Fh-Fh Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 My friends think this card should be unbanned. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 No. Discussed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 Activate this card on your opponent's turn and they have no way of easily clearing the field or drawing cards other than maybe with certain monster effects. Then you're free to let it be killed on your Standby Phase and activate your own Spells. Could then be recycled with Mask of Darkness to do it all over again. It's basically a trap that says "Negate all Spell Cards on your opponent's turn. By paying 700 Life Points during your Standby Phase, and not activating any Spell Cards this turn, you may activate this effect again." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 Activate this card on your opponent's turn and they have no way of easily clearing the field or drawing cards other than maybe with certain monster effects. Then you're free to let it be killed on your Standby Phase and activate your own Spells. Could then be recycled with Mask of Darkness to do it all over again. It's basically a trap that says "Negate all Spell Cards on your opponent's turn. By paying 700 Life Points during your Standby Phase' date=' and not activating any Spell Cards this turn, you may activate this effect again."[/quote'] You're forgetting to emphasize the fact that it's also a cost-free Magic Jammer when it first gets used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fh-Fh Posted September 23, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 My friends also think TCGPlayer is a good site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 Activate this card on your opponent's turn and they have no way of easily clearing the field or drawing cards other than maybe with certain monster effects. Then you're free to let it be killed on your Standby Phase and activate your own Spells. Could then be recycled with Mask of Darkness to do it all over again. It's basically a trap that says "Negate all Spell Cards on your opponent's turn. By paying 700 Life Points during your Standby Phase' date=' and not activating any Spell Cards this turn, you may activate this effect again."[/quote'] You're forgetting to emphasize the fact that it's also a cost-free Magic Jammer when it first gets used.Ah, yes, True. And then it stops them from using the rest of the Spells that turn, causing any plan they had involving spells to shatter. That would definitely suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 My friends also think TCGPlayer is a good site. Does this friend also believe that world is flat. Anyway with the continous traps with trigger effects ruling this is even more ban worthy than it was before Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 I don't see why this card is considered broken but Royal Decree isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 I don't see why this card is considered broken but Royal Decree isn't.Traps can't be used the turn they are set, therefore would make Royal Decree less useful to activate when your opponent doesn't have any set cards. However, you can activate this card first turn and it will still hold value. Plus, this card can last as many turns as you want (even just one of your opponent's), but Royal Decree lasts until it's destroyed by another card's effect, meaning once it's activated you wont be able to use your own Traps, either. EDIT: Why did I say spells? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 I don't see why this card is considered broken but Royal Decree isn't. In addition to negating a much larger, faster, and often better portion of the opponent's deck, Imperial Order also has its token maintenance cost that allows you to turn it off at the start of your turn without it affecting you at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 Anyway with the continous traps with trigger effects ruling this is even more ban worthy than it was before 1) Trigger-like effects, not trigger effects.2) This card's effect is continuous. A player cannot decide to negate a spell card, they're just always negated, so chaining this card to a Spell has always been as effective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tickle Me Emo Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 a card that shuts down between 33 and 50 percent of the opponents deck isnt broken! You need to pay 700 LP per turn to keep it alive. -.- Fh-Fh your friends fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 It's funny, Marzbar is the main advocate of Imperial Order on TCGPlayer, yet I believe I remember him arguing that Cold Wave was limit-worthy or something. It's funny, because Order, at it's very worst, is a one-sided Cold Wave, and therefor massively powerful. If used when you don't have many spells around and your opponent does? It's just won you the duel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 It's funny' date=' Marzbar is the main advocate of Imperial Order on TCGPlayer, yet I believe I remember him arguing that Cold Wave was limit-worthy or something. It's funny, because Order, at it's very worst, is a one-sided Cold Wave, and therefor massively powerful. If used when you don't have many spells around and your opponent does? It's just won you the duel.[/quote'] Marzbar subscribes to the "R2" system of banlist theory, which reflects his level of understanding of the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 It should stay banned, but i would like it to get unbanned... itz de onle secrat rare i gotz :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 a card that shuts down between 33 and 50 percent of the opponents deck isnt broken! You need to pay 700 LP per turn to keep it alive. -.- Fh-Fh your friends fail. Maybe he knows that and just wants to show his friends that they fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tickle Me Emo Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 a card that shuts down between 33 and 50 percent of the opponents deck isnt broken! You need to pay 700 LP per turn to keep it alive. -.- Fh-Fh your friends fail. Maybe he knows that and just wants to show his friends that they fail. I said that, i never doubted for a minute that he didnt know it already. Fh-Fh is a good player, Fh-Fhs friends obviously are not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fh-Fh Posted September 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 a card that shuts down between 33 and 50 percent of the opponents deck isnt broken! You need to pay 700 LP per turn to keep it alive. -.- Fh-Fh your friends fail. Maybe he knows that and just wants to show his friends that they fail. I said that' date=' i never doubted for a minute that he didnt know it already. Fh-Fh is a good player, Fh-Fhs friends obviously are not.[/quote'] *Sniff* I didn't know you felt that way about me. Of course I'll marry you! Its funny, the friend who said it spent his college fund on cards. Making him hard as hell to beat with his stupid tele DAD deck (which he rufuses to call it that even though he has 3 E-Teles and 3 Krebons) EDIT: Oh yeah, by the way, Exiro was right. I mean about the me exploiting my friends on an online forum part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted September 25, 2008 Report Share Posted September 25, 2008 the friend who said it spent his college fund on cards. wut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fh-Fh Posted September 25, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2008 the friend who said it spent his college fund on cards. wut Yes. I was as suprised as you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted September 25, 2008 Report Share Posted September 25, 2008 the friend who said it spent his college fund on cards. wut Yes. I was as suprised as you. OH what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.