=aTaLiG= Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 (effect)This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by removing 2 monsters with an attack of 2000 or more from your Graveyard from play. As long as this card remains on the Field, your opponent's monsters cannot attack. When this card is destroyed and sent to the Graveyard, you can Special Summon 1 "Imp Warrior" from your hand by treating this card as 2 monsters with 2000 attack or more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 the last effect is quite confusing,can you explain it to us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
=aTaLiG= Posted July 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 when this "Imp Warrior" is destroyed you "may" Special Summon another one by treating this as 2 monsters with 2000 attack or more.....so when someone removes 2 monsters from play, they can instead make it easier if they got it in their hand and just remove this "Imp Warrior"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waza-b Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 Ahh confusing as Raviel said... looks like a 4star 2 me, nice pic though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kale Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 interesting card. i like it. ^_^ an attack stopper, and it helps out his comrades! 8.5/10. ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
=aTaLiG= Posted July 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 thanks Kale! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 hmmm, detsroyable only to spells/traps, interesting and niceso basically if you have another imp warrior you can summon it again? (a bit confusing) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 when this "Imp Warrior" is destroyed you "may" Special Summon another one by treating this as 2 monsters with 2000 attack or more.....so when someone removes 2 monsters from play' date=' they can instead make it easier if they got it in their hand and just remove this "Imp Warrior"...[/quote']ok,but it's still confusing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╬「Selatcia」╬ Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 It looks ok. OCG seems good, it's balanced. Good pic too. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
=aTaLiG= Posted July 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 thanks alot demented! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taimanao19 Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 great card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
God Kirby Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 nice card OCG is good and it has a nice effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas Maximus Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 Not bad. Your OCG is spot on. And the card seems well balanced. The image is a little overused though. Keep up the hard work. ;) 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ursus Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 I like this one :D Would be perfect in any burn deck that relies on heavier monsters. P. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodmouse Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 Great card, 8/10. But the last effect sure is confusing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantasy Dreamz Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 to me, the effect is ov'pw.. its almost impossible for opponent to be able to attack again..ever think what was one of the reason Restrict was banned..5/10the pix is nice tho.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.