Dad Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 I searched the last 3 pages and did not see a discussion based on these two cards. Discuss. ~Xemnas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armageddon08 Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 PWWB is better because it can send any card to the top of your opponent's deck. But CED is good because it requires no cost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ Chidori-Kun Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 PWWB FTW But CED is just as good against fusions and syncs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 Compulsory Evac is better for dealing with Fusions and Synchros because it is cost free. PWWB can deal with anything so basically PWWB would win this since it is more versatile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted October 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 I agree. But based on Hand Advantage and Synchro-jabroni-slap, CED right? ~Xemnas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 I agree. But based on Hand Advantage and Synchro-b****-slap' date=' CED right? ~Xemnas[/quote'] Correct you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted October 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 Yayz, I'm right for once! Now to celebrate, right before I get my TCG a$$ handed to me in 3. . . 2. . . 1 ~Xemnas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 CED: -Costless-Gets rid of synchros and fusions-Can make opponent waste tributes or similar things. PWWB: -Discard cost-Also gets rid of synchros-Can make opponent waste tributes-Can create dead draws Seems about equal, though I think CED is more splashable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rise of the Eldrazi Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 PWWB because it returns anything. CED is just monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixty Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 I would use CED on Synchros, 'cause it's costless. I would use PWWB for... everything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 PWWB pwns anything, except if you use it on a sync or fusion it will only return to the extra deck, but does a dead draw which is awesome. CED does this for free, but no dead draw. and I think you can only have 1 PWWB but can have 3 CED. PWWB is a +1 or a 0+(if its a sync or fusion). CED is going to be a +1. so im thinking CED would win. Though I love dead draws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 Pros of CED: *Costless*Can be used on your own monsters Cons of CED: *Does not return to top of deck*Not spells/traps Pros of PWWB *Spells/Traps/Monsters*Extra advantage by placing on top of deck*Discard Malicious Cons of PWWB: *Cannot return your own monsters*Discard cost*Synchros/Fusions still go to Extra Deck (have to pay a cost to do what CED would do without cost) It's hard to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 PWWB is better because it makes the opponent lose 1 card while also slowing him down by spinning that card and it can somehow speed up your deck strategy by discarding, while Evacuation is just a simple bounce that sometimes doesn't even stall. However, if your deck doesn't need PWWB, it's sure worth maining/siding Evacuation because of Synchros. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.