Jump to content

Teenage Dating


Wyhe

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If a boy dates a girl at that age (teen) the guy needs to keep it in his pants...

 

lol sig'ed

anyways I think thta teenagers should be allowed to date. There's nothing wrong about it

 

never had a comment siged before lol

but I still think that way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a boy dates a girl at that age (teen) the guy needs to keep it in his pants...

 

Well this is partly true, but sometimes if like lets say i try to make some guy horny and try to do it with him, and like he warned me already a few times it will be unprotected but i still would want it, and then i like end up pregnant and start blaming the guy that he made me pregnant, isn't that a little bit unfair?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a boy dates a girl at that age (teen) the guy needs to keep it in his pants...

 

Well this is partly true' date=' but sometimes if like lets say i try to make some guy horny and try to do it with him, and like he warned me already a few times it will be unprotected but i still would want it, and then i like end up pregnant and start blaming the guy that he made me pregnant, isn't that a little bit unfair?

[/quote']

In most cases of teenage sexual things, they will usually blame the guy first. I seriously feel unfair when that happens.

 

Some girls in my class would just call another guy who pisses them off that he molested her & then everyone will point their fingers at him.

Girls are such horrible creatures sometimes. (no offense to the ladies though)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a boy dates a girl at that age (teen) the guy needs to keep it in his pants...

 

Well this is partly true' date=' but sometimes if like lets say i try to make some guy horny and try to do it with him, and like he warned me already a few times it will be unprotected but i still would want it, and then i like end up pregnant and start blaming the guy that he made me pregnant, isn't that a little bit unfair?

[/quote']

In most cases of teenage sexual things, they will usually blame the guy first. I seriously feel unfair when that happens.

 

Some girls in my class would just call another guy who pisses them off that he molested her & then everyone will point their fingers at him.

Girls are such horrible creatures sometimes. (no offense to the ladies though)

That's because the guy's usually the one to blame. -_-".

Very rarely it'd be the case that Neko_girl presented, wherein the girl would force the action, and then perceive that the male was the one to blame. If that did happen, it's your fault for dating a psycho B*tch anyway. O.o".

2sick~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a boy dates a girl at that age (teen) the guy needs to keep it in his pants...

 

Well this is partly true' date=' but sometimes if like lets say i try to make some guy horny and try to do it with him, and like he warned me already a few times it will be unprotected but i still would want it, and then i like end up pregnant and start blaming the guy that he made me pregnant, isn't that a little bit unfair?

[/quote']

In most cases of teenage sexual things, they will usually blame the guy first. I seriously feel unfair when that happens.

 

Some girls in my class would just call another guy who pisses them off that he molested her & then everyone will point their fingers at him.

Girls are such horrible creatures sometimes. (no offense to the ladies though)

That's because the guy's usually the one to blame. -_-".

Very rarely it'd be the case that Neko_girl presented, wherein the girl would force the action, and then perceive that the male was the one to blame. If that did happen, it's your fault for dating a psycho B*tch anyway. O.o".

2sick~

 

It happens more then you think though, much girls i know are kinda slutty, but well i don't think if a girl gives a singal that she want it a guy is gonna ask if she really want or if it bothers to her if its unprotected, though people mature faster these days and girls sometimes do try making guys horny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a boy dates a girl at that age (teen) the guy needs to keep it in his pants...

 

Well this is partly true' date=' but sometimes if like lets say i try to make some guy horny and try to do it with him, and like he warned me already a few times it will be unprotected but i still would want it, and then i like end up pregnant and start blaming the guy that he made me pregnant, isn't that a little bit unfair?

[/quote']

In most cases of teenage sexual things, they will usually blame the guy first. I seriously feel unfair when that happens.

 

Some girls in my class would just call another guy who pisses them off that he molested her & then everyone will point their fingers at him.

Girls are such horrible creatures sometimes. (no offense to the ladies though)

That's because the guy's usually the one to blame. -_-".

Very rarely it'd be the case that Neko_girl presented, wherein the girl would force the action, and then perceive that the male was the one to blame. If that did happen, it's your fault for dating a psycho B*tch anyway. O.o".

2sick~

 

In a lot of ways girls suck. I went to the movies with a girl, not even a date; just watching a movie, and she started putting her hands on my lap and stuff. A girl trying to make the dude engage in sexual intercourse doesn't have to be her verbally asking. Actions speak louder than words. Honestly, it's probably more girls than boys that cause the happening of any sexual activity. They probably know that they can control us by doing little stupid things like that. Well some dudes, probably not you, or me, or static, or death metal. But a lot of dudes.

 

Trust me, most girls AREN'T innocent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a boy dates a girl at that age (teen) the guy needs to keep it in his pants...

 

Well this is partly true' date=' but sometimes if like lets say i try to make some guy horny and try to do it with him, and like he warned me already a few times it will be unprotected but i still would want it, and then i like end up pregnant and start blaming the guy that he made me pregnant, isn't that a little bit unfair?

[/quote']

In most cases of teenage sexual things, they will usually blame the guy first. I seriously feel unfair when that happens.

 

Some girls in my class would just call another guy who pisses them off that he molested her & then everyone will point their fingers at him.

Girls are such horrible creatures sometimes. (no offense to the ladies though)

That's because the guy's usually the one to blame. -_-".

Very rarely it'd be the case that Neko_girl presented, wherein the girl would force the action, and then perceive that the male was the one to blame. If that did happen, it's your fault for dating a psycho B*tch anyway. O.o".

2sick~

 

In a lot of ways girls suck. I went to the movies with a girl, not even a date; just watching a movie, and she started putting her hands on my lap and stuff. A girl trying to make the dude engage in sexual intercourse doesn't have to be her verbally asking. Actions speak louder than words. Honestly, it's probably more girls than boys that cause the happening of any sexual activity. They probably know that they can control us by doing little stupid things like that. Well some dudes, probably not you, or me, or static, or death metal. But a lot of dudes.

 

Trust me, most girls AREN'T innocent.

Lol. That's different to sexual advances. More modernly, girls use more flirtatious advances to milk us for what they want. Difference. ^_^.

In the case of which gender's more keen on sexual occurrences, it'd be the male. But I might be stereotyping, which is what alot of people here are doing anyway. =/.

But, yes, I completely agree bud, girl's suck, in a huge variety of ways.

O.o".

2sick~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but usually the guy leaves the girl

so I'm saying to the guys: dont have sex unless you are up for taking care of a kid

because If you leave her you look like a putzy little prick, even when using a condom be prepared because if that condom breaks it's hello fatherhood

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but usually the guy leaves the girl

so I'm saying to the guys: dont have sex unless you are up for taking care of a kid

because If you leave her you look like a putzy little prick' date=' even when using a condom be prepared because if that condom breaks it's hello fatherhood

[/quote']

You are obviously trying to debate without a clue to how to get pregnant.

Seriously, it needs to revolve on the producing of an egg by the females ovaries.

Which means, you can pretty much only get a girl pregnant if the egg from the ovary has been released.

The egg survives about 4 days without being fertilized.

Which means the male must fertilize the egg either 3-4 days before, or 3-4 days after the egg's been produced.

You know when the egg's produced?

On the menstrual (Unsure of spelling. O.o") cycle.

So, in short, you have a once a month, one week opening to fertalize an egg.

And, the ovaries usually only produce eggs between the ages 14-60, since they have a limit of egg's produced in a life-time.

Just to say it simply, just because a condom isn't used/becomes faulty, the girl won't always just "get pregnant."

2sick~

 

Oh, Neko_Girl, you may think guys suck in a variety of ways. It's called flaws, and mainly notable by the ones who experience them. In the case of gender, it's the opposite sex.

Wow.

You also have no idea how pregnancies/child raising works.

If a male conceives a female, no matter what, the male is subjected to raising the child.

There is no maybes, since the government forces it.

How, you might ask?

Well, the government takes around 25% of the males salary and gives it to the mother. We're taking responsibility, no matter what. So, shut up, unless you know what actually happens. =].

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Oh' date=' Neko_Girl, you may think guys suck in a variety of ways. It's called flaws, and mainly notable by the ones who experience them. In the case of gender, it's the opposite sex.

Wow.

You also have no idea how pregnancies/child raising works.

If a male conceives a female, no matter what, the male is subjected to raising the child.

There is no maybes, since the government forces it.

How, you might ask?

Well, the government takes around 25% of the males salary and gives it to the mother. We're taking responsibility, no matter what. So, shut up, unless you know what actually happens. ='].[/size]

 

I do know that, but you really think that 25% of his money is going to make the girl happy that got pregnant?

Do you like know how hard it is to raise a child alone, well probably very hard and that isn't equal at all against those 25% you get from the guy. So the guy should take responsibilities and stay with the girl to care for his own children. Instead of running away afraid and be able to do whatever he wants only with 25% less salary. While the girl needs to take care and is been robbed from her freedom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Oh' date=' Neko_Girl, you may think guys suck in a variety of ways. It's called flaws, and mainly notable by the ones who experience them. In the case of gender, it's the opposite sex.

Wow.

You also have no idea how pregnancies/child raising works.

If a male conceives a female, no matter what, the male is subjected to raising the child.

There is no maybes, since the government forces it.

How, you might ask?

Well, the government takes around 25% of the males salary and gives it to the mother. We're taking responsibility, no matter what. So, shut up, unless you know what actually happens. ='].[/size]

 

I do know that, but you really think that 25% of his money is going to make the girl happy that got pregnant?

Do you like know how hard it is to raise a child alone, well probably very hard and that isn't equal at all against those 25% you get from the guy. So the guy should take responsibilities and stay with the girl to care for his own children. Instead of running away afraid and be able to do whatever he wants only with 25% less salary. While the girl needs to take care and is been robbed from her freedom.

I think you fail to realize the impact that 25% less of the money you need to live off would have.

Okay, say, you have a moderate job, with a moderate salary.

getting about $800 per week. (Which is a little above average anyway.)

you lose $200. That could be your electrical budget, your food budget, your freaking rent for all I care. That amount of $200 is paid until the child's 18. Do the math. 52 x 200= $10400 p.a of payments. 10400 x 18 = $187200 of money contributed by the father over the child's youth. Add in government payments applicable to mothers, hell, you could live comfortably off accidental pregnancy.

Add in her own job as well, and everything for the child should be blissful and smooth. Robbed of her freedom? Besides rape, I'd think it's pretty obvious intercourse, as well as protection involved in intercourse, is a 50-50 thing. It's freaking in favor of the woman, if anything, considering stuff she can abuse with it. All you're problem seems to be is that it's not 100% female, and 0% male. -_-".

Learn the equality factor, and you'd see, it's actually fair with procedures to accidental pregnancy, especially in minors.

Need more proof of how easy it is to be a female?

Well, this may be unjustified, but you have 3 reps, and about 10 posts.

I think I may be in the right to assume your gender, which is a rarity here, had something to do with it.

=o. On noes. 2sick went there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Oh' date=' Neko_Girl, you may think guys suck in a variety of ways. It's called flaws, and mainly notable by the ones who experience them. In the case of gender, it's the opposite sex.

Wow.

You also have no idea how pregnancies/child raising works.

If a male conceives a female, no matter what, the male is subjected to raising the child.

There is no maybes, since the government forces it.

How, you might ask?

Well, the government takes around 25% of the males salary and gives it to the mother. We're taking responsibility, no matter what. So, shut up, unless you know what actually happens. ='].[/size]

 

I do know that, but you really think that 25% of his money is going to make the girl happy that got pregnant?

Do you like know how hard it is to raise a child alone, well probably very hard and that isn't equal at all against those 25% you get from the guy. So the guy should take responsibilities and stay with the girl to care for his own children. Instead of running away afraid and be able to do whatever he wants only with 25% less salary. While the girl needs to take care and is been robbed from her freedom.

I think you fail to realize the impact that 25% less of the money you need to live off would have.

Okay, say, you have a moderate job, with a moderate salary.

getting about $800 per week. (Which is a little above average anyway.)

you lose $200. That could be your electrical budget, your food budget, your freaking rent for all I care. That amount of $200 is paid until the child's 18. Do the math. 52 x 200= $10400 p.a of payments. 10400 x 18 = $187200 of money contributed by the father over the child's youth. Add in government payments applicable to mothers, hell, you could live comfortably off accidental pregnancy.

Add in her own job as well, and everything for the child should be blissful and smooth. Robbed of her freedom? Besides rape, I'd think it's pretty obvious intercourse, as well as protection involved in intercourse, is a 50-50 thing. It's freaking in favor of the woman, if anything, considering stuff she can abuse with it. All you're problem seems to be is that it's not 100% female, and 0% male. -_-".

Learn the equality factor, and you'd see, it's actually fair with procedures to accidental pregnancy, especially in minors.

Need more proof of how easy it is to be a female?

Well, this may be unjustified, but you have 3 reps, and about 10 posts.

I think I may be in the right to assume your gender, which is a rarity here, had something to do with it.

=o. On noes. 2sick went there.

That haves nothing to do with me being a girl, that i have those three reps, and really everything in favour of the girl, how about you have to walk around with a something inside you for 9 months and then push it out a tiny hole, and after that no guy would almost ever date you, you need to take care of your child 24/7 while the father maybe going out somewhere having fun, and well lets count, he loses only 200$ and lets say an extra 200$ for himself to pay taxes and food and whatever, and becuase the single mom works less she get paid 600$ for a crappy job somewhere cause she couldn't finish school, she needs to pay for taxes and food both her and the kid, for school, chothes, toys, higher electirc bills, higher phone bills, more gass, and maybe a baby sit, well you really think you can pay all that from the crappy 200$ the father needs to give? Besides the fact the mom still can't date or go out or do anything fun because she haves a child.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Oh' date=' Neko_Girl, you may think guys suck in a variety of ways. It's called flaws, and mainly notable by the ones who experience them. In the case of gender, it's the opposite sex.

Wow.

You also have no idea how pregnancies/child raising works.

If a male conceives a female, no matter what, the male is subjected to raising the child.

There is no maybes, since the government forces it.

How, you might ask?

Well, the government takes around 25% of the males salary and gives it to the mother. We're taking responsibility, no matter what. So, shut up, unless you know what actually happens. ='].

 

I do know that, but you really think that 25% of his money is going to make the girl happy that got pregnant?

Do you like know how hard it is to raise a child alone, well probably very hard and that isn't equal at all against those 25% you get from the guy. So the guy should take responsibilities and stay with the girl to care for his own children. Instead of running away afraid and be able to do whatever he wants only with 25% less salary. While the girl needs to take care and is been robbed from her freedom.

I think you fail to realize the impact that 25% less of the money you need to live off would have.

Okay, say, you have a moderate job, with a moderate salary.

getting about $800 per week. (Which is a little above average anyway.)

you lose $200. That could be your electrical budget, your food budget, your freaking rent for all I care. That amount of $200 is paid until the child's 18. Do the math. 52 x 200= $10400 p.a of payments. 10400 x 18 = $187200 of money contributed by the father over the child's youth. Add in government payments applicable to mothers, hell, you could live comfortably off accidental pregnancy.

Add in her own job as well, and everything for the child should be blissful and smooth. Robbed of her freedom? Besides rape, I'd think it's pretty obvious intercourse, as well as protection involved in intercourse, is a 50-50 thing. It's freaking in favor of the woman, if anything, considering stuff she can abuse with it. All you're problem seems to be is that it's not 100% female, and 0% male. -_-".

Learn the equality factor, and you'd see, it's actually fair with procedures to accidental pregnancy, especially in minors.

Need more proof of how easy it is to be a female?

Well, this may be unjustified, but you have 3 reps, and about 10 posts.

I think I may be in the right to assume your gender, which is a rarity here, had something to do with it.

=o. On noes. 2sick went there.

That haves nothing to do with me being a girl, that i have those three reps, and really everything in favour of the girl, how about you have to walk around with a something inside you for 9 months and then push it out a tiny hole, and after that no guy would almost ever date you, you need to take care of your child 24/7 while the father maybe going out somewhere having fun, and well lets count, he loses only 200$ and lets say an extra 200$ for himself to pay taxes and food and whatever, and becuase the single mom works less she get paid 600$ for a crappy job somewhere cause she couldn't finish school, she needs to pay for taxes and food both her and the kid, for school, chothes, toys, higher electirc bills, higher phone bills, more gass, and maybe a baby sit, well you really think you can pay all that from the crappy 200$ the father needs to give? Besides the fact the mom still can't date or go out or do anything fun because she has* a child.

 

First of all you use incredibly too many commas and not enough periods. But that's not on topic.

 

Okay basically here are my thoughts. Yeah sure, the dad's a prick. He knocked the woman up and left. But that doesn't mean that it's the dad's fault or that he should have to pay THAT much.

 

Assuming that the woman does make 600$ a week (which really isn't that bad) and that she is a single parent. She gets the added benifits of child support, she gets added benifits on her tax returns for having the child, and she can also apply for foodstamps and well-fair. Really how bad off is she?

 

This senario is like finding a mouse in your food at a resteraunt. Yeah sure you found a mouse in your food; but you can also sue the resteraunt for a lot of money.

 

And the whole thing about them having to raise the child 24/7 and never getting to have any fun; bullcrap. My mother was the single parent of 2 children who hated each other. She has a boyfriend now, and she only had to watch us 24/7 until we were 4.

 

And the way our government works today, you can sit on your ass and draw in well-fair without a job anyway.

 

Honestly who gets the worst end of the deal? The dad who loses money, or the mom who draws in a sheet load of money for squirting out a baby?

 

oh yeah and 2sick4u she got those reps because she's not a noob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Oh' date=' Neko_Girl, you may think guys suck in a variety of ways. It's called flaws, and mainly notable by the ones who experience them. In the case of gender, it's the opposite sex.

Wow.

You also have no idea how pregnancies/child raising works.

If a male conceives a female, no matter what, the male is subjected to raising the child.

There is no maybes, since the government forces it.

How, you might ask?

Well, the government takes around 25% of the males salary and gives it to the mother. We're taking responsibility, no matter what. So, shut up, unless you know what actually happens. ='].

 

I do know that, but you really think that 25% of his money is going to make the girl happy that got pregnant?

Do you like know how hard it is to raise a child alone, well probably very hard and that isn't equal at all against those 25% you get from the guy. So the guy should take responsibilities and stay with the girl to care for his own children. Instead of running away afraid and be able to do whatever he wants only with 25% less salary. While the girl needs to take care and is been robbed from her freedom.

I think you fail to realize the impact that 25% less of the money you need to live off would have.

Okay, say, you have a moderate job, with a moderate salary.

getting about $800 per week. (Which is a little above average anyway.)

you lose $200. That could be your electrical budget, your food budget, your freaking rent for all I care. That amount of $200 is paid until the child's 18. Do the math. 52 x 200= $10400 p.a of payments. 10400 x 18 = $187200 of money contributed by the father over the child's youth. Add in government payments applicable to mothers, hell, you could live comfortably off accidental pregnancy.

Add in her own job as well, and everything for the child should be blissful and smooth. Robbed of her freedom? Besides rape, I'd think it's pretty obvious intercourse, as well as protection involved in intercourse, is a 50-50 thing. It's freaking in favor of the woman, if anything, considering stuff she can abuse with it. All you're problem seems to be is that it's not 100% female, and 0% male. -_-".

Learn the equality factor, and you'd see, it's actually fair with procedures to accidental pregnancy, especially in minors.

Need more proof of how easy it is to be a female?

Well, this may be unjustified, but you have 3 reps, and about 10 posts.

I think I may be in the right to assume your gender, which is a rarity here, had something to do with it.

=o. On noes. 2sick went there.

That haves nothing to do with me being a girl, that i have those three reps, and really everything in favour of the girl, how about you have to walk around with a something inside you for 9 months and then push it out a tiny hole, and after that no guy would almost ever date you, you need to take care of your child 24/7 while the father maybe going out somewhere having fun, and well lets count, he loses only 200$ and lets say an extra 200$ for himself to pay taxes and food and whatever, and becuase the single mom works less she get paid 600$ for a crappy job somewhere cause she couldn't finish school, she needs to pay for taxes and food both her and the kid, for school, chothes, toys, higher electirc bills, higher phone bills, more gass, and maybe a baby sit, well you really think you can pay all that from the crappy 200$ the father needs to give? Besides the fact the mom still can't date or go out or do anything fun because she has* a child.

 

First of all you use incredibly too many commas and not enough periods. But that's not on topic.

 

Okay basically here are my thoughts. Yeah sure, the dad's a prick. He knocked the woman up and left. But that doesn't mean that it's the dad's fault or that he should have to pay THAT much.

 

Assuming that the woman does make 600$ a week (which really isn't that bad) and that she is a single parent. She gets the added benifits of child support, she gets added benifits on her tax returns for having the child, and she can also apply for foodstamps and well-fair. Really how bad off is she?

 

This senario is like finding a mouse in your food at a resteraunt. Yeah sure you found a mouse in your food; but you can also sue the resteraunt for a lot of money.

 

And the whole thing about them having to raise the child 24/7 and never getting to have any fun; bullcrap. My mother was the single parent of 2 children who hated each other. She has a boyfriend now, and she only had to watch us 24/7 until we were 4.

 

And the way our government works today, you can sit on your ass and draw in well-fair without a job anyway.

 

Honestly who gets the worst end of the deal? The dad who loses money, or the mom who draws in a s*** load of money for squirting out a baby?

 

oh yeah and 2sick4u she got those reps because she's not a noob.

Squirting out a baby you make it sound so very easily. But okay thats kinda right my mom is single parent also and she haves a boyfriend, and anway this went like way off topic. Besides both sides end up having worse then before and there both to blame then. Sorry for kinda getting so carried away. But you people made it sound like the girl gets all the great benfits and the guy gets all the bad stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Oh' date=' Neko_Girl, you may think guys suck in a variety of ways. It's called flaws, and mainly notable by the ones who experience them. In the case of gender, it's the opposite sex.

Wow.

You also have no idea how pregnancies/child raising works.

If a male conceives a female, no matter what, the male is subjected to raising the child.

There is no maybes, since the government forces it.

How, you might ask?

Well, the government takes around 25% of the males salary and gives it to the mother. We're taking responsibility, no matter what. So, shut up, unless you know what actually happens. ='].

 

I do know that, but you really think that 25% of his money is going to make the girl happy that got pregnant?

Do you like know how hard it is to raise a child alone, well probably very hard and that isn't equal at all against those 25% you get from the guy. So the guy should take responsibilities and stay with the girl to care for his own children. Instead of running away afraid and be able to do whatever he wants only with 25% less salary. While the girl needs to take care and is been robbed from her freedom.

I think you fail to realize the impact that 25% less of the money you need to live off would have.

Okay, say, you have a moderate job, with a moderate salary.

getting about $800 per week. (Which is a little above average anyway.)

you lose $200. That could be your electrical budget, your food budget, your freaking rent for all I care. That amount of $200 is paid until the child's 18. Do the math. 52 x 200= $10400 p.a of payments. 10400 x 18 = $187200 of money contributed by the father over the child's youth. Add in government payments applicable to mothers, hell, you could live comfortably off accidental pregnancy.

Add in her own job as well, and everything for the child should be blissful and smooth. Robbed of her freedom? Besides rape, I'd think it's pretty obvious intercourse, as well as protection involved in intercourse, is a 50-50 thing. It's freaking in favor of the woman, if anything, considering stuff she can abuse with it. All you're problem seems to be is that it's not 100% female, and 0% male. -_-".

Learn the equality factor, and you'd see, it's actually fair with procedures to accidental pregnancy, especially in minors.

Need more proof of how easy it is to be a female?

Well, this may be unjustified, but you have 3 reps, and about 10 posts.

I think I may be in the right to assume your gender, which is a rarity here, had something to do with it.

=o. On noes. 2sick went there.

That haves nothing to do with me being a girl, that i have those three reps, and really everything in favour of the girl, how about you have to walk around with a something inside you for 9 months and then push it out a tiny hole, and after that no guy would almost ever date you, you need to take care of your child 24/7 while the father maybe going out somewhere having fun, and well lets count, he loses only 200$ and lets say an extra 200$ for himself to pay taxes and food and whatever, and becuase the single mom works less she get paid 600$ for a crappy job somewhere cause she couldn't finish school, she needs to pay for taxes and food both her and the kid, for school, chothes, toys, higher electirc bills, higher phone bills, more gass, and maybe a baby sit, well you really think you can pay all that from the crappy 200$ the father needs to give? Besides the fact the mom still can't date or go out or do anything fun because she has* a child.

 

First of all you use incredibly too many commas and not enough periods. But that's not on topic.

 

Okay basically here are my thoughts. Yeah sure, the dad's a prick. He knocked the woman up and left. But that doesn't mean that it's the dad's fault or that he should have to pay THAT much.

 

Assuming that the woman does make 600$ a week (which really isn't that bad) and that she is a single parent. She gets the added benifits of child support, she gets added benifits on her tax returns for having the child, and she can also apply for foodstamps and well-fair. Really how bad off is she?

 

This senario is like finding a mouse in your food at a resteraunt. Yeah sure you found a mouse in your food; but you can also sue the resteraunt for a lot of money.

 

And the whole thing about them having to raise the child 24/7 and never getting to have any fun; bullcrap. My mother was the single parent of 2 children who hated each other. She has a boyfriend now, and she only had to watch us 24/7 until we were 4.

 

And the way our government works today, you can sit on your ass and draw in well-fair without a job anyway.

 

Honestly who gets the worst end of the deal? The dad who loses money, or the mom who draws in a s*** load of money for squirting out a baby?

 

oh yeah and 2sick4u she got those reps because she's not a noob.

My god. Thank you Willie.

The rep part, well, was a point I was trying to prove. Even though not being a noob isn't really something I'd rep for.

=/.

Also, just for the heck of it, Neko_girl, $200 isn't even close to the amount needed to survive a week.

You'd need about $500, at the least.

Ah man..

Sorry if I came of as rude/An ass, I just get.. Passionate? when I debate. =].

You did probably deserve the reps. ;].

Oh and Willie/Kevin, the name's Justin.

2sick~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The woman does get all the great benefits. The man gets no benefit; and overall he financially loses the entire deal.

 

Thats true but the woman also gets the worst stuff, its not like she only gets the benefits there is a reason she gets them you know. Well and sorry if i came over rude also i get also kinda passionate debating.

 

Edit: you see even now i try to press my point xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...