Guest Chaos Pudding Posted September 25, 2008 Report Share Posted September 25, 2008 Note that I am not saying that, if there was only 1 slot for a new banned card that this card should be banned over DAD/CCV. Instead, I'm asking if you could ban any number of cards next format, would you include Treeborn Frog in your bans. And then I'll compare this topic to the previous one I made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamief Posted September 25, 2008 Report Share Posted September 25, 2008 Nah its fine where it is. It almost has no effect in the meta atall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blade Knight Posted September 25, 2008 Report Share Posted September 25, 2008 It doesn't seem as dangerous as DAD or CCV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted September 25, 2008 Report Share Posted September 25, 2008 Yes treeborn's effect hasnt changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShinobiDark72 Posted September 25, 2008 Report Share Posted September 25, 2008 Regardless of whether or not it's doing something, it should be banned, Who knows? Konami might get smart and fix next format to the point where Treeborn is a threat, in which case it should be banned with the rest of the cards that get banned. Bottom line: Yes, It's banable under any circumstance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kale Posted September 25, 2008 Report Share Posted September 25, 2008 meh, i havnt seen much talk about it in a long time. when you see a discussion on decks and themes, most people are mainly going to LS, DaD, Glads, and Zombies. Treeborn frog, however fun it is to use in LS, isnt very effective in any of those decks... and Plants will have their own summoning power in Gigaplant and Lonefire, so it isnt needed their either. yeah, you get a basically free special summon. But that doesnt set up for much in this meta, and what the meta will be, from what i can see. ^note: that is my opinion, and anyone has the right to disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiff! Posted September 26, 2008 Report Share Posted September 26, 2008 i don't think Treeborn is bannable.it's not seen in many,if any,decks.though i do have one,i hardly use it.there are better conitional SS cars,like Wulf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted September 26, 2008 Report Share Posted September 26, 2008 i don't think Treeborn is bannable.it's not seen in many' date='if any,decks.though i do have one,i hardly use it.there are better conitional SS cars,like Wulf.[/quote'] Wulf = If you're lucky, you can Special Summon this once. Treeborn = Infinite tribute engine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted September 26, 2008 Report Share Posted September 26, 2008 It doesn't matter what meta we're in, a card that give almost infinite tribute is bad for the game, and as such should be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted September 26, 2008 Report Share Posted September 26, 2008 okay lets thik about it if you could ban every ban worthy card yes i would include the frog but righ tnow treeborn does not been to be banned as its not exactly useful in this meta Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted September 26, 2008 Report Share Posted September 26, 2008 okay lets thik about it if you could ban every ban worthy card yes i would include the frog but righ tnow treeborn does not been to be banned as its not exactly useful in this meta Admittedly, Treeborn Frog is far from the most broken card that is currently legal, and if we are given a limited number of changes to make to the banlist then banning it would be far from our first priority. But that doesn't change the underlying fact that it is banworthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted September 27, 2008 Report Share Posted September 27, 2008 I don't think it should be on the table with to much seriousness next format, there are much more important things to deal with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoPaladin2008 Posted September 27, 2008 Report Share Posted September 27, 2008 frog + dark dust spirit = win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azure Posted September 27, 2008 Report Share Posted September 27, 2008 Yes it should be banned because it's effect is very annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axiom_Nor Posted September 27, 2008 Report Share Posted September 27, 2008 I shall answer this question with a question and its answer: Question: Should the sun rise in the mornings, and set in the evenings? Answer: Not if UDE has any say in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted September 27, 2008 Report Share Posted September 27, 2008 I shall answer this question with a question and its answer: Question: Should the sun rise in the mornings' date=' and set in the evenings? Answer: Not if UDE has any say in it.[/quote'] Best answer to this question ever!Cookie for choo ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted September 28, 2008 Report Share Posted September 28, 2008 I shall answer this question with a question and its answer: Question: Should the sun rise in the mornings' date=' and set in the evenings? Answer: Not if UDE has any say in it.[/quote'] Best answer to this question ever!Cookie for choo ^^ Except that UDE doesn't have a say in it. Konami makes the list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.