Hobbes96 Posted January 27, 2009 Report Share Posted January 27, 2009 sorry for no holo...no time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 tuner should be Tuner. Standby Phase should be Standby Phases in this context. Everything else seems in order. A balanced theme-specific support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobbes96 Posted January 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 I hate rarity on synchros. Idea is pretty well thought out though. not bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
De pharoah Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 good card, apart from the pic, the flames cover it up (sorry)9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kotaro Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 it is kinda good, although the flames do cover up the knight but it doesnt really matter much The ocg is pretty good although tuner should be Tuner i believe and at the end of the first sentence, i "think" Phase should be Phases, it makes more senseother than that its good, 9.6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
302930 Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 Well balanced original card. Good job:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Namo™ Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 Great card 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spire Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 You do not need a holo to create a good card. The card itself, is balanced, good job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tiger Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 -Pic is nice-Effect is nice-OCG is good-Very balanced Card -Tiger's Overall Rating: 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobbes96 Posted January 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 sweet thanx peeps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ Chidori-Kun Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 Needs an IMG Credit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitchblack64 Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 cool but ive seen the pic a lot though sweet card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedJustice Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 The first sentence should read "The controller of this card must pay 1000 Life Points during each of his/her Standby Phases." As for the second part, you should probably use counters for that. Something like "The controller of this card must pay 1000 Life Points during each of his/her Standby Phases and add 1 counter to this card. Once per turn, you can Special Summon a monster with an ATK equal to or less than the number of counters on this card x 1000." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobbes96 Posted January 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 30, 2009 no...it isn't paying, it is losing.also, art is by fatherwolf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyPooBoy Posted January 30, 2009 Report Share Posted January 30, 2009 2 OCG errors. It could be a real card. 9.5/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedJustice Posted January 30, 2009 Report Share Posted January 30, 2009 no...it isn't paying' date=' it is losing.also, art is by fatherwolf[/quote'] If it's not paying, then why does the last sentence say "The amount of life points PAID with this card's effect"? AFAIK, there's no such thing as "Losing" life points. Just "paying" them, and "inflicting points of direct damage" to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobbes96 Posted January 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 30, 2009 good point. maybe will edit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N00B Hunter Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 You don't "lose" LP, you either "pay" the LP or your current amount is "decreased". (so, "The controller of this card decreases his/her Life Points by 1000 during each of his/her Standby Phases."). Secondly, there's not a lot of FIRE Tuners, and the ones that are Tuners are either pretty weak (namely "Nitro Synchron" and "Magna Drago") or very rare ("Rose, Warrior of Revenge"). The rest of the FIRE Tuner Monsters are Japanese or nonexistant. I don't see much use with a card like this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.