PrometheusMFD Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Criticism is much appreciatedOnce per turn, you can equip this card to a Dragon-Type monster as an equip card, OR unequip it to Special Summon this card on your side of the field. When a monster equipped with this card destroyes a monster your opponent controls by battle, place 1 Glory Counter on this card. (A monster can only be equipped with 1 Union monster at a time. If the equipped monster would be destroyed, destroy this card instead.) For each Glory Counter on this card, increase this card's level by 1, and its ATK by 300. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrometheusMFD Posted February 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 New Card addedThis card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by Tributing 1 "The Glory Fish" with 5 or more Glory Counters. This card's Level is equal to the Level of the "The Glory Fish" used to Summon this card. For each "The Glory Fish" in the Graveyard when this card is Summoned, you can place Glory Counters on this card equal to this card's level. This card's Original ATK is equal to the number of Glory Counters on this card times 500. When your opponent activates a Spell or Trap Card, you can remove 2 Glory Counters from this card to negate its activation and destroy it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 neat effect, is the pic supposed to look non-threatening? 9.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrometheusMFD Posted February 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Of which one?They are both supposed to be sort of a nice looking creature Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Of which one?They are both supposed to be sort of a nice looking creature I was referring to the 1st. Both look great, just not threatening Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrometheusMFD Posted February 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 ThanksThey weren't supposed to be...Is the second one's effect too vague? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 not to me it wasn't. Did you think it was? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrometheusMFD Posted February 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 I dunnoI guess I am a little paranoid about stuff like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 you worry too much on the pics. Now, on the other hand had you put up a Simpsons type fish, I would have said otherwise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrometheusMFD Posted February 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 I'm a perfectionist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.