Larxene Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 It was nice. There was no noobs (well not many) and everything wasn't so chaotic. You wouldn't know cause you weren't there. I was there More than 2 join a day You joined on July' date=' you wouldn't know. Besides way more then 2 join per day >.> Mikooo's calculations are somewhat much more near to the truth.[/quote'] Last time I checked, July was before October. Back when I joined the Member count was way below 100K. Also the Member to n00b Ratio was much better (Around 400:1 instead of 3000:1 which we have today) Convos were a lot more civilized and fun as well. These days we get Members who join' date=' post a few Crappy Cards or Attachments (Which I lock) and are never seen again. Also I notice that Members purposely sign up to take well known names.[/quote'] Like Larxene? (I swear it must be a double account.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krowbot Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 I remember when there was 500 members. That, was when the website was enjoyable. Anyways, atleast 40 a day =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
∮.Ғσяgσттeи.SσℓÐιєя.∮ Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 I remember when there was 500 members. That' date=' was when the website was enjoyable. Anyways, atleast 40 a day =/[/quote'] actually, 43.2 on average per day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krowbot Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 I remember when there was 500 members. That' date=' was when the website was enjoyable. Anyways, atleast 40 a day =/[/quote'] actually, 43.2 on average per day. I was close enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 I remember when there was 500 members. That' date=' was when the website was enjoyable. Anyways, atleast 40 a day =/[/quote'] actually, 43.2 on average per day. I was close enough. Yes, both of you iz smart ^_^ p.s Can't we get rid of unactive accounts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 It was nice. There was no noobs (well not many) and everything wasn't so chaotic. You wouldn't know cause you weren't there. I was there More than 2 join a day You joined on July' date=' you wouldn't know. Besides way more then 2 join per day >.> Mikooo's calculations are somewhat much more near to the truth.[/quote'] Last time I checked, July was before October. I joined in the end so I myself never knew it much besides I never saw him active during that time span which was what I meant when I said "he wouldn't know". It quite ended by Jan of 08 =/ I remember when there was 500 members. That' date=' was when the website was enjoyable. Anyways, atleast 40 a day =/[/quote'] actually, 43.2 on average per day. I was close enough. Yes, both of you iz smart ^_^ p.s Can't we get rid of unactive accounts? There is, YCMaker just wouldn't do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 ITT: Cynicism. Nuff said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaca Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 It's kinda mean stopping people joining but the site is too big. How about limited number online at once? Edit: Limited online would be anoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revan Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 Maybe there should be something that if the member is new, a moderator has to approve their post beore it actually goes public? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flexh Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 What post? most new members havn't posted yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revan Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 What I'm saying is that until a member has proven themselves to be a non-spammer, and not a noob either, his/her posts should be judged by a mod to see if they are worthy, or if it is spam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flexh Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 Oh now i get you do you think if a new member dosn't post in 6 or more months their account should be deleted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revan Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 No. What about the popular members who go off YCM for a break? if an unactivated account is not actived within 5 days of creation, it should be delted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krowbot Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 No. What about the popular members who go off YCM for a break? if an unactivated account is not actived within 5 days of creation' date=' it should be delted[/quote'] ...His post said "new" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 I checked how many an hour once (I was bored). The result was about 10 an hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fen. Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 What I'm saying is that until a member has proven themselves to be a non-spammer' date=' and not a noob either, his/her posts should be judged by a mod to see if they are worthy, or if it is spam.[/quote']That seems a little harsh........like bullying or something.........but if that's what the site has come to...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
∮.Ғσяgσттeи.SσℓÐιєя.∮ Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 What I'm saying is that until a member has proven themselves to be a non-spammer' date=' and not a noob either, his/her posts should be judged by a mod to see if they are worthy, or if it is spam.[/quote']That seems a little harsh........like bullying or something.........but if that's what the site has come to...... there is already something like that.Ever heard of Post moderation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fen. Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 What I'm saying is that until a member has proven themselves to be a non-spammer' date=' and not a noob either, his/her posts should be judged by a mod to see if they are worthy, or if it is spam.[/quote']That seems a little harsh........like bullying or something.........but if that's what the site has come to...... there is already something like that.Ever heard of Post moderation? Yeah, but it isn't done well enough apparently....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.arx Posted January 10, 2009 Report Share Posted January 10, 2009 Over 0 every day. Beat that. No other forum has that many join per day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Striker Posted January 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2009 Maybe a few big ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crystal Beast 123 Posted January 10, 2009 Report Share Posted January 10, 2009 I just wait 10 seconds, then refresh the page. BAM! New person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.