Guest Star Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 http://www.metagame.com/yugioh.aspx?tabid=61&EventId=212 Well, even though I didn't see a Deck List, I'm guessing Suarez used Tele-DaD. It says that Shonen Jump Houston is less than one week away, and I'm hoping that Lightsworn can finally win one. So, discuss the results and your predictions for SJC Houston. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Well' date=' even though I didn't see a Deck List, I'm guessing Suarez used Tele-DaD.[/quote'] "Suarez played nothing but TeleDAD mirror matches all day long." I didn't see a Deck List either, but I'm pretty sure that means he ran it. On-topic: He looks like someone I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skarlet Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Though Lightsworn' date=' Gladiator Beasts, Corn Monarchs, and Zombies all made the Day 2 tables, Suarez played nothing but TeleDAD [b']mirror matches[/b] all day long. yeah he played tele-dad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Well' date=' even though I didn't see a Deck List, I'm guessing Suarez used Tele-DaD.[/quote'] "Suarez played nothing but TeleDAD mirror matches all day long." I didn't see a Deck List either, but I'm pretty sure that means he ran it. On-topic: He looks like someone I know. [qoute 'metagame']Though Lightsworn' date=' Gladiator Beasts, Corn Monarchs, and Zombies all made the Day 2 tables, Suarez played nothing but TeleDAD [b']mirror matches[/b] all day long.[/qoute] yeah he played tele-dad Ok, so I made a mistake. Sue me. I'm surprised that Corn Monarchs made the Top 16, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skarlet Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 dun worry mate, I'm just pointing it out, and it doesnt supprise me that a T-DAD won it, do they ever not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Meh. Another tourney, another day for DAD. /thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Nostracrabbus the Prophet predicts March 2009 format: E-Tele to 1Krebons to 2Malicious to 2DAD to 1Allure to 2Stardust to 1Breaker to 0Imperial Order to 1MoF to 1DDWL to 2 I am correct nine times out of ten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skarlet Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 krebons to 2? the entire issue with krebons is E-tele, it's attack stoping effect realy doesnt accomplish jack crap with all the removal available. Breaker to 0, I dont realy know why it was banned in the first place, all it is is a DARK-Spellcaster-Overdrive-Meets-MST, personaly I feel MST could be higher then 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 krebons to 2? the entire issue with krebons is E-tele' date=' it's attack stoping effect realy doesnt accomplish jack crap with all the removal available.[/quote'] As if Konami cares about that. It's being used, therefore it has a good chance of being hit. Breaker to 0' date='[/quote'] It goes through a revolving door between 0 and 1 every six months. I dont realy know why it was banned in the first place' date=' all it is is a DARK-Spellcaster-Overdrive-Meets-MST,[/quote'] MST does not then kill a monster or swing for 1/5 LP. Also, MST's presence does not completely crush the playability of non-chainables. personaly I feel MST could be higher then 1. Good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chevalier Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Winning DeckList: Alejandro V Reyes SuarezMonsters: 183 Destiny Hero - Malicious1 Destiny Hero - Doom Lord1 Destiny Hero - Diamond Dude1 Elemental Hero Stratos1 Dark Grepher1 Armageddon Knight1 Necro Gardna2 Dark Armed Dragon1 Plaguespreader Zombie1 D.D. Crow1 Sangan1 Snipe Hunter3 Krebons Spells: 153 Emergency Teleport3 Reinforcements of the Army3 Destiny Draw3 Allure of Darkness1 Monster Reborn1 Heavy Storm1 Brain Control Traps: 7 3 Phoenix Wing Wind Blast1 Crush Card Virus1 Mirror Force1 Torrential Tribute1 Return from the Different Dimension Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 I find it amazing he won without Solemn Judgment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 inb4readin'restofmetagame Maybe he just was lucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Nostracrabbus the Prophet predicts March 2009 format: E-Tele to 1Krebons to 2Malicious to 2DAD to 1Allure to 2Stardust to 1Breaker to 0Imperial Order to 1MoF to 1DDWL to 2 I am correct nine times out of ten. If Krebons gets moved to 2. Then Konami can go suck my balls =/If Imperial Order gets moved to 1, i will cryIf Stardust Dragon gets moved to 1.... like honestly, you only need 1 to dominate =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skarlet Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Stardust is a 3 or 0 card IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteNight Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 too bad lightsworn didn't make it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Nostracrabbus the Prophet predicts March 2009 format: E-Tele to 1Krebons to 2Malicious to 2DAD to 1Allure to 2Stardust to 1Breaker to 0Imperial Order to 1MoF to 1DDWL to 2 I am correct nine times out of ten. What about the OCG? Zombies and Priest OTK are a big problem over there. I hope konami goes berserk and repeat what they did to the tsuku-lock deck. (i.e. ban and limit a crapload of cards) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 Nostracrabbus the Prophet predicts March 2009 format: E-Tele to 1Krebons to 2Malicious to 2DAD to 1Allure to 2Stardust to 1Breaker to 0Imperial Order to 1MoF to 1DDWL to 2 I am correct nine times out of ten. What about the OCG? Zombies and Priest OTK are a big problem over there. Is that so? Well then: Zombie World to 2Zombie Master to 1Il Blud to 2Carrier to 2Summon Priest to 1Airbellum to 2Rescue Cat to 1Dark Dive Bomber to 2Mezuki to 1Tribe-Infecting Virus to 1 I hope konami goes berserk and repeat what they did to the tsuku-lock deck. (i.e. ban and limit a crapload of cards) That would be nice, especially since Konami usually bans the right cards; less than five cards currently on the banned list are even debatable. Of course, two of those were used in Tsuku-lock... >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chevalier Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 Stardust is a 3 or 0 card No, not really. But of course, that's your opinion. I'm surprised of the Armageddon Knight and Gardna. :\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 Stardust is a 3 or 0 card No' date=' not really. But of course, that's your opinion.[/quote'] I'd love to hear your justification for why it is not a 3-or-0 card. But I'm guessing that, as usual, you're going to claim to have given the matter deep thought, laugh at everyone for foolishly assuming that you are not secretly a genius, and then refuse to actually supply any of your "logic". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 I think it's good that GB's are in the top 16 again. I know that they're not in the top 8 or 4, but I still think that seeing them make the top 16 will give some people the courage to try out some variation of them(anything seems more interesting than a stale TeleDAD build). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chevalier Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 I'd love to hear your justification for why it is not a 3-or-0 card. But I'm guessing that' date=' as usual, you're going to claim to have given the matter deep thought, laugh at everyone for foolishly assuming that you are not secretly a genius, and then refuse to actually supply any of your "logic".[/quote'] 3rd Stardust is a waste of time. You'll almost never summon the third. There are cards you have a higher probability of using than 3 Stardust that you need space for, such as Doomkaiser/Ha Des or Tempest. Running Dust at 3 is overkill. For someone who prides himself at being good at this game, you should know that. But, then again, you pride yourself at being better than YCM players, so there's not much there to start with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 You agree you don't need three to run it correctly, that seems to me to underscore why limiting or semi-limiting it would be meaningless. So it seems more like you agree it's a 3-or-0 card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 I'd love to hear your justification for why it is not a 3-or-0 card. But I'm guessing that' date=' as usual, you're going to claim to have given the matter deep thought, laugh at everyone for foolishly assuming that you are not secretly a genius, and then refuse to actually supply any of your "logic".[/quote'] 3rd Stardust is a waste of time. You'll almost never summon the third. There are cards you have a higher probability of using than 3 Stardust that you need space for, such as Doomkaiser/Ha Des or Tempest. Running Dust at 3 is overkill. For someone who prides himself at being good at this game, you should know that. But, then again, you pride yourself at being better than YCM players, so there's not much there to start with. "3-or-0" never refers to how many copies you should run; it refers to proper banlist position. Stop throwing around terms that you don't understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chevalier Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 3-or-0 can refer to how many copies you can run and , in this case, I interpreted it as such. :\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 I don't really hear it being used that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.