many OCG errors in that card for you to become a reviewer, plus....An application card MUST be in a spoiler. If you would like me to review that card, please say so...[/quote'] Oh... Is there any way I can try again, or is it a one-shot kind of thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbamber Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 Can you please review this card? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbamber Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 Can you please review this card? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbamber Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 Can you please review this card? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted June 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 Tectonix55: You may try again, though I can't guantee that I'll pick someone so soon, I want to give as many people a chance as possible. Can you please review this card? 1st Review of my entire life... Now, I shall start with the name...:Though I find the name a bit Cliche and unoriginal, it does fit the card well. It's also interesting, and makes me want to find out what more is added to this card.Which then leads me to the picture...:It is well selected, it has a good render and a rather good BG that also fits the card really well.Then that leads me to the effect...:I doubt that any card would say "This card has 2 effects", so there's an OCG error right there.In the first paragraph of the card lore, I already see a puncuation error. 'The comma between "Deck" and "during" as well as the comma between "Draw Phase" and "and" should not be there. And this card would be useless for that effect if you still had over 2000 Life Points. Though, that makes this part of the effect sort of balanced.The second effect has some wording errors, but not too severe, and alot more useful than it's first effect. But it's only useful for 10 turns, and then it resolves and you don't need it unless you can get it back to your hand and summon it again, which makes any Special Summoning combo with this card quite usefull, but without that sort of combo, it's quite useless. Plus, I spotted a wording error there...Instead of saying "This card gains 500 ATK and 500 DEF for the next 10 turns." You could word it like this. "For the next 10 turns, increase this card's ATK and DEF by 500." Rating::::Name: 1/2 (Cliche, but interesting at the same time.)Picture: 2/2 (Suits the card really well.)Effect: 4/6 (Some minor OCG and Puncuation errors.) Overall: 7/10 (Great effort and I can see that alot of time was put into this card. Great job.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted June 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 Tectonix55: You may try again, though I can't guantee that I'll pick someone so soon, I want to give as many people a chance as possible. Can you please review this card? 1st Review of my entire life... Now, I shall start with the name...:Though I find the name a bit Cliche and unoriginal, it does fit the card well. It's also interesting, and makes me want to find out what more is added to this card.Which then leads me to the picture...:It is well selected, it has a good render and a rather good BG that also fits the card really well.Then that leads me to the effect...:I doubt that any card would say "This card has 2 effects", so there's an OCG error right there.In the first paragraph of the card lore, I already see a puncuation error. 'The comma between "Deck" and "during" as well as the comma between "Draw Phase" and "and" should not be there. And this card would be useless for that effect if you still had over 2000 Life Points. Though, that makes this part of the effect sort of balanced.The second effect has some wording errors, but not too severe, and alot more useful than it's first effect. But it's only useful for 10 turns, and then it resolves and you don't need it unless you can get it back to your hand and summon it again, which makes any Special Summoning combo with this card quite usefull, but without that sort of combo, it's quite useless. Plus, I spotted a wording error there...Instead of saying "This card gains 500 ATK and 500 DEF for the next 10 turns." You could word it like this. "For the next 10 turns, increase this card's ATK and DEF by 500." Rating::::Name: 1/2 (Cliche, but interesting at the same time.)Picture: 2/2 (Suits the card really well.)Effect: 4/6 (Some minor OCG and Puncuation errors.) Overall: 7/10 (Great effort and I can see that alot of time was put into this card. Great job.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted June 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 Tectonix55: You may try again, though I can't guantee that I'll pick someone so soon, I want to give as many people a chance as possible. Can you please review this card? 1st Review of my entire life... Now, I shall start with the name...:Though I find the name a bit Cliche and unoriginal, it does fit the card well. It's also interesting, and makes me want to find out what more is added to this card.Which then leads me to the picture...:It is well selected, it has a good render and a rather good BG that also fits the card really well.Then that leads me to the effect...:I doubt that any card would say "This card has 2 effects", so there's an OCG error right there.In the first paragraph of the card lore, I already see a puncuation error. 'The comma between "Deck" and "during" as well as the comma between "Draw Phase" and "and" should not be there. And this card would be useless for that effect if you still had over 2000 Life Points. Though, that makes this part of the effect sort of balanced.The second effect has some wording errors, but not too severe, and alot more useful than it's first effect. But it's only useful for 10 turns, and then it resolves and you don't need it unless you can get it back to your hand and summon it again, which makes any Special Summoning combo with this card quite usefull, but without that sort of combo, it's quite useless. Plus, I spotted a wording error there...Instead of saying "This card gains 500 ATK and 500 DEF for the next 10 turns." You could word it like this. "For the next 10 turns, increase this card's ATK and DEF by 500." Rating::::Name: 1/2 (Cliche, but interesting at the same time.)Picture: 2/2 (Suits the card really well.)Effect: 4/6 (Some minor OCG and Puncuation errors.) Overall: 7/10 (Great effort and I can see that alot of time was put into this card. Great job.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbamber Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 Thanks San-Meti! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.