NineteenHundred Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 My first discussion thread. I hope I followed the rules correctly. I checked and I don`t think this has been discussed before. General Questions:Do you think 2200 DEF is too high for a 3-star even with the mantineance costs? Do you think the fact that it prevents the moderately powerful monsters, besides Psychics, from attacking, can be a good strategy? Discuss. Overall View: BadReason: Compulsory mantineance costs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 There are 4 stars with higher defense. (Defender and Big Shield Gardna being the first two that jump to mind, and Gear Golem the Moving Fortress matches it's 2200.) 2200 for a three star isn't "too high". Monsters can get on the field mighty quickly, so I don't think it's 2000 or less attack thing would ever be a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 It's just a bad staller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 Annoying because maitence cost isnt optional Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 combo with gora turtle for no attacking except 1899- psychics. not good for much else than burn stall def. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 a bad staller, can be destroyed way to easily, maybe it can be annoying for glads Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesus Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 Where have I been? When did we get Pyschic Monsters? =/. Oh well. None the less, it's just a weird stall card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 It's a bad stall card. Simple as that. The pic is kind of cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixty Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 Where have I been? When did we get Pyschic Monsters? =/. Oh well. None the less' date=' it's just a weird stall card.[/quote'] You've certainly been sleeping when TDGS came out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bozotehpwns Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 We got psychics when we got syncros...i certainly hope you didn't miss that lol, a crappy stall if you ask me just run Gravity bind or something, im hoping theres a combo i don't know about with him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest setojim Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 There are 4 stars with higher defense. (Defender and Big Shield Gardna being the first two that jump to mind' date=' and Gear Golem the Moving Fortress matches it's 2200.) 2200 for a three star isn't "too high". Monsters can get on the field mighty quickly, so I don't think it's 2000 or less attack thing would ever be a problem.[/quote'] BTW, Gear Golem the Moving Fortress is a level 4 monster Second, this card sux cuz of maintinence costs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tickle Me Emo Posted September 16, 2008 Report Share Posted September 16, 2008 bad card is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NineteenHundred Posted September 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2008 Yeah it is pretty bad by itself, though it can turn into a good card by using Barrel Behind the Door. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted September 16, 2008 Report Share Posted September 16, 2008 Is Level 3 that much better than Level 4 when it comes to stalling? LLAB and Gravity Bind are two of the biggest cards that care about the distinction (Synchro Summoning notwithstanding), and I'm not planning on attacking with a wall anyhow. >_> Also, bad, for the reasons stated by the above posters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Digital.Simplicity. Posted September 16, 2008 Report Share Posted September 16, 2008 I have tons of this card i don't think it's that good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted September 17, 2008 Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 Make it a point to ignore this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted September 18, 2008 Report Share Posted September 18, 2008 This card is only good with Mind Master, for grave Dumping. /disc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted September 18, 2008 Report Share Posted September 18, 2008 I'm noticing synergy with Burden of the Mighty, but I would much rather run a Tiger Burden deck over a Psychic Burden deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.