Guest Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Eh, I banned it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bakura Vessal Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 I cant belive it mods can do what they want and members cant WTF!!!!? look its just stupid and if DMG doesnt get the warning away or if dj gets a warning i am just going to assume that almost all the mods are corrupt (excuding darth and crab) I already revoked DMG's warning. ' pid='990954' dateline='1219131795']Okay really? Penalizing someone for something as simple as making a thread to clarify card rulings or something? Absolutely ridiculous. And now' date=' apparently warns are issued out if someone posts their deck without including the number of monsters, spells, and traps. More ridiculous.[/quote'] Really? This happened? Link me to that. I need to revoke that too. I mean, I put that rule in the rules topic, but not with the intention of people being penalized for it. I just put it there so that people could be told to add the numbers to the deck topic. Again, similar to the Mafia Smite scenario. kewl (notece i called you one of the only non corrupt mods)Well back as J-Max now. Thanks again Crab. Please fight for these Warning Rules' date=' I think some of the Mods these days have serious Trigger Fingers. What happens about that Account now? I'm sorry to have had to create it....[/quote'] why did you have to use dat account anyway couldnt you have used your own one (it wasnt banned i dont think) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 I think 60% warn results in a temporary revokement of posting ability, or something like that. And no, revokement is not a word. That doesn't stop me from using it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bakura Vessal Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 I think 60% warn results in a temporary revokement of posting ability' date=' or something like that. And no, revokement is not a word. That doesn't stop me from using it.[/quote'] 60% warn, for just doing that i know its not like that anymore but still wtf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Max Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 It was actually 10% I bought this up because it was a Permanent Warning which in my eyes should NEVER happen. The other 50% was from DJ for my "Vicious Swearing" it's supposed to end tonight but I bet it will come right back.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 everything happens when I am away.....anywaysglas you're back,and I completly object to the warning systemit's unfair.....this is the internet for petes sake, what's with the problem with mild swearing?words from a forum cannot hurt people.....at least it can't hurt meit's unfair, it makes mods like godand you're not godso take it offbefore YCM just corrupts....p.s if this continues on YCM will have a maximum lifespan of 2 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaitou Kid Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 *Sigh*I Miss everything.But why a perma it makes no sense.A temp would because you broke a rule.(Actully you didnt even break one)But a perma no way.Mods think they are all mighty because they can do whatever the f*** they want.Only YCMaker can do what he wants.i remember seeing a post from a mod(Diff fourm)"I double post because I can. You can't because I said so."Now replace "double post" with whatever you want.Swear,break rules.There are only a few bad mods that I wont name.They think like that"Were mods so we do what we want. Your members so you cant."Mods you were promoted because people thought you could hadle power. But when a mod does something like that it shows the cant. (Off Topic:How come Slimey is in the Fomer Moderators List) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 There is a thread to ask TCG question, ask them there and you do not risk being warned. Only my advice Also when numbers arent on deck section, i always ask people to add them and if i am ignored then the warning is the next course of action Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larxene Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 *facepalm*This is eactly why I never go into the TCG section(Off Topic:How come Slimey is in the Fomer Moderators List) He left the site Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Oh, yeah, I forgot that the QA topic was mandatory as the only place to ask questions. ...that rule sucks too. Anyhow, permanent warns for just about anything that wouldn't get you permabanned anyhow is a ridiculous idea, and doling them out for the most trivial of "offenses" is just silly. Also, I love how Pikachu seems incapable of distinguishing a warn feature on an internet forum with absolute divine power over the universe. Methinks he takes the internet too seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Did i say i agreed with the perm warn? Did i say that QA was only place to ask? The answer to both of these are no However i would reccomend using the sticky to avoid warnings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyfi Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 J-Max As A Friend Im Telling You Are Taking This Way To Serious. Afterall This Is Just Online. But I Know You Want To Know What Happened. Id Be Pissed To, But Hey This Forum Is To Strict As Kox Said. So Plz Be Strong. And Dont Take It To Seriously - Your Friend, Stardust Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Did i say i agreed with the perm warn? Did i say that QA was only place to ask? The answer to both of these are no However i would reccomend using the sticky to avoid warnings. If you will receive warnings for asking questions outside of the sticky, then it is the only place to ask. That's, like, a definition or something. And since the question being asked didn't violate the "Stupid Question" rule (based on the Wiki/UDE definition of "stupid" contained in the rule), the logical conclusion is that the warning was given simply because it wasn't in the QA topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Did i say i agreed with the perm warn? Did i say that QA was only place to ask? The answer to both of these are no However i would reccomend using the sticky to avoid warnings. If you will receive warnings for asking questions outside of the sticky' date=' then it is the only place to ask. That's, like, a definition or something. And since the question being asked didn't violate the "Stupid Question" rule (based on the Wiki/UDE definition of "stupid" contained in the rule), the logical conclusion is that the warning was given simply because it wasn't in the QA topic.[/quote'] Then why not play it safe and ask them in the QA. I do not give out the warnings in the TCG so i cannot comend Tea for warning people for asking questions. However i would say dont take the risk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Did i say i agreed with the perm warn? Did i say that QA was only place to ask? The answer to both of these are no However i would reccomend using the sticky to avoid warnings. If you will receive warnings for asking questions outside of the sticky' date=' then it is the only place to ask. That's, like, a definition or something. And since the question being asked didn't violate the "Stupid Question" rule (based on the Wiki/UDE definition of "stupid" contained in the rule), the logical conclusion is that the warning was given simply because it wasn't in the QA topic.[/quote'] Then why not play it safe and ask them in the QA. I do not give out the warnings in the TCG so i cannot comend Tea for warning people for asking questions. However i would say dont take the risk. In other words, it is a de facto rule that the QA topic is the only place in which questions can be asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Did i say i agreed with the perm warn? Did i say that QA was only place to ask? The answer to both of these are no However i would reccomend using the sticky to avoid warnings. If you will receive warnings for asking questions outside of the sticky' date=' then it is the only place to ask. That's, like, a definition or something. And since the question being asked didn't violate the "Stupid Question" rule (based on the Wiki/UDE definition of "stupid" contained in the rule), the logical conclusion is that the warning was given simply because it wasn't in the QA topic.[/quote'] Then why not play it safe and ask them in the QA. I do not give out the warnings in the TCG so i cannot comend Tea for warning people for asking questions. However i would say dont take the risk. In other words, it is a de facto rule that the QA topic is the only place in which questions can be asked.Hey i dont control the TCG section so i cant make any rules, Its up to you and Tea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Good Show Crab for winning. Good show Jesus and friends (which means the rest of you that aren't Umbra) for getting it. Have we all agreed that this whole thing is a complete blasphemy and had the issue settled? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Argumenting with YCM is like playing table tennis against a brick wall. Boring to do - unless you have done it WAY too much - but helluva fun to watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RestLess-BoTics Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 J-Max As A Friend Im Telling You Are Taking This Way To Serious. Afterall This Is Just Online. But I Know You Want To Know What Happened. Id Be Pissed To' date=' But Hey This Forum Is To Strict As Kox Said. So Plz Be Strong. And Dont Take It To Seriously - Your Friend, Stardust[/quote'] Lol, it's funny...You kind of copied exactly what I said on page one... :/ -Glasstin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Why does my name get repeatedly mentioned, i have only ever given 2 warnings since they were introduced, and im sorry but i didnt create warning percentages, if you didnt break rules Mods wouldnt have to increase the percentage, also, you wont get any from me, im on strike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larxene Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Why does my name get repeatedly mentioned' date=' i have only ever given 2 warnings since they were introduced, and im sorry but i didnt create warning percentages, if you didnt break rules Mods wouldnt have to increase the percentage, also, you wont get any from me, im on strike.[/quote'] Are you going on strike just to get rid of those star ratings? I can't believe you would go through with that XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 yea Dj is having a BF over star ratings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 yea Dj is having a BF over star ratings BF... boyfriend? No, I honestly have no idea. Someone needs to AutoCorrect abbreviations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 BF= B**** fit havent u ever watched White Chicks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 BF= B**** fit havent u ever watched White Chicks? A long, long time agoI can still remember how that music used to make me smileand I knew if I had the chancethat I could make those people danceand maybe they'd be happy for a while Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.