Spellcasting Mage

[Uchiha]

[align=center]"Spellcasting Mage"

Card Lore:

This card's Attribute is also treated as DARK. This card cannot be targeted by the effects of Trap Cards. If this card is destroyed by a Spell Card, you can Special Summon this card from the Graveyard by removing 1 LIGHT monster and 1 DARK monster from play. You can Tribute this monster to add 1 Spell Card from your Deck to your hand. No Spell or Trap Cards can be activated until the End Phase if you use this effect. If you do not have a Spell Card in your hand, destroy this monster. If you have no cards in your hand, remove this card from play. If your opponent targets this card with a monster effect, negate the activation of the effect and remove the monster from play. This card cannot be Tributed except for a LIGHT or DARK monster. You must show your hand to your opponent during your Standby Phase. Your opponent must show thier hand to you during their Standby Phase.[/align]

[DGoser]

Very interesting and balanced, but your wording could be considered incorrect on its special summon ability (I would go with "Special Summon this card from your Graveyard by removing 1 Light monster and 1 Dark monster in your Graveyard from play"). Also, how does your opponent determine whether or not you have a spell card in hand? This card requires some sort of "reveal your hand" effect.

[Saturn of Elemia]

Lots of text. Cool image. Name of card is odd - A spellcasting spellcaster? :?. Good OCG. Stats are balanced for its effects. LOTS of effects. Well balanced overall.

 

9.8/10 8)

[Mr. Judgment Dragon]

Looks good. LIGHT and DARK are correct. The card looks fine to me. 9/10.

[Einhander]

name of this card is kinda lame i mean a mage does nothing more then casting a spell

but picture - effect - ocg is beyond godlike !! i really like

 

9/10 !!

[Spire]

Nice card, 9/10.

[TotalObelisk]

Interesting effect, name could use a bit of work but apart from that a really good card.

[Regnal]

The name sucks, and there is whole lotta text to read

otherwise, it's good

[╬「Selatcia」╬]

I'd recommend a name change in the card. Not bad otherwise.

9/10

[DGoser]

Looks good. LIGHT and DARK are correct. The card looks fine to me. 9/10.

You couldn't be paying too much attention then. The lore still doesn't designate where the LIGHT and DARK Monsters must be removed from (I'm assuming the Graveyard).

 

Also, the effect that destroys the card if you don't have a Spell in hand is still not legit, even with the showing of your hand at each Standby Phase. This is because whenever your hand is NOT being shown, it's like your hand "resets" (just like if you Book of Moon a Fusilier, it's ATK resets because it "forgets" it was Summoned without Tribute). The only way around this is to have an effect on this card stating that as long as you control it, you have to play with your hand revealed.

[SeiyamaruSisco]

i really like it, 9/10