Dark Angel Kimor Posted August 9, 2008 Report Share Posted August 9, 2008 here it isplz rate and comment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silas Angel Posted August 9, 2008 Report Share Posted August 9, 2008 very plain.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DG- Posted August 9, 2008 Report Share Posted August 9, 2008 balanced.no errors.cool pic.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted August 9, 2008 Report Share Posted August 9, 2008 Increadibly unoriginal, plain, and real cards have that effect, and use it too much. Just, not really a great idea...How about trying somthing that YOU made up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avariademon Posted August 9, 2008 Report Share Posted August 9, 2008 HORIBLY UNDERPOWERED you could pump that thing up to probably 2200 and make it a one sak and it would be decent good try but you can make it better 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted August 9, 2008 Report Share Posted August 9, 2008 ^ well, i'm wondering. How is it UNDERpowered? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avariademon Posted August 9, 2008 Report Share Posted August 9, 2008 2 k 2 sak? granted in older sets they did make cards that were weaker then what i stated but still, think about it would a 2200 atk one sak monster that can attack twice really effect the meta? seriously it would be interesting and perhaps fun but bairly any one would use it (depending on its stars and atribute) then again because its an 8 star it can be traded in. this card is underpowered, there is no doubt about that. course i could be wrong, though i highly doubt it, i mean i might not be thinking of the right cards like what about this is overpowered or not underpowered? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.D Star-Storm Posted August 9, 2008 Report Share Posted August 9, 2008 5/10 could be inproved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted August 9, 2008 Report Share Posted August 9, 2008 There is a reason why some of the most powerful double-attackers in this game either have near-impossible requirements, or are scheduled for a banning. Overpowered. 0/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted August 9, 2008 Report Share Posted August 9, 2008 Too plain, as in TOTALLY unoriginal, VERY bad picture, 4/10 Seriously dude, be more creative with your cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted August 9, 2008 Report Share Posted August 9, 2008 Oh, didn't see the Level. But rating stays unchanged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferrix Posted August 9, 2008 Report Share Posted August 9, 2008 No OCG errors, but that's probably 'cause the effect was taken from real cards :/ I actually like the pic, but that's the only good thing about this card. 2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willieh Posted August 9, 2008 Report Share Posted August 9, 2008 Kind of boring. It's got good ocg and stuff though. 5/10 because it's not very original. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantasy Dreamz Posted August 9, 2008 Report Share Posted August 9, 2008 bland and unoriginal/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spire Posted August 9, 2008 Report Share Posted August 9, 2008 Could use a better pic. The effect is also very basic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.