Jump to content

We never landed on the moon

Hioco

By Hioco
in General

Recommended Posts

JesusofChaos™ Newbie

JesusofChaos™

Posted
Posted

Good because feeling matter on the internet dont they?

Anyway scrap my stars theroy heres the real reason:

 

Ever tried to go into a brightly lit area and look up and see stars?

You cant

This is even more so with cameras

You must be in a dark area to see the stars

 

The moon has no atmosphere thus cannot block out any of the suns light meaning it is very bright on the moons surface. Thus you cannot see stars when taking a picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
MarbleZone Newbie

MarbleZone

Posted
Posted

Topics like this give me second thoughts about leaving. Apparently, communist now roughly translates into murderer or pedophile. Your reaction to having been called that is insulting to actual communists, as a matter of fact.

 

Seriously, get over it and keep struggling with the mysteries of gravity and light refraction, it's amusing to read your theories, folks. By the way, I blame Obama for the landing being a lie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Axiom_Nor Newbie

Axiom_Nor

Posted
Posted

Ok,

your star theory is a load of bullshit and chips.

 

The reason why we see stars like we do is because of light reflecting off tiny little particles in out atmosphere.

Moon = No atmosphere = Few-none / different looking stars.

THE FLAG MOVED 'CAUSE THE GUY HIT IT!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jerry OldMaster Newbie

Jerry OldMaster

Posted
Posted

its just a fake background they made

so all the stuff about people going into space is a LIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Even if the US thingie was fake' date=' Yuri still was in the space before anyone else and there is proof of that, so think moar about your comments, please >.>

 

You just called me a communist even though I'm not. I find that insulting.

 

Nothing insluting about communism :\

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Willieh Newbie

Willieh

Posted
Posted

:/

 

We did land on the moon. Just as there is evidence as to us not landing on the moon, there is evidence to us LANDING on the moon.

 

Making an unnoficial statement like this will just cause pointless arguments because none of us know for sure.

 

This would have been better suited in debates because this is obviously meant to spark up an argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davok Newbie

Davok

Posted
Posted

....

 

It appears that the starters of this thread and the individuals who agreed in the thread starter's theories without any real logical back up for their claims are um... misinformed who wish to invest their minds in the fact of trust that the thread starter is right.

 

JoC, 2Sick, OldMaster, and all the other logic users, are right. Pointless thread is now pointless.

 

Also, to your Area 51 statement, the Government isn't lying about anything concerning Area 51, unless your own of the occultist alien fanatics who actually believe in the Roswell Hoax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zexaeon Newbie

Zexaeon

Posted
Posted

Horrible debating idea is horrible.

 

I'll discuss each theory though.

 

1) Okay. You can see wires. Congratulations' date=' I never knew high tech space machinery could be run without wires. Genius is genius.

 

2) No stars. This is rather convincing, besides the fact of the moon's light and dark reflection surface adding in time, angle, and other factors, can prove the disappearance of stars to be logical. It's through our camera's and recording photography to. Freaking hell. Whilst, if it was fake, and it was filmed in a studio, uhh, why would NASA just be like "Screw it, we'll make the background look fake. No-ones gonna notice. God we're genius." Logically, NASA wouldn't forget, so I support the ideal that the stars became unapparent due to some sort of illusionary contrast. =/.

 

3) The rippling of the flag. Bah. This is a bullcrap theory, to bury NASA even more. Neil Armstrong was placing the flag in the ground whilst it was rippling, meaning he was forcing it into the freaking ROCK surface of the moon. He was trying to get the pole into the rock, is all. If you cared to watch a lil' longer, you'd notice the flag settles down immediately after Neil releases it.

 

^Photo above me looks fake.

=D.

Besides, in the photo above me, you can see stars.

Contradiction much?

 

I dunno.

I couldn't care if it happened or not.

But does it make a big deal if it didn't?

No, it doesn't, conspiracists need a better life.

='].

 

 

 

One thing to say to you!!!!

 

 

 

 

 

I'M BORED!!! STOP MAKING ME THINK!!!!!

 

and shwa

 

Considering that you're participating in this discussion, it's pretty close-minded to suddenly respond with "stop making me think". The Moon Landing was not fake. I'd explain why, but 2sick already did that for me.

 

Thank you, 2sick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest KAJN

Guest KAJN

Posted
Posted

That is right' date=' it doesn't affecxt you that certain way butwhat if the US is lieing about area 51 just being airforce test ficillity. and look what I just did...

 

 

[img']http://i36.tinypic.com/11boop1.jpg[/img]

 

Bad GFX is bad. It's really a pain that someone takes a pictures and just sticks a flag. No I'm not talking about you I'm talking about where you got the image from. Because I can a sure you that this image is fake. The flag is pretty much like flouting not stuck so I wouldn't say that the flag is real. There are wires on the floor but it doesn't really mean it's a fake because photographers are not naive to not remove the wires. And to be honest I think we did land on the moon. How do you explain the new technology huh? How do you explain people working on rockets, paying millions to just "Blast off the earth" paying millions to get food for those tube things? You can just go to youtube and just look for these things. That's wrong. You know why? Because there may be people that want NASA to fail. Exactly, you can't point at something unless you have true evidence. I'll write other stuff later right now, I won't have the right time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyber Altair Newbie

Cyber Altair

Posted
Posted

One thing to say to you!!!!

I'M BORED!!! STOP MAKING ME THINK!!!!!

and shwa

 

Looks like it's a big fat fake lie.

 

failed2.jpg

 

Good because feeling matter on the internet dont they?

Anyway scrap my stars theroy heres the real reason:

 

Ever tried to go into a brightly lit area and look up and see stars?

You cant

This is even more so with cameras

You must be in a dark area to see the stars

 

The moon has no atmosphere thus cannot block out any of the suns light meaning it is very bright on the moons surface. Thus you cannot see stars when taking a picture.

 

largequantitiesofwin.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Judgment Dragon Apprentice

Mr. Judgment Dragon

Posted
Posted

One thing to say to you!!!!

I'M BORED!!! STOP MAKING ME THINK!!!!!

and shwa

 

Looks like it's a big fat fake lie.

 

failed2.jpg

 

Good because feeling matter on the internet dont they?

Anyway scrap my stars theroy heres the real reason:

 

Ever tried to go into a brightly lit area and look up and see stars?

You cant

This is even more so with cameras

You must be in a dark area to see the stars

 

The moon has no atmosphere thus cannot block out any of the suns light meaning it is very bright on the moons surface. Thus you cannot see stars when taking a picture.

 

largequantitiesofwin.jpg

 

These pictures are epic win.

Anyway, how can a flag wave about on the moon if there is no air? Simple. It cant. Where are the stars? I dont see any. Space should have stars. A video is not proof that we landed on the moon. Anyone couldve made it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...