Question about D-Hero Malicious

[RyanAtlus]

I have -Hero Malicious from the Duelist Pack and now it's worth €40,50. I heard the value will drop during the coming month.

Is it true?

[Skuldur]

Where did you hear that and why should it?

[tonisanoob]

urrm its worth about $60-ish

[「tea.leaf」]

urrm its worth about $60-ish

 

Why aren't you speaking in Pound Sterling?

[SephirothKirby]

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-

 

I thought this card was a Normal Rare.

 

Yu-Gi-Oh is much too expensive.

[CrabHelmet]

urrm its worth about $60-ish

 

Why aren't you speaking in Pound Sterling?

 

Why on earth should he be speaking in Pounds Sterling? The symbol in the first post denotes the Euro.

[~ P O L A R I S ~]

The only reason for it to drop in value over the coming month would be its Super Rare status in the new-ishly released Dark Legends packs, this is a fairly significant reason, but I doubt it will hurt the value of Malicious that much.

[GenzoTheHarpist]

It has taken a slight dip (as all cards do) since it has been reprinted.

[CrabHelmet]

If we get an emergency banlist, Tele-DAD could get weaker, which would drop its value. However, we probably won't get an emergency banlist this format.

 

And that's terrible.

[GenzoTheHarpist]

There are decks besides teledad that use Malicious such as Tricky Turbo.

[CrabHelmet]

There are decks besides teledad that use Malicious such as Tricky Turbo.

 

I fail to see how that stops Malicious's value from going down if and when Tele-DAD becomes weaker.

[GenzoTheHarpist]

Because people will still pay extravagant amounts to use it in non-teledad decks.

[CrabHelmet]

Because people will still pay extravagant amounts to use it in non-teledad decks.

 

There is a difference between "worth less" and "worthless".

[GenzoTheHarpist]

I'm saying that the price won't go down at all because other quick-synchro decks will become more popular and pick up the loss in buying.

[CrabHelmet]

I'm saying that the price won't go down at all because other quick-synchro decks will become more popular and pick up the loss in buying.

 

If Lightlords/Gladials/other decks not using Malicious gain any ground at all' date=' or the decks that use Malicious lose [i']any power, speed, or consistency at all[/i], the price of Malicious will decrease.

[Guest Chaos Pudding]

I think the TC is referring to the reprint of Malicious in Dark Legends. And, to answer your question, I don't see it dropping that much.

[GenzoTheHarpist]

I'm saying that the price won't go down at all because other quick-synchro decks will become more popular and pick up the loss in buying.

 

If Lightlords/Gladials/other decks not using Malicious gain any ground at all' date=' or the decks that use Malicious lose [i']any power, speed, or consistency at all[/i], the price of Malicious will decrease.

 

Nah. Other decks will pick up the slack. For instance Tricky turbo is unpopular, but if teledad is no longer a viable option, the people playing this variant will vastly increase and will spend the same extravagant amounts the teledad players were paying. The cost of Malicious is equal to what people are willing to pay for it, nothing more.

[~/Coolio Prime\~]

I'm saying that the price won't go down at all because other quick-synchro decks will become more popular and pick up the loss in buying.

 

If Lightlords/Gladials/other decks not using Malicious gain any ground at all' date=' or the decks that use Malicious lose [i']any power, speed, or consistency at all[/i], the price of Malicious will decrease.

 

Nah. Other decks will pick up the slack. For instance Tricky turbo is unpopular, but if teledad is no longer a viable option, the people playing this variant will vastly increase and will spend the same extravagant amounts the teledad players were paying. The cost of Malicious is equal to what people are willing to pay for it, nothing more.

Wouldn't they just use the second best deck instead of trying to use the same sort of deck?

[GenzoTheHarpist]

I'm saying that the price won't go down at all because other quick-synchro decks will become more popular and pick up the loss in buying.

 

If Lightlords/Gladials/other decks not using Malicious gain any ground at all' date=' or the decks that use Malicious lose [i']any power, speed, or consistency at all[/i], the price of Malicious will decrease.

 

Nah. Other decks will pick up the slack. For instance Tricky turbo is unpopular, but if teledad is no longer a viable option, the people playing this variant will vastly increase and will spend the same extravagant amounts the teledad players were paying. The cost of Malicious is equal to what people are willing to pay for it, nothing more.

Wouldn't they just use the second best deck instead of trying to use the same sort of deck?

No because in my opinion the top deck would still be in the teledad mold, you would have to ban a lot more to make that deck lose ground.

[Megaworm]

Or just ban Tele-DAD themed decks altogether. If the card is too close to the meta-raping decks then it cannot be allowed into the tournament.

[GenzoTheHarpist]

What cards exactly would you ban to do that?

[Megaworm]

Well, you can't use Dark Armed Dragon and Emergency Teleport, Destiny Hero Malicious, Dark Grepher, Plaguespreader Zombie, Crush Card Virus, Deck Devastation Virus, Eradicator Epidemic Virus, or/and Destiny Draw in the same deck.

 

An innacurate attempt at a loop/strategy/deckbuild ban. People could still use dark armed dragon, they just can't rape and ruin the meta with the same deck over and over again.

[Hamermathd]

OMFG! Since when was Malicious worth that much!?! My friend has 2 of them, I gotta get one off him!

[Megaworm]

since Tele-DAD and Destiny Hero decks began raping the tournaments of all diversity.

[Mr. Judgment Dragon]

OMFG! Since when was Malicious worth that much!?! My friend has 2 of them' date=' I gotta get one off him!

[/quote']

 

Malicious is useless using at 1.