Juuzou Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Yeah' date=' um, I am still a mod lol.. so um lets drop the personal attacks?[/quote'] oops, i didn't mean to offend you in any way please don't hurt me Morerator Sir. i was just saying it is a waste to be emotionally attached to anything besides yourself. and i didn't mean to call you fat if i did xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legendhiro Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 sorry blood. i don't know what i'd do if my dog was killed. i'd probably kill the drunk f*cker. its called get over it' date=' its just a dog -.-"[/quote'] dude' date=' I've had 4 dogs die since I was 4 o.o its JUST a dog, [b']GET OVER IT[/b] whatever your reasons for saying this, you're an insensitive a**. Sue him. The post fairy must not have told you.But we are filing three law suits. good. he deserves it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Jono Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 My uncle has a puppy and I love playing fetch and stuff with it. I couldn't bear it if it died. I'm sorry Bloodrun. =( its called get over it' date=' its just a dog -.-"[/quote'] Get the f*** of YCM and go jump of a cliff and die like the heartless monster you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 sorry blood. i don't know what i'd do if my dog was killed. i'd probably kill the drunk f*cker. its called get over it' date=' its just a dog -.-"[/quote'] dude' date=' I've had 4 dogs die since I was 4 o.o its JUST a dog, [b']GET OVER IT[/b] whatever your reasons for saying this, you're an insensitive a**. Sue him. The post fairy must not have told you.But we are filing three law suits. good. he deserves it. I'l glad to hear of the law suits. He better not get away with this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Sorry about your loss...and 1000 dollars on a dog? o.o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmegaWave Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Geez man...this just isnt your week is it? Dog run over AND You're losing your cable. I feel for ya dude. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 1. buy a new dog2. train the dog to kill3. unleash the dog4.???????5.Profet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spire Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Sorry to hear that...things like that happen unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Will you all stop attacking sharneeda already? He has a point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Drunks are fine, provided they are no way near animals, cars, machinery, fragile objects and important civilization in general. Oh, wait.Edit: I never get hit by the money side of things like this since all the dogs I've lost (and will get) are either bread or adopted (probably from a rescue centre). LOL BREAD LOL I KNOW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Drunks are fine' date=' provided they are no way near animals, cars, machinery, fragile objects and important civilization in general. Oh, wait.Edit: I never get hit by the money side of things like this since all the dogs I've lost (and will get) are either bread or adopted (probably from a rescue centre). LOL BREAD LOL I KNOW[/quote'] I'm surprised people allowed the guy to get behind the wheel in the very first place while drunk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Drunks are fine' date=' provided they are no way near animals, cars, machinery, fragile objects and important civilization in general. Oh, wait.Edit: I never get hit by the money side of things like this since all the dogs I've lost (and will get) are either bread or adopted (probably from a rescue centre). LOL BREAD LOL I KNOW[/quote'] I'm surprised people allowed the guy to get behind the wheel in the very first place while drunk These "people" were probably also drunk. You're surprised? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Drunks are fine' date=' provided they are no way near animals, cars, machinery, fragile objects and important civilization in general. Oh, wait.Edit: I never get hit by the money side of things like this since all the dogs I've lost (and will get) are either bread or adopted (probably from a rescue centre). LOL BREAD LOL I KNOW[/quote'] I'm surprised people allowed the guy to get behind the wheel in the very first place while drunk These "people" were probably also drunk. You're surprised? I was still expecting them to have some sort of common sense, but I'm probably giving them too much credit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Drunks are fine' date=' provided they are no way near animals, cars, machinery, fragile objects and important civilization in general. Oh, wait.Edit: I never get hit by the money side of things like this since all the dogs I've lost (and will get) are either bread or adopted (probably from a rescue centre). LOL BREAD LOL I KNOW[/quote'] I'm surprised people allowed the guy to get behind the wheel in the very first place while drunk These "people" were probably also drunk. You're surprised? I was still expecting them to have some sort of common sense, but I'm probably giving them too much credit No, it's called the drunk man thought he'd be fine driving home while intoxicated and found out that he accidentally killed someone's dog. So, in other words, it's not the person who gave the man his liscence that is as fault here, it's actually the drunk driver's fault. Here's alittle deductive reasoning for Bloodrun. --If you didn't the let the dog out of the house, then he wouldn't have been ran over. --If the drunk man never drove home, then the dog wouldn't have been ran over. --If you didn't post this on a forum on the internet, then you would be a smarter person. --If ragnorak could think about something, then he wouldn't fail as much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted February 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Here's alittle deductive reasoning for Bloodrun. --If you didn't the let the dog out of the house' date=' then he wouldn't have been ran over. --If the drunk man never drove home, then the dog wouldn't have been ran over. --If you didn't post this on a forum on the internet, then you would be a smarter person. --If ragnorak could think about something, then he wouldn't fail as much.[/quote'] Lol, I could SO turn this around and tear you a new one. But I'll save it for later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Here's alittle deductive reasoning for Bloodrun. --If you didn't the let the dog out of the house' date=' then he wouldn't have been ran over. --If the drunk man never drove home, then the dog wouldn't have been ran over. --If you didn't post this on a forum on the internet, then you would be a smarter person. --If ragnorak could think about something, then he wouldn't fail as much.[/quote'] Lol, I could SO turn this around and tear you a new one. But I'll save it for later. Actually, you can't really turn it around by much. I know that you must have had to let your dog out of the house because he/she probably needed to take a big crap, wandered into the street and then got hit. The real message was actually the third one. So, pay more attention to that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted February 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Here's alittle deductive reasoning for Bloodrun. --If you didn't the let the dog out of the house' date=' then he wouldn't have been ran over. --If the drunk man never drove home, then the dog wouldn't have been ran over. --If you didn't post this on a forum on the internet, then you would be a smarter person. --If ragnorak could think about something, then he wouldn't fail as much.[/quote'] Lol, I could SO turn this around and tear you a new one. But I'll save it for later. Actually, you can't really turn it around by much. I know that you must have had to let your dog out of the house because he/she probably needed to take a big crap, wandered into the street and then got hit. The real message was actually the third one. So, pay more attention to that one. Oh well, I already knew that, but now you have given me a reason too =D --If you didn't the let the dog out of the house, then he wouldn't have been ran over. The dog was in the backyard, doing her daily duties (I didn't let her out). The guy drove through are backyard and pinned my dog to the tree. --If the drunk man never drove home, then the dog wouldn't have been ran over. um.. No sheet, really? I suppose the tooth fairy isn't real either? --If you didn't post this on a forum on the internet, then you would be a smarter person. As opposed to what? One who complains about everything and constantly wines and how bad his life sucks? I'll take ignorance over you, ANY DAY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Here's alittle deductive reasoning for Bloodrun. --If you didn't the let the dog out of the house' date=' then he wouldn't have been ran over. --If the drunk man never drove home, then the dog wouldn't have been ran over. --If you didn't post this on a forum on the internet, then you would be a smarter person. --If ragnorak could think about something, then he wouldn't fail as much.[/quote'] Lol, I could SO turn this around and tear you a new one. But I'll save it for later. Actually, you can't really turn it around by much. I know that you must have had to let your dog out of the house because he/she probably needed to take a big crap, wandered into the street and then got hit. The real message was actually the third one. So, pay more attention to that one. Oh well, I already knew that, but now you have given me a reason too =D --If you didn't the let the dog out of the house, then he wouldn't have been ran over. The dog was in the backyard, doing her daily duties (I didn't let her out). The guy drove through are backyard and pinned my dog to the tree. --If the drunk man never drove home, then the dog wouldn't have been ran over. um.. No s***, really? I suppose the tooth fairy isn't real either? --If you didn't post this on a forum on the internet, then you would be a smarter person. As opposed to what? One who complains about everything and constantly wines and how bad his life sucks? I'll take ignorance over you, ANY DAY. Nice, drama on a childrens site against me now! Sounds like fun. How about this... Move on,The Drunk guy was an idiot. Would it help if I said I had no sympathy for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted February 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 Here's alittle deductive reasoning for Bloodrun. --If you didn't the let the dog out of the house' date=' then he wouldn't have been ran over. --If the drunk man never drove home, then the dog wouldn't have been ran over. --If you didn't post this on a forum on the internet, then you would be a smarter person. --If ragnorak could think about something, then he wouldn't fail as much.[/quote'] Lol, I could SO turn this around and tear you a new one. But I'll save it for later. Actually, you can't really turn it around by much. I know that you must have had to let your dog out of the house because he/she probably needed to take a big crap, wandered into the street and then got hit. The real message was actually the third one. So, pay more attention to that one. Oh well, I already knew that, but now you have given me a reason too =D --If you didn't the let the dog out of the house, then he wouldn't have been ran over. The dog was in the backyard, doing her daily duties (I didn't let her out). The guy drove through are backyard and pinned my dog to the tree. --If the drunk man never drove home, then the dog wouldn't have been ran over. um.. No s***, really? I suppose the tooth fairy isn't real either? --If you didn't post this on a forum on the internet, then you would be a smarter person. As opposed to what? One who complains about everything and constantly wines and how bad his life sucks? I'll take ignorance over you, ANY DAY. Nice, drama on a childrens site against me now! Sounds like fun. How about this... Move on,The Drunk guy was an idiot. Would it help if I said I had no sympathy for you? Wow, it takes you forever to catch on to the drift of things. I moved on the minute I posted this thread. Where the hell have you been? Again, I am not looking for sympathy. Besides, we all know that if were you that this happened to, there would 3 new poems from you dedicated to your dog, a love song, and a pro obituary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 Here's alittle deductive reasoning for Bloodrun. --If you didn't the let the dog out of the house' date=' then he wouldn't have been ran over. --If the drunk man never drove home, then the dog wouldn't have been ran over. --If you didn't post this on a forum on the internet, then you would be a smarter person. --If ragnorak could think about something, then he wouldn't fail as much.[/quote'] Lol, I could SO turn this around and tear you a new one. But I'll save it for later. Actually, you can't really turn it around by much. I know that you must have had to let your dog out of the house because he/she probably needed to take a big crap, wandered into the street and then got hit. The real message was actually the third one. So, pay more attention to that one. Oh well, I already knew that, but now you have given me a reason too =D --If you didn't the let the dog out of the house, then he wouldn't have been ran over. The dog was in the backyard, doing her daily duties (I didn't let her out). The guy drove through are backyard and pinned my dog to the tree. --If the drunk man never drove home, then the dog wouldn't have been ran over. um.. No s***, really? I suppose the tooth fairy isn't real either? --If you didn't post this on a forum on the internet, then you would be a smarter person. As opposed to what? One who complains about everything and constantly wines and how bad his life sucks? I'll take ignorance over you, ANY DAY. Nice, drama on a childrens site against me now! Sounds like fun. How about this... Move on,The Drunk guy was an idiot. Would it help if I said I had no sympathy for you? Wow, it takes you forever to catch on to the drift of things. I moved on the minute I posted this thread. Where the hell have you been? Again, I am not looking for sympathy. Besides, we all know that if were you that this happened to, there would 3 new poems from you dedicated to your dog, a love song, and a pro obituary. Actually, my old dog passed away last week. Did anyone online hear about that til now? No, because I have the understanding to keep my private life off the forums now. Apparently not with you. If you didn't post this thread to get sympathy then what did you post it for? Post count? Spam? And if it takes you the idea of posting a thread about it to move on from it then you have some pretty poor ways of moving on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ғαlşє 0ρρяєşşịợи Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 Here's alittle deductive reasoning for Bloodrun. --If you didn't the let the dog out of the house' date=' then he wouldn't have been ran over. --If the drunk man never drove home, then the dog wouldn't have been ran over. --If you didn't post this on a forum on the internet, then you would be a smarter person. --If ragnorak could think about something, then he wouldn't fail as much.[/quote'] Lol, I could SO turn this around and tear you a new one. But I'll save it for later. Actually, you can't really turn it around by much. I know that you must have had to let your dog out of the house because he/she probably needed to take a big crap, wandered into the street and then got hit. The real message was actually the third one. So, pay more attention to that one. Oh well, I already knew that, but now you have given me a reason too =D --If you didn't the let the dog out of the house, then he wouldn't have been ran over. The dog was in the backyard, doing her daily duties (I didn't let her out). The guy drove through are backyard and pinned my dog to the tree. --If the drunk man never drove home, then the dog wouldn't have been ran over. um.. No s***, really? I suppose the tooth fairy isn't real either? --If you didn't post this on a forum on the internet, then you would be a smarter person. As opposed to what? One who complains about everything and constantly wines and how bad his life sucks? I'll take ignorance over you, ANY DAY. Nice, drama on a childrens site against me now! Sounds like fun. How about this... Move on,The Drunk guy was an idiot. Would it help if I said I had no sympathy for you? Wow, it takes you forever to catch on to the drift of things. I moved on the minute I posted this thread. Where the hell have you been? Again, I am not looking for sympathy. Besides, we all know that if were you that this happened to, there would 3 new poems from you dedicated to your dog, a love song, and a pro obituary. Actually, my old dog passed away last week. Did anyone online hear about that til now? No, because I have the understanding to keep my private life off the forums now. Apparently not with you. If you didn't post this thread to get sympathy then what did you post it for? Post count? Spam? And if it takes you the idea of posting a thread about it to move on from it then you have some pretty poor ways of moving on. Probably for attention T.T Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tiger Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 That poor innocent dog. =( I'm so sorry that this happened to you. i love animals and hate to hear about dead ones. I hate drunk people. <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 @Sharneeda: Wanting attention is the same thing as wanting sympathy, that's why I didn't say that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ғαlşє 0ρρяєşşịợи Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 @Sharneeda: Wanting attention is the same thing as wanting sympathy' date=' that's why I didn't say that.[/quote'] You have a very good point there ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted February 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 Here's alittle deductive reasoning for Bloodrun. --If you didn't the let the dog out of the house' date=' then he wouldn't have been ran over. --If the drunk man never drove home, then the dog wouldn't have been ran over. --If you didn't post this on a forum on the internet, then you would be a smarter person. --If ragnorak could think about something, then he wouldn't fail as much.[/quote'] Lol, I could SO turn this around and tear you a new one. But I'll save it for later. Actually, you can't really turn it around by much. I know that you must have had to let your dog out of the house because he/she probably needed to take a big crap, wandered into the street and then got hit. The real message was actually the third one. So, pay more attention to that one. Oh well, I already knew that, but now you have given me a reason too =D --If you didn't the let the dog out of the house, then he wouldn't have been ran over. The dog was in the backyard, doing her daily duties (I didn't let her out). The guy drove through are backyard and pinned my dog to the tree. --If the drunk man never drove home, then the dog wouldn't have been ran over. um.. No s***, really? I suppose the tooth fairy isn't real either? --If you didn't post this on a forum on the internet, then you would be a smarter person. As opposed to what? One who complains about everything and constantly wines and how bad his life sucks? I'll take ignorance over you, ANY DAY. Nice, drama on a childrens site against me now! Sounds like fun. How about this... Move on,The Drunk guy was an idiot. Would it help if I said I had no sympathy for you? Wow, it takes you forever to catch on to the drift of things. I moved on the minute I posted this thread. Where the hell have you been? Again, I am not looking for sympathy. Besides, we all know that if were you that this happened to, there would 3 new poems from you dedicated to your dog, a love song, and a pro obituary. Actually, my old dog passed away last week. Did anyone online hear about that til now? No, because I have the understanding to keep my private life off the forums now. Apparently not with you. If you didn't post this thread to get sympathy then what did you post it for? Post count? Spam? And if it takes you the idea of posting a thread about it to move on from it then you have some pretty poor ways of moving on. Wow, all this time, and you have still yet to figure out that what I ever I post is for the sole purpose of raising my post count. Tisk, Tisk, Tisk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.