Administrators Falling Pizza Posted March 2, 2007 Administrators Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuelingHorus Posted March 2, 2007 Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 Both are broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Falling Pizza Posted March 2, 2007 Author Administrators Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 What the goodness are you talking about?! How are these "broken"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yugiohmasta 444 Posted March 2, 2007 Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 i really like the cards. just one question, what does the -300 mean? its really no different than having an defense of 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Falling Pizza Posted March 2, 2007 Author Administrators Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 Well it would make a difference in the following situations:1. A card with 0 attack attacks Attack Troll while it's in defense position.2. A card equipped with fairy meteor crush or that has that effect attacks it. Â Either way having a negative defense would be extremely annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death12328 Posted March 3, 2007 Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 Intersting cards and on your Troll thats simple to understand since if it was considered to be in defense mode a simple 0 atk power monster like o say Ojama Yellow could kill it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted March 3, 2007 Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 Either way Attack troll is broken. To be able to summon a monster that can kill most level 7s without a tribute or a downside of any kind (The negative defense doesn't affect much if it never goes to defense mode "Final Attack Orders" would be good) is way too good. Â I love Sunshine Parrots though, it would definitely be limited, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yugiohmasta 444 Posted March 3, 2007 Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 Well it would make a difference in the following situations:1. A card with 0 attack attacks Attack Troll while it's in defense position.2. A card equipped with fairy meteor crush or that has that effect attacks it. yeah thats what i was thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Falling Pizza Posted March 3, 2007 Author Administrators Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 Shaco: I disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted March 3, 2007 Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 What are your reasonings for disagreeing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Falling Pizza Posted March 3, 2007 Author Administrators Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 In most modern yugioh duels, CONTROL is one of the most significant factors. Most duelists will have cards that give them power, such as changing the position of an opposing monster, even if it's at a cost. In a duel like this, having a -300 defense would be terribly bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted March 3, 2007 Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 But on the other hand, if your opponent happened to have a card like Final Attack Orders, or Non-Spellcasting Area on the field you'd have a super powerful monster on the field that didn't' cost anything to bring out. And with the Strike of Neos set that just came out, with a lot of support for Normal monsters, it makes this card even more broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Falling Pizza Posted March 3, 2007 Author Administrators Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 Stop using the term "broken". It doesn't make any sense at all. Â Well I'm going to make another version with more downsides for the owner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Falling Pizza Posted March 3, 2007 Author Administrators Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuelingHorus Posted March 3, 2007 Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 When i meant broken, 4 star 2600 normal is too powerful but i see you fixed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshcooper Posted March 3, 2007 Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 I liked your original, 2600 might be a bit powerful, but lowering it to 2500 or 2400 would have been ok rather than adding a an effect. Maybe you could have botha nd call the second one Attack Troll #2? Good job Falling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thekingofgames Posted March 3, 2007 Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 Broken means you made the card too powerful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frunk Posted March 4, 2007 Report Share Posted March 4, 2007 Well, perhaps you could make Attack Troll a 5 star monster, the Sunshine Parrots would be very useful too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 I agree. its too powerful. the second version is much better. i dont even like monsters with 1900 because they are just too powerful if you dont have a monster stronger than it. I dont like Gene-warped Werewolf. it means every card with 1800 is completely obsolete now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.