Archbaron Larry Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 Hi! Just to let you guys know, this is my first discussion thread. http://www.janime.info/card/Leon/eng/mirror_force.jpgDiscuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 awesome card is awesome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 Non chainable and too situational... it must be bad! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judαs Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 Non chainable and too situational... it must be bad! OMG! Mirror force is so OP that it's limited.Destroy all opponent's attack position monsters isn't bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archbaron Larry Posted August 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 Non chainable and too situational... it must be bad! OMG! Mirror force is so OP that it's limited.Destroy all opponent's attack position monsters isn't bad. What do you mean "not bad'? This card is awesome in my opinion! It's my all time fav card!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judαs Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 I also like it... but I only have a fake... T_T Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 The user who posted that it was bad was joking. Mirror Force is okay. Lightsworn decks rarely run it. I don't think its so overpowered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 Mirror force is so OP that it's limited. And Metamorphosis is so OP that it's banned. Konami's list should never be used as an argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 its the only thing we can use as an argument -.- ffs ---^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 If the only argument you are capable of making is "Konami said X is true, therefore X is true", then you are bad at this game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archbaron Larry Posted August 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 True, I admit I am bad at this game, I always get ripped off in my boosters (it makes me sad.) And please don't critizize or respond in a negitave way to my opinon or I will give you a neg rep cuz I'm tired of this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 I haven't addressed you at any point in this topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoPaladin2008 Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 ------------------------------^its what crab does. get used to it >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 Good card is good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archbaron Larry Posted August 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 Sorry, I lost power, then it turned back on, wierd.Anyway Crab, I don't mean that, I mean more like insulting. You have done it in all of my discussion threads and in your discussion thread; that little "get off my internet" threat. Do me a favor: Behave Yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 Oh no he didn't no one disrespects Crab NO ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 I say this card belongs at three, even more so if Harpies ever became dominant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archbaron Larry Posted August 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 Skuldur-Please stay out of this. This argument is between me and Crab. And also Skuldur, I'm not disrespecting Crab. I'm defending myself. He's the one disrespecting me. Look at the rest of my discussion threads and his Magician of Faith thread. Look in those threads! Look at how many times HE disrespected ME. And Crab, I am getting ready to give you a neg, or even report you! Just don't make me, because honestly, I don't want to. Edit: I've made up my mind. That "get off my internet" threat is unacceptable Crab. ~reported~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 I say this card belongs at three' date=' even more so if Harpies ever became dominant.[/quote'] 3 copies of this murders aggro decks. Furthermore, it incites a significant rise in s/t removal, which in turn murders non-chainables. Honestly, under normal circumstances, this card would be banworthy. However, we need it around as a deterrent, and to add the concept of overextending to the game. Skuldur-Please stay out of this. This argument is between me and Crab. And also Skuldur' date=' I'm not disrespecting Crab. I'm defending myself. He's the one disrespecting me. Look at the rest of my discussion threads and his Magician of Faith thread. Look in those threads! Look at how many times HE disrespected ME. And Crab, I am getting ready to give you a neg, or even report you! Just don't make me, because honestly, I don't want to. Edit: I've made up my mind. That "get off my internet" threat is unacceptable Crab. ~reported~[/quote'] My policy is that, when someone is bad at this game, I inform them that thy are bad at this game. It's not a complex policy, nor is it an unfair policy. Nobody cares about rep. Oh no, I have been reported to the local board moderator! The horror! Oh, wait. I am the local board moderator. Also, I suggest you check your dictionary for the definition of "threat". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 I say this card belongs at three' date=' even more so if Harpies ever became dominant.[/quote'] 3 copies of this murders aggro decks. Furthermore, it incites a significant rise in s/t removal, which in turn murders non-chainables. Honestly, under normal circumstances, this card would be banworthy. However, we need it around as a deterrent, and to add the concept of overextending to the game. Right now we've got decks that can flood the field in an instant. Rescue Cat Synchro? It's ridiculous; in two seconds you're staring down a full row of massive beat sticks. I seriously don't think it'd be that detrimental, not now, at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archbaron Larry Posted August 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 Agreed with Crab. Mirror Force down to 3 would be crazy. They should leave it at 1, or 2, but I doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 I say this card belongs at three' date=' even more so if Harpies ever became dominant.[/quote'] 3 copies of this murders aggro decks. Furthermore, it incites a significant rise in s/t removal, which in turn murders non-chainables. Honestly, under normal circumstances, this card would be banworthy. However, we need it around as a deterrent, and to add the concept of overextending to the game. Right now we've got decks that can flood the field in an instant. Rescue Cat Synchro? It's ridiculous; in two seconds you're staring down a full row of massive beat sticks. I seriously don't think it'd be that detrimental, not now, at least. Remember that I also advocate 3 Torrential. Agreed with Crab. Mirror Force down to 3 would be crazy. They should leave it at 1' date=' or 2, but I doubt it.[/quote'] No. Not 2. Theoretically, Konami could create a card that belongs at 2. But unless you feel that Volcanic Scattershot or Thunder Dragon is overpowered, they haven't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 I say this card belongs at three' date=' even more so if Harpies ever became dominant.[/quote'] 3 copies of this murders aggro decks. Furthermore, it incites a significant rise in s/t removal, which in turn murders non-chainables. Honestly, under normal circumstances, this card would be banworthy. However, we need it around as a deterrent, and to add the concept of overextending to the game. Right now we've got decks that can flood the field in an instant. Rescue Cat Synchro? It's ridiculous; in two seconds you're staring down a full row of massive beat sticks. I seriously don't think it'd be that detrimental, not now, at least. Remember that I also advocate 3 Torrential. So we're on equal terms? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 I say this card belongs at three' date=' even more so if Harpies ever became dominant.[/quote'] 3 copies of this murders aggro decks. Furthermore, it incites a significant rise in s/t removal, which in turn murders non-chainables. Honestly, under normal circumstances, this card would be banworthy. However, we need it around as a deterrent, and to add the concept of overextending to the game. Right now we've got decks that can flood the field in an instant. Rescue Cat Synchro? It's ridiculous; in two seconds you're staring down a full row of massive beat sticks. I seriously don't think it'd be that detrimental, not now, at least. Remember that I also advocate 3 Torrential. So we're on equal terms? Sort of. 1 Mirror + 3 Torrential can handle swarm threats. 3 Mirror + 3 Torrential makes instant swarm absolutely the only aggro strategy. It also means that every single aggro deck still in existence decks hordes of s/t removal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archbaron Larry Posted August 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 Yeah, that's what I thought, 2 for Mirror Force would still be crazy, and if it was banned, duels would have less action.My conclusion: Leave it at 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.