.:pyramid:. Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 this cost is now not a huge as it first was, does this now need to be banned, because it is becoming a more helpful version of pot of greed. " Hitler in a Jar" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 Deck fattening is bad. If it wasnt for the +1, no one would use this card. Im not too sure about banworthiness of this card. Is a +1 with sort of the cost of having to return 5 monsters in your Graveyard to the Deck worth banning this card? That would be the question that needs to be asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fh-Fh Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 The original Hitler reference. I remember back in the day when everybody used these. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted October 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 Deck fattening is bad. If it wasnt for the +1' date=' no one would use this card. Im not too sure about banworthiness of this card. Is a +1 with sort of the cost of having to return 5 monsters in your Graveyard to the Deck worth banning this card? That would be the question that needs to be asked.[/quote'] tut tut tut, your not thinking about what i said, here's a clue what cards won't get returned to the deck when you use this card, and you will summon them alot during your duel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoPaladin2008 Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 oh dear god i see now >. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 ITS HITLERS TRUE, POT FORM RUN B4 THE POT NATZIS GET YOU =O ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHH! WERE ALL DOOMED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xemba Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 I saw this used well in a frog deck the other day, with substitoad and poison draw frogs. Other than that it's pretty much absent in today's play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 A card in your graveyard is a better resource then a card you never draw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 this cost is now not a huge as it first was' date=' does this now need to be banned, because it is becoming a more helpful version of pot of greed.[/quote'] To say that this is a Pot of Greed is proof that you haven't a clue why Pot of Greed was banned in the first place. There's a reason that Pot of Greed is banworthy while Chaos Greed is not. Deck fattening is bad. If it wasnt for the +1' date=' no one would use this card. Im not too sure about banworthiness of this card. Is a +1 with sort of the cost of having to return 5 monsters in your Graveyard to the Deck worth banning this card? That would be the question that needs to be asked.[/quote'] tut tut tut, your not thinking about what i said, here's a clue what cards won't get returned to the deck when you use this card, and you will summon them alot during your duel? Are you trying to imply that this is broken with Synchros? Don't make me laugh; extra copies in your Extra Deck mean that you'll never run out of the important Synchro Monsters, and this card will still fatten your deck considerably. And it's still not exactly unsituational, since it does require five monsters in the grave, and then proceeds to deplete your graveyard, which is a bad thing. Also, God forbid we have theme support in circulation. If not, then are you implying that it's broken with Gladiator Beasts? If you are, then I laugh at your pathetic argument. Gladiator Beasts would barely ever get five monsters in the graveyard before the duel's end, and even if they did so they would rather keep them there as Darius/Equeste targets. And again, God forbid we have theme support in circulation. If you're not referencing Gladiator Beasts either, I don't know what you're talking about. I saw this used well in a frog deck the other day' date=' with substitoad and poison draw frogs. Other than that it's pretty much absent in today's play.[/quote'] Substitoad + Poison Draw Frog for massive draw doesn't work; it misses the timing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesus Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 Nobody would run this card if wern't for the fact that it's a +2. Nobody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armageddonagain Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 Can anyone see this in Gadgets? You play 2 of these with 2 Playsets of Gadgets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 Can anyone see this in Gadgets? You play 2 of these with 2 Playsets of Gadgets. Hi old banned guy! Your username makes it way obvious who you are. <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesus Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 Can anyone see this in Gadgets? You play 2 of these with 2 Playsets of Gadgets. Hi old banned guy! Your username makes it way obvious who you are. <_< That means he's double accounting and then he shall be permabanned >_>. He could of at least came up with a diferent name.. Sheesh, kids. xD. Anyway, as I said - Nobody would run this card if it wern't for the fact that it's a +2. Some idiots think that this card is good in Exodia decks, ect. ect. Deck fattening is bad. Bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 Can anyone see this in Gadgets? You play 2 of these with 2 Playsets of Gadgets. Hi old banned guy! Your username makes it way obvious who you are. <_< That means he's double accounting and then he shall be permabanned >_>. He could of at least came up with a diferent name.. Sheesh' date=' kids. xD. Anyway, as I said - Nobody would run this card if it wern't for the fact that it's a [b']+1.[/b] Some idiots think that this card is good in Exodia decks, ect. ect. Deck fattening is bad. Bad. Fix'd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesus Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 Erhm. My bad.. Thanks skuldur >_>. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armageddonagain Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 Can anyone see this in Gadgets? You play 2 of these with 2 Playsets of Gadgets. Hi old banned guy! Your username makes it way obvious who you are. <_<I tried to make it obvious. As for the permaban, I didn't know that policy, so this account will be abandoned after I get my old one back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 Why did you lose your old one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armageddonagain Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 ^^^ I tried to find out, but I'm not sure why I got banned since I can't access my acconunt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 They really didn't give you a warning or an explanation first? That's odd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armageddonagain Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 They said it was spam, but I couldn't remember spamming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bury the year Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 This card should go with Izanami and Psychic Commander. Someone needs a deck based around those three. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armageddonagain Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 This card should go with Izanami and Psychic Commander. Someone needs a deck based around those three.Read Izanami backwards. It's a perfect match:). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrie Lupia Blitzer Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 ITS HITLERS TRUE' date=' POT FORM RUN B4 THE POT NATZIS GET YOU =O ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHH! WERE ALL DOOMED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![/quote']I lol'ed. Who wants to hide a Pot Jew? Who wants to hide a Pot Jew? This card should go with Izanami and Psychic Commander. Someone needs a deck based around those three.Read Izanami backwards. It's a perfect match:).I lol'ed once I found out what it was backwards. Anyways, this card is meh, but deck fattener is deck fattener. REMEMBER, KIDS, THAT BEING FAT IS AS BAD IN YU-GI-OH AS IT IS IN REAL LIFE! SO EAT RIGHT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 I like this in my Lightsworn Monarchs to reuse Wulves and get baqck some of the hand-advantage Lightsworn tends to blow so quickly. Other than that, it's terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 They said it was spam' date=' but I couldn't remember spamming.[/quote'] Hahaha. You spammed dozens of tons, and you even acknowledged spamming several times. This whole "playing dumb" thing doesn't work Sparky. Having no knowledge of the rules doesn't exclude you from following them. On-topic: Pot of Avarice. I wouldn't main deck it. Not for this meta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.