chainsaw20x6 Posted February 12, 2009 Report Share Posted February 12, 2009 People would probally use ben kei over this.From epilogue.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tormented Posted February 12, 2009 Report Share Posted February 12, 2009 not a syncrho monster/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EliminateHRN Posted February 12, 2009 Report Share Posted February 12, 2009 Pic Credit???????? What's the summoning requirements (the Tuner + the other monsters). Effect should be (I think):"{summoning requirements}When this card attacks a monster on your opponent's side of the field, inflict 1000 of damage to your opponent's Life Points for each Equipped Spell Card on this card." I might have got the effect wrong. I'm not good with OCG. Rating: 5.9/10. Needs image credit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chainsaw20x6 Posted February 12, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 12, 2009 Pic Credit???????? What's the summoning requirements (the Tuner + the other monsters). Effect should be (I think):"{summoning requirements}When this card attacks a monster on your opponent's side of the field' date=' inflict 1000 of damage to your opponent's Life Points for each Equipped Spell Card on this card." I might have got the effect wrong. I'm not good with OCG. Rating: 5.9/10. Needs image credit.[/quote'] the OCG is based on the maha valio OCGPic Credit???????? What's the summoning requirements (the Tuner + the other monsters). Effect should be (I think):"{summoning requirements}When this card attacks a monster on your opponent's side of the field' date=' inflict 1000 of damage to your opponent's Life Points for each Equipped Spell Card on this card." I might have got the effect wrong. I'm not good with OCG. Rating: 5.9/10. Needs image credit.[/quote'] the OCG is based on the maha valio OCG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doom™ Posted February 12, 2009 Report Share Posted February 12, 2009 not a syncrho monster/10 And Google is not image credit... You have to post link to the site it came from.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FateTheSeer Posted February 12, 2009 Report Share Posted February 12, 2009 well i like it although its a bit over powered maybe if u reduced the damage slightly like 500 points that way if u made a direct attack then the max damage it could do would be 5000 alltho depending on if ur opponant had equipped it with any it could be more over all as its a bit over powered i will give it a 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legendhiro Posted February 13, 2009 Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 its a little too strong, especially since it has pretty high attack to begin with and then you will obviously be running a bunch of equips to benefit its effect, and they will beef it up more. lower attack to maybe 1900. yes i know this is low for its level, but it would balance it out (especially since synchros really aren't too hard to summon). either way i like the concept and have already come up with seven deck variations that could really use/abuse this card. 8.9/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted February 13, 2009 Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 No. Just no. This is banworthy for the same reason Ben Kei is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legendhiro Posted February 13, 2009 Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 maybe lower the damage a little bit. even lowering it to 900 would make a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted February 13, 2009 Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 maybe lower the damage a little bit. even lowering it to 900 would make a difference. No it wouldn't.This card can be 0/0 and have the same effect... Easy burn is easy burn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legendhiro Posted February 13, 2009 Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 maybe lower the damage a little bit. even lowering it to 900 would make a difference. No it wouldn't.This card can be 0/0 and have the same effect... Easy burn is easy burn. so you're saying that if your opponent has 5000 lp and a defense mon and this card attacks with 5 equips that the outcome will be the same between 1000 damage/equip and 900 damage/card? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted February 13, 2009 Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 maybe lower the damage a little bit. even lowering it to 900 would make a difference. No it wouldn't.This card can be 0/0 and have the same effect... Easy burn is easy burn. so you're saying that if your opponent has 5000 lp and a defense mon and this card attacks with 5 equips that the outcome will be the same between 1000 damage/equip and 900 damage/card? Yes it would.Because the damage is a result of an Effect on the attack, it says nothing on whether or not it had to succeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legendhiro Posted February 13, 2009 Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 that's true, but less damage is still less damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chainsaw20x6 Posted February 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 about this being overpowered, compared to ben kei its not, and nobody runs decks based on equips (execpt ben kei) it takes some effort to equip it with enough equips to otk or such with it, its harder to summon than ben kei Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted February 13, 2009 Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 that's true' date=' but less damage is still less damage.[/quote'] Less battle damage doesn't equal less effect damage. And this thing doesn't care for battle damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deloge Posted February 13, 2009 Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 Hmm... Not bad! Love the image Me rate 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legendhiro Posted February 13, 2009 Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 that's true' date=' but less damage is still less damage.[/quote'] Less battle damage doesn't equal less effect damage. And this thing doesn't care for battle damage. true. i concede the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.