Yogg-Saron Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 As I am tired of seeing screw-ups of my favorite little pet, I made this.*NOTE* Pic was edited by me and belongs to Konami. [align=center]Effect/Lore: "Red-Eyes B. Dragon" + "Red-Eyes B. Dragon"When this card is Fusion Summoned, apply the appropriate effect according to the number of Life Points you have: - 600 or more: This may attack twice during the Battle Phase of this turn. - 500 or less: As long as your Life Points remain below 500, your opponent cannot activate cards that include the effect(s) of destroying card(s) you control.[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╬「Selatcia」╬ Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Nice. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted July 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Thanks, Demented. 8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonRoyale Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 OCG."...cannot activate cards that include the effect(s) of destroying card(s) you control." I know that's not perfect, but along the lines of that, so it prevents multi-effect cards with one of them being the destruction effect. 9.2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted July 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Thanks for the advise Don! Edited! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonRoyale Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Mm-hmm.Happy to help, as always. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 awesome! 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted July 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Thanks for the comment! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bringer Of The Apocalypse Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Really cool love the pic! 9.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted July 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Thanks Apocalypse! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 The card is overpowered. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 it is either too situational or too overpowered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted July 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Overpowered? Cyber-Twin can do the same thing with no "cost" per say and is only 200 points weaker, plus it can be combined with Power Bond for a whooping 5600 attack twice monster. And it can attack twice all of your Battle Phases, not just 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Mike2084, you are now officially one of my favorite Card Makers! :D The Red-Eyes Black Dragon was the first Yu-Gi-Oh card I ever got and I always wanted to see a card like this. Excellent job on the image. OCG does need a bit of work, but still a nice effect. I'm giving this card a 9.5/10. Keep up the good work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted July 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Thank you very much Saturn! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo-D Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Nice, nice. A great spin on an old favorite. But... DonRoyale is mistaken. "...your opponent cannot activate cards that include the effect(s) of destroying card(s) you control." As it stands, it needlessly creates a redundancy that acts as an unnecessary failsafe for cards with more than one card-destroying effect. This phrase is more streamlined: "...your opponent cannot activate cards that have an effect that destroys card(s) you control." This would prevent any card that can destroy cards you control from being activated. The best part is, it catches multi-effect cards as well. Yay! One more thing: the meaning of putting an "s" in parenthesis means that it could be plural, but doesn't have to be. The way it's worded right now, "cards" must be plural, because there is no article to make it a valid singular noun. To make it grammatically correct: "...your opponent cannot activate cards that have an effect that destroys a card(s) you control." Now, it can be singular or plural. Please, please, people. Don't get all caught up in OCG that you forget actual English grammar, which all OCG is based on (surprise!)....so I'm a grammar nazi. Sue me. 8/10, because I actually feel that it's underpowered. You could use it for an OTK of some crazy sort, but that's about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonRoyale Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Well, be a grammar nazi. I predicted I was wrong, and here you are correcting me. In the end, it helps clean up OCG mistakes. That was a good contribution. Even though it's not my thread, I'd like to personally thank you for that post. It's a very descriptive and helpful post. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3cchiFr3ak Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Cool effect but maybe you could raise the amount of Life Points for both effects. Also, you need a better picture for this card since it almost sounds like a real card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altair117 Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 ya man i think ur awesome at card makingbetter then ill ever be9.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted July 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Cool effect but maybe you could raise the amount of Life Points for both effects. Also' date=' you need a better picture for this card since it almost sounds like a real card.[/quote']It is a real card, just with an extra head. And obviously it sounds like a real card, because there is Cyber Twin. Plus, if you look on google or some other image search engine, you will see horribly done Red-Eyes twins. So I thought I would keep it simple without making it a crap quality picture or noob card. Thanks for the comments as well! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superchaos2585 Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Cool... Nice job... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokemanzz Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Cool! 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3cchiFr3ak Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Cool effect but maybe you could raise the amount of Life Points for both effects. Also' date=' you need a better picture for this card since it almost sounds like a real card.[/quote']It is a real card, just with an extra head. And obviously it sounds like a real card, because there is Cyber Twin. Plus, if you look on google or some other image search engine, you will see horribly done Red-Eyes twins. So I thought I would keep it simple without making it a crap quality picture or noob card. Thanks for the comments as well!I already know Red-Eyes is a real card, since it WAS my favorite Dragon-Type monster. I was just saying this card seems like a real card to me, although there's no such thing in the TCG. This picture isn't horrible but it needs more work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted July 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 I will give 20 points to anyone that can find a better picture than that, that satisfies my tastes; Good Quality, Doesn't Look Crappy, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 A bit meh to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.