Jump to content

Discussion : Pot Of Avarice


Recommended Posts

Deck fattening is bad. If it wasnt for the +1' date=' no one would use this card. Im not too sure about banworthiness of this card. Is a +1 with sort of the cost of having to return 5 monsters in your Graveyard to the Deck worth banning this card? That would be the question that needs to be asked.

[/quote']

 

tut tut tut, your not thinking about what i said, here's a clue what cards won't get returned to the deck when you use this card, and you will summon them alot during your duel?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this cost is now not a huge as it first was' date=' does this now need to be banned, because it is becoming a more helpful version of pot of greed.

[/quote']

 

To say that this is a Pot of Greed is proof that you haven't a clue why Pot of Greed was banned in the first place. There's a reason that Pot of Greed is banworthy while Chaos Greed is not.

 

Deck fattening is bad. If it wasnt for the +1' date=' no one would use this card. Im not too sure about banworthiness of this card. Is a +1 with sort of the cost of having to return 5 monsters in your Graveyard to the Deck worth banning this card? That would be the question that needs to be asked.

[/quote']

 

tut tut tut, your not thinking about what i said, here's a clue what cards won't get returned to the deck when you use this card, and you will summon them alot during your duel?

 

Are you trying to imply that this is broken with Synchros? Don't make me laugh; extra copies in your Extra Deck mean that you'll never run out of the important Synchro Monsters, and this card will still fatten your deck considerably. And it's still not exactly unsituational, since it does require five monsters in the grave, and then proceeds to deplete your graveyard, which is a bad thing. Also, God forbid we have theme support in circulation.

 

If not, then are you implying that it's broken with Gladiator Beasts? If you are, then I laugh at your pathetic argument. Gladiator Beasts would barely ever get five monsters in the graveyard before the duel's end, and even if they did so they would rather keep them there as Darius/Equeste targets. And again, God forbid we have theme support in circulation.

 

If you're not referencing Gladiator Beasts either, I don't know what you're talking about.

 

I saw this used well in a frog deck the other day' date=' with substitoad and poison draw frogs. Other than that it's pretty much absent in today's play.

[/quote']

 

Substitoad + Poison Draw Frog for massive draw doesn't work; it misses the timing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PikaPerson01

Can anyone see this in Gadgets? You play 2 of these with 2 Playsets of Gadgets.

 

Hi old banned guy! Your username makes it way obvious who you are. <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anyone see this in Gadgets? You play 2 of these with 2 Playsets of Gadgets.

 

Hi old banned guy! Your username makes it way obvious who you are. <_<

 

That means he's double accounting and then he shall be permabanned >_>.

 

He could of at least came up with a diferent name.. Sheesh, kids.

 

xD.

 

Anyway, as I said - Nobody would run this card if it wern't for the fact that it's a +2. Some idiots think that this card is good in Exodia decks, ect. ect.

 

Deck fattening is bad. Bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anyone see this in Gadgets? You play 2 of these with 2 Playsets of Gadgets.

 

Hi old banned guy! Your username makes it way obvious who you are. <_<

 

That means he's double accounting and then he shall be permabanned >_>.

 

He could of at least came up with a diferent name.. Sheesh' date=' kids.

 

xD.

 

Anyway, as I said - Nobody would run this card if it wern't for the fact that it's a [b']+1.[/b] Some idiots think that this card is good in Exodia decks, ect. ect.

 

Deck fattening is bad. Bad.

 

Fix'd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ITS HITLERS TRUE' date=' POT FORM RUN B4 THE POT NATZIS GET YOU =O

 

ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHH!

 

WERE ALL DOOMED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[/quote']

I lol'ed.

 

Who wants to hide a Pot Jew? Who wants to hide a Pot Jew?

 

This card should go with Izanami and Psychic Commander. Someone needs a deck based around those three.

Read Izanami backwards. It's a perfect match:).

I lol'ed once I found out what it was backwards.

 

Anyways, this card is meh, but deck fattener is deck fattener. REMEMBER, KIDS, THAT BEING FAT IS AS BAD IN YU-GI-OH AS IT IS IN REAL LIFE! SO EAT RIGHT!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PikaPerson01

They said it was spam' date=' but I couldn't remember spamming.

[/quote']

 

Hahaha. You spammed dozens of tons, and you even acknowledged spamming several times. This whole "playing dumb" thing doesn't work Sparky. Having no knowledge of the rules doesn't exclude you from following them.

 

On-topic: Pot of Avarice. I wouldn't main deck it. Not for this meta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...