Loch Ness Monster [Debate]

[Skyfi]

Do You Beleive In It? I Do

[2sick4u]

Under a personal regard, no.

 

But from a logical perspective, you'd have to consider how it could of existed, and still exist.

 

Okay, firstly, let's label it a little more appropriately then "Lock ness monster." Which is a crappy mythological name in itself, I'm sure it could be better, but Scotland likes alcohol. Anyway, lets say it's some sort of still existent dinosaur/reptile. One that somehow survived, due to the ability to go submersible depths, I dunno. Just like the crocodile is a derivation of Deinosuchus, we can assume Lock Ness has one similar. (Although, I'm to lazy to find out.. >_>") Considering that, you can say that the "Lock Ness Monster" is in fact a prehistoric animal. Theory one, but, flaws are abundant. For starters, the prospect of a creature not evolving over the millions of years, that huge time-span, from then til' now, is pretty damn abstract. Evolution is slow, but certainly not that slow. Unless the Lock Ness monsters actually Evolved and we just don't know. Also, wow, one specific type of Dinosaur surviving the Prehistoric extinction is also Farfetched. I mean, The life span of the "Lock Ness" monster is debatable, but I'm sure it couldn't of survived all those millions of years individually, in some lake. Also, if it did have a family, and it is an offspring, it'd be more repopulated than it is now, at Population-1. The sheer lack of population pretty much disproves the existence of this thing alone.

 

Theory two; It's mutated.

This theory can also be attributed to Bigfoot as an mutated ape, or Lock Ness as some sort of massively mutated Elephant Seal. Not much explanation is needed here, but the fact that it could be mutated would suffice with the population steadyness.

 

Theory three; It'd dead.

Ever notice how the complete rage of Loch Ness ended rather abruptly? Well, this is to say, besides all the fake photographs, that there was an actual creature of some irregular nature in that lake. However, it's life-span ended, died, evidence, sightings and beliefs all abruptly dropped. =/. I dunno, I kinda pulled this one out of nowhere.

 

Theory Four, The crown Jewel, It's fake.

Consider it for a minute.

Now, the lake of Loch Ness is deep, freakin' deep. However, surface photographs and sightings have apparently been made. Therefore, according to the legends as well, which state it rests and roams at the deepest of depths, it would have to be able to swim through the various depths of the lake. You know, that mightent sound difficult, but different things could deem that impossible. One: The light contrast through water is incredibly narrow, therefore, minimal light can be seen whilst swimming. Humans eyes are fixed to only see at certain depths. Fish that are freaking massive levels under the surface all have some way of roaming in the black waters. Example: That weird fish with a light-bulb for a skull attachment/flashlight. Google it, and you'll see. With that in mind, "Nessy" would have to be able to swim blindly at low depths, or close it's eyes, due to excessive amounts of light, and swim blindly again at higher depths. Even then, if it's attributed to a lower depth nature, why the hell would it surface? Based on rare evidence, It can hold it's breath for a long time, to.

 

I feel like going on more, and talk about depth pressure, but I doubt anyone would bother reading it.

 

So, Summary= Loch Ness is unreal, on a bias level, although the disproving evidence heavily outweighs the proving evidence.

Although, believing in Teh Loch isn't bad, since it's just like Santa.

Only in a more massive carnivore way.

O.o.

[.:|Fallen|:.]

yes i do

[2sick4u]

yes i do

Elaborate, yeah?

 

I'd sometimes like to hope that I didn't type 4 paragraphs for one post count.

Rather, 4 paragraphs for one opinion that can shape others.

Anyway,

explain, what the hell do you find believable about it?

Either do so,

or don't debate. =/.

It's hardly debating if you just treat it like a poll.

(Even though this isn't far off of being one.. ~_~.)

[Willieh]

No. The loch ness monster does not exist. However it is very fun to believe that it does exist.

 

They've been searching for it for years. They haven't found any traces of it at all. All they know is what it could possibly look like. They think it's possible that it's some ancient dinosaur. Yeah, right. Even if it was an ancient dinosaur, which is impossible for it to live that long, wouldn't it have to come up for air more than just rarely?

[Trunks88]

yes I do belive it does

 

Think for a second if that is a hoax then we really need to keep in eye on Scotland (who could come up with that could rule the world). But I do agree with 2sick4u theroy that it has died and died a long time ago.

[Skyfi]

Well I Agree With Theory 1 Except There May Be More Then 1 We Do Not Know

[Silencerleader]

Well I Agree With Theory 1 Except There May Be More Then 1 We Do Not Know

 

Exactly my point Q4T

[Willieh]

If there ever was a Loch Ness monster, it was prehistoric and it's existence too place before humans came about. Just like the rest of the dinosaurs.

[Guest KAJN]

There is definitely more than one. As you know, the Loch Ness monster was also found in Japan and Africa. The weird thing is that they appear once or twice, then no trace. They maybe travel around the world but don't actually appear. Or they may be dead already................ Either way there is something. It's 1 of the worlds mystery we have to figure out or we can just stay silent about it.

[Willieh]

There is definitely more than one. As you know' date=' the Loch Ness monster was also found in Japan and Africa. [b']The weird thing is that they appear once or twice, then no trace.[/b] They maybe travel around the world but don't actually appear. Or they may be dead already................ Either way there is something. It's 1 of the worlds mystery we have to figure out or we can just stay silent about it.

 

That's because it's fake.

 

There have been bigfoot sightings thousands of times. And those are just the one's that we've recorded. The Loch Ness monster is rarely ever reported to be seen.

 

I don't believe there is a Loch Ness monster. There could have been a plesiosaurus in Loch Ness at one time , but not anymore.

 

And by "at one time" I mean years and years and years and years before humans were existent on our world.

[Shrekstasy]

2sick4u said it all...

---

It could have/be (been) real, but it most likely died. I believe the best theory of it is visualized in the movie : "The Water Horse".

[Static]

I chill with Loch Ness every New years. He knows how to throw a party.

 

He's real laddy.

[Guest JoshIcy]

Umm... Ok...

No I don't due to that for, it would have been spotted by now due to its possible size.

If it is real, and it comes up every once in a while it would have to be because it needs air and I doubt that a few seconds is enough for years at a time....

 

o.O.. Yeah I dont believe in it at all...

[Huntar!]

Yes I do. There have been hundreds of pictures and pieces of evidence from Loch Ness. There is just too much proof to say its instantly a hoax.

[Tabris]

Yes I do. There have been hundreds of pictures and pieces of evidence from Loch Ness. There is just too much proof to say its instantly a hoax.

 

And the problem with those is that they're either outright hoaxes, or too blurry, or haven't any negatives to prove the pictures aren't hoaxes...

 

... so there.

[Huntar!]

Does someone need actually stable and concrete evidence anymore to believe in what they want anymore?

 

I believe, I think the evidence is real and good..

 

There.. pwnt

[Static]

Does someone need actually stable and concrete evidence anymore to believe in what they want anymore?

 

I believe' date=' I think the evidence is real and good..

 

There.. pwnt

[/quote']

 

Wrong. Believing without concrete evidence makes you a retarded American.

[Davok]

Does someone need actually stable and concrete evidence anymore to believe in what they want anymore?

 

I believe' date=' I think the evidence is real and good..

 

There.. pwnt

[/quote']

 

Wrong. Believing without concrete evidence makes you a retarded American.

 

As a Canadian, I can safely Q4T. (no offense, though)

 

Hmmm... it is quite possible that it exists, but there is not any concrete proof that it exists, just a number of blurry pictures and out of focus cameras. Not to mention that the scientific community isn't putting in much effort to try to discover a monster that most probably might not exist.

 

I personally believe in it, but logically it needs more proof.

[Phantasy Dreamz]

just my pov...

if that monster exist in that lake, then humans should be able to catch it...... i mean, c'mon..... its only a lake... its not even big contrasting it to the ocean..

and if it breath, eat, reproduce...... it should have remants.. which turns to evidence..

[Catman25]

Yeah, The loch ness monster could've been a dinosaur, but became extinct, for all we know, their could've been many of this monster.

[Davok]

just my pov...

if that monster exist in that lake' date=' then humans should be able to catch it...... i mean, c'mon..... its only a lake... its not even big contrasting it to the ocean..

and if it breath, eat, reproduce...... it should have remants.. which turns to evidence..

[/quote']

 

The one problem is, that scientists aren't going to look for it. And also you highly underestimate how deep Loch Ness really is. Also, it's hard to catch a giant dinosaur like creature with just a net or something. Also, since the only people who are actually interested in the Loch Ness Monster are Scots and people who just pin hoaxes to make fake evidence, I very much doubt we'll find any remains.

[Cin]

Having actually see Loch Ness and the attraction there I still feel sceptical, I'm one of those who requires it to be proven by science to believe and sure they would have found something that size by now.

 

There's more people interested in the Loch Ness Monster than just the Scots...we English are interested too.

[Willieh]

THERE'S ONLY ONE SOLUTION.

 

WE MUST DRAIN LOCH NESS.

 

Or eat cake.

[barsam]

THERE'S ONLY ONE SOLUTION.

 

WE MUST BE RETARDS

 

Or eat cake.

 

Fixed