01alim Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Thanks for all rating my SERPENT one so highly!This isnt OBVIOUSLY my best cos' didnt like the idea anyway so i needed to move on, lol! [/img] [Did put some effort though...] BTW: Check my others out too, thanks! (my sig has 2 of them) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frlf Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 I like the pic >=] OCG issues tough >_> I like the effect :D Nice work m8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╬「Selatcia」╬ Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Cool card. Love the pic. 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superbull Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 I think "ugh" 8/10the pic is awsome.Got some ocg problems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Nice one. :D I like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ruby Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 i like the effect... but the pic not really Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokemanzz Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Sweet card!! 9.5/10! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Good card! 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01alim Posted July 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Thanks guys for your feedback, so can anyone so kindly tell me some of my OCG errors? (So i can improve)...Look out for my future cards!Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Digital.Simplicity. Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 cool card 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01alim Posted July 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Actually I figured before I move on to make my next card, I need to know the OCG errors here, so pleae can someone tell me, thanks and kindly appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
=aTaLiG= Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 great pic your OCG is not so bad.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 with Skill Drain,that drawback can only neutralised already Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric234 Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judαs Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 the card loses 100 ATK decrease the ATK of this card by 100 for...That's better, I suppose.Nice card, but I think it's kinda... overpowered, Warrior monsters aren't really that much in fashion, are they? :D8/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01alim Posted July 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Thanks for the little help Touma, but I thought nowadays we say 'loses'....Anyone can confirm this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyson Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 I don't believe there are any OCG errors, actually. There might be something in the line of "When you draw a Warrior-type monster, this card loses 100 ATK." because that doesn't say anything about you having to reveal the card to confirm that it's a Warrior-type monster, which could lead to a very easy "well I just drew a Warrior but if I don't reveal it he'll never know lol" situation. I don't know. I like the card a lot. Potentially useful when brought out, combos well with Skill Drain, and can take out most of the 2400-ATK threats used nowadays. 8/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Digital.Simplicity. Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 pic does not really fit the effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyuubi-cloak Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 well i only found one problem with the "fiend ultracyber" well i wouldent actuly call it a problem, i just think a monster with cyber in its name should be a machine not a warior.but thats all up to you. plus i found a problem with you "white luster souldure" it said this card can not be "special somoned" this card can only be normal somoned by sacrifycing 3 monsters. the problem is that somoning it with its efect is considered a SP somon, but its efect sais it cant be SP somoned.i think it should say,it said this card can not be "NORMAL somoned" this card can only be "SPECIAL somoned" by sacrifycing 3 monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01alim Posted July 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 well i only found one problem with the "fiend ultracyber" well i wouldent actuly call it a problem' date=' i just think a monster with cyber in its name should be a machine not a warior.but thats all up to you. plus i found a problem with you "white luster souldure" it said this card can not be "special somoned" this card can only be normal somoned by sacrifycing 3 monsters. the problem is that somoning it with its efect is considered a SP somon, but its efect sais it cant be SP somoned.i think it should say,it said this card can not be "NORMAL somoned" this card can only be "SPECIAL somoned" by sacrifycing 3 monsters.[/quote'] Oh thanks and it's called The Fiend Ultracyber because I tried to make him a superior version of The Fiend Megacyber.But thanks about White Luster Soldier.Thnx about the REVEALLING the card problem too, but i'll ignore it for now since im going to make another card, thnx anyway though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyuubi-cloak Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 well i only found one problem with the "fiend ultracyber" well i wouldent actuly call it a problem' date=' i just think a monster with cyber in its name should be a machine not a warior.but thats all up to you. plus i found a problem with you "white luster souldure" it said this card can not be "special somoned" this card can only be normal somoned by sacrifycing 3 monsters. the problem is that somoning it with its efect is considered a SP somon, but its efect sais it cant be SP somoned.i think it should say,it said this card can not be "NORMAL somoned" this card can only be "SPECIAL somoned" by sacrifycing 3 monsters.[/quote'] Oh thanks and it's called The Fiend Ultracyber because I tried to make him a superior version of The Fiend Megacyber.But thanks about White Luster Soldier.Thnx about the REVEALLING the card problem too, but i'll ignore it for now since im going to make another card, thnx anyway though! any time bro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01alim Posted July 15, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 Just BUMPING my old threads Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noble Legend Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 Love the pic it is quite good, ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.