Jericho Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 [align=center][spoiler=LORE]This effect cannot be negated. This card is also treated as a Warrior-Type monster. This card cannot be destroyed by battle. Double any Battle Damage your opponent takes when this card destroys a monster by battle. This card inflicts Piercing damage. Here is all you need to know about the card's image.[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorc: The Dark One Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Why did you post the same card 3 times with a different pic on each one?anyway,9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted January 12, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Why did you post the same card 3 times with a different pic on each one?anyway' date='9.5/10[/quote'] Its alternate holos I'm trying out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Not too bad. Mostly relevant. Usually I hand out Fs but this is C+, B- quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorc: The Dark One Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Why did you post the same card 3 times with a different pic on each one?anyway' date='9.5/10[/quote'] Its alternate holos I'm trying out. oh okay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyfe. Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Cool! I like 'em a lot. Mmm...9/10 But it does have OCG errors, like you need the whole effect of Piercing Damage instead of just saying it inflicts Piercing Damage.When this card attacks a deffense position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the differene as battle damage to your opponent's Life Points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorc: The Dark One Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Why did you post the same card 3 times with a different pic on each one?anyway' date='9.5/10[/quote'] Its alternate holos I'm trying out. oh okay i like the 3rd one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted January 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkangel07 Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted January 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 7/10 Thanks, cause, you know, everyone just loves it when a n00b posts just a rating and nothing else. Thanks. That really helps me improve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
..:Grimmjow:.. Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 I like the holos and the effect! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 It's OK, your OCG and grammar seems off though. Also the pic could be better, 5/10:| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted January 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 It's OK' date=' your OCG and grammar seems off though. Also the pic could be better, 5/10:|[/quote'] 1. Would you mind telling me how my grammar is off?2. Unless the stock is exceptionally good, I only use fan art.3. Only 5/10? Wth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 Sorry if you think I underated you but here's where I see problems. This effect can not be negated. (Incorrct ocg, this needs to bve in a different place and worded, "The effect of this card cannot be negated." Cards don't use the phrase "Pierce Damage" either (as far as I know anyway). that's just the name that it's been given over time. You need to have, in brackets, about damage calculation behind "the can't destroyed by battle" bit. Also you'd be bette of using a pic from the cartoon rather than fan art. Overall it's just an average card in my opinion that's why I gave you 5. 5 is midway eg/ not good or bad. I'm sorry if my rate isn't as detailed as you'd like but I'm a bit tired. I'll edit it tomorrow when I have enough brains about me. Also there will be errors in what I wrote but the fact that there's a problem is legitamate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted January 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 Sorry if you think I underated you but here's where I see problems. This effect can not be negated. (Incorrct ocg' date=' this needs to bve in a different place and worded, "The effect of this card cannot be negated." Cards don't use the phrase "Pierce Damage" either (as far as I know anyway). that's just the name that it's been given over time. You need to have, in brackets, about damage calculation behind "the can't destroyed by battle" bit. Also you'd be bette of using a pic from the cartoon rather than fan art. Overall it's just an average card in my opinion that's why I gave you 5. 5 is midway eg/ not good or bad. I'm sorry if my rate isn't as detailed as you'd like but I'm a bit tired. I'll edit it tomorrow when I have enough brains about me. Also there will be errors in what I wrote but the fact that there's a problem is legitamate.[/quote'] I need to change the first sentence.The Pierce Damage wording is on Cyberdark Dragon.I don't need to change the thing about damage calculation. Look at Spirit Reaper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyfi Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 Decent PictureNice Holo'sGood OCGPretty good effect8/10Burst Legacy Approves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 Cyberdark Dragon was the only card to have that effect, and it wasn't continued since. They would errata him if anyone actually used him. And I'm not too sure if they still use that Battle Damage thing, seeing as it's already implied. As for pics, if you need a new one, this one could be decent with proper cropping and editing. http://www.freewebs.com/super_fusion/android18.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted January 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 Decent PictureNice Holo'sGood OCGPretty good effect8/10Burst Legacy Approves. Thanks for your approval. Cyberdark Dragon was the only card to have that effect' date=' and it wasn't continued since. They would errata him if anyone actually used him. And I'm not too sure if they still use that Battle Damage thing, seeing as it's already implied. As for pics, if you need a new one, this one could be decent with proper cropping and editing. http://www.freewebs.com/super_fusion/android18.jpg[/quote'] Well as long as its on a card that hasn't since been errata'd, its free game. And I'm not looking for a new pic, but thanks anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 Not really, as cards after it have not used the terminology. It was a one time mistake UDE made when they thought all cards would follow that format. Honestly, I don't care, but I'm just saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 The Pierce Damage thing does need to be changed, I checked a few cards and the brand new "Black Feather - Blast of Black Lance" doesn't say it. There's a few more new ones but it would take me a while to write them all down. I think I might be wrong about the brackets thing though. I'd put it in but I don't think it's nessecery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Hyde Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 it's funny, i've never heard of Piercing damage. And the first sentence needs to be like after an effect. 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iParianos Posted January 15, 2009 Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 [align=center][spoiler=LORE]This effect cannot be negated. This card is also treated as a Warrior-Type monster. This card cannot be destroyed by battle. Double any Battle Damage your opponent takes when this card destroys a monster by battle. This card inflicts Piercing damage. Here is all you need to know about the card's image.[/align] i like it your good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thatweirdkid Posted January 15, 2009 Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 good cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.