Let's change the game

[Partangle the Candle Jangler]

I just made these cards for....I don't really know. I just think that with Synchros and Xyz the game has become dull. I want to make some changes. I'll probably add more soon. Here they are. Tell me what you think.

 

 

 

[Valkyrus]

I just made these cards for....I don't really know. I just think that with Synchros and Xyz the game has become dull. I want to make some changes. I'll probably add more soon. Here they are. Tell me what you think.

 

 

 

 

First card is beyond useless. Your other cards don't even support it.

Second is beyond broken. Banishing all your opponent's Extra Deck by tribute summoning 1 monster with 1 tribute? Yeah, no.

 

Super Combustion? Again, very very very broken. If that first card was supposed to work with this..well...it still doesn't make it a bit useful, because if this thing existed people would banish 4 monsters with 0 atk and 1 with 300.

 

Last one? Useless.. Isn't worth the cost. And the LP gain is also insignificant.

 

You really need to work on balancing your cards, because currently they're either too OP'ed or too UP'ed.

They would do nothing but make the game worse.

 

Also, reporting you for that sig.

[ragnarok1945]

I don't get what's the deal with your negative stats on the first card

 

2nd card I guess can work well, although I'm curious why you said only synchro monsters.

 

the extra deck contains more than just synchros you know

 

for the Battle continues, half your LP for a direct attack with a normal monster doesn't seem worth it

 

plus 100 LP gain is virtually nothing

[kevin7653]

ok i will start sorta harshly

1.there are no negative stats

2.the names suck(mostly personal opinion)

3.i'm seeing a lot of bad ocg

4.some of these effects are impossible to pull off

5.i dont think synchros can go into a extra deck

6.there not overly horrible(4.7/10)

[Valkyrus]

ok i will start sorta harshly

1.there are no negative stats

2.the names suck(mostly personal opinion)

3.i'm seeing a lot of bad ocg

4.some of these effects are impossible to pull off

5.i dont think synchros can go into a extra deck

6.there not overly horrible(4.7/10)

 

Okay, I will start sorta harshly too. Are you stupid?

The OCG is fine, NONE of the effects are impossible to pull off, though they ARE broken.

OF COURSE Synchros go in the Extra, where the heck do you think they go?

 

You better learn to play the game before commenting, seriously..

[Astolfo]

ok i will start sorta harshly

1.there are no negative stats There hasn't been those kind of cards before I think, but that doesn't mean you're not allowed to.

2.the names suck(mostly personal opinion) So? That's your opinion, and frankly, I haven't seen your cards having any better names. Operative words: personal opinion

3.i'm seeing a lot of bad ocg So? Your OCG isn't good either. It takes time to get used to it. The longer you make cards and listen to CONSTRUCTIVE criticism, the better you get. Mine isn't the best either, and I've been here longer than most people. (Signup date)

4.some of these effects are impossible to pull off Which effects?

5.i dont think synchros can go into a extra deck Then where do they go? If you bother to look around, Synchros can only go into Extra/Side.

6.there not overly horrible(4.7/10) They are kind of OP'd for some, but I see the reasoning. I would give him an overall average of about 7-8/10. 4.7 is harsh. Think about yours. Most of yours are about 3-5/10.

 

@Enguin:

 

Altek: Can see how this works with Super Combustion but why not make it 0 then? It's still ok if it's 0. Overall, kind of weak. 5/10

Hassentani: Ok, I guess, but maybe up to number of Sync's destroyed? 8/10

Super Combustion of the Minor Powers: Ok, not too OP'd. 9/10

The Battle Continues: Might be a bit too much gain for LP. 9/10

 

31/40

 

Check out the new OCG thread linked in the RC help thread. Also, those confusing colons/semicolons go like this. From a quote I asked about on Q+A which evilfusion answered:

It's fairly simple, once you understand.

A colon indicates that the text before it is a Trigger or Activation Condition.

For example:

"When a monster is Normal Summoned: Draw 1 card"

A semi-colon indicates that the text before it is done after activation, but before resolution, such as targeting or costs.

For example:

"Once per turn: Discard 1 card and target 1 Level 4 monster in your Graveyard; Special Summon that target"

If a card has a colon OR a semi-colon, that effect starts a chain.

So again, It goes Condition (colon) Cost/Targeting (semi-colon) resolution

[Partangle the Candle Jangler]

OK so now I have a lot of stuff to reply to (this might will be along post........

 

First card is beyond useless. Your other cards don't even support it.

Second is beyond broken. Banishing all your opponent's Extra Deck by tribute summoning 1 monster with 1 tribute? Yeah, no.

 

Super Combustion? Again, very very very broken. If that first card was supposed to work with this..well...it still doesn't make it a bit useful, because if this thing existed people would banish 4 monsters with 0 atk and 1 with 300.

 

Last one? Useless.. Isn't worth the cost. And the LP gain is also insignificant.

 

You really need to work on balancing your cards, because currently they're either too OP'ed or too UP'ed.

They would do nothing but make the game worse.

 

Also, reporting you for that sig.

 

1) First card will not be "beyond useless" once I post the next three cards and you see what it was meant for.

2) I do not recall that you only need one tribute for a level 7 monster, would you care to explain to me when they completely overhauled tribute summoning?

3) Why is Super Combustion very broken? How many decks are used these days that actually have 5 monsters with 0 ATK?

4) Last one is not useless as obviously it is not intended for when you have over 1500 Life Points. It's for late game e.g. if you're using a deck with mostly normal monsters (Like my Level 3 one on DN) and it's near the end both of you on say 800 Life. Play this, pay half, attack directly, win. It's situational yes but a LOT of cards are (Ojama Delta Hurricane, with around a 1 in a billion chance of ever using it, or all the old anti-cards like Call of The Grave, Anti-Raegeki, White Hole).

5) Why report me, why does it matter...."Please Stop Ragging". What does that even mean?

6) Why the hell did you quote the whole thing?

 

 

I don't get what's the deal with your negative stats on the first card

 

2nd card I guess can work well, although I'm curious why you said only synchro monsters.

 

the extra deck contains more than just synchros you know

 

for the Battle continues, half your LP for a direct attack with a normal monster doesn't seem worth it

 

plus 100 LP gain is virtually nothing

 

1) Negative stats are for one of the next 3 cards as said above.

2)The reason I just said Synchros is because they fill me with hate when I see somebody summon one, but mainly because I want to punish the people who use them.

3)As above for Battle Continues. 100 Life is insignificant yes. I had it at 300 initially then 200 but decided to just put it at 100 to keep it from affecting the card overall.

 

 

ok i will start sorta harshly

1.there are no negative stats

2.the names suck(mostly personal opinion)

3.i'm seeing a lot of bad ocg

4.some of these effects are impossible to pull off

5.i dont think synchros can go into a extra deck

6.there not overly horrible(4.7/10)

 

1) Exactly.

2) I do not care.

3) I have no idea how to word the effects I'm going for.

4) Which ones/ Why?

5) That's so stupid it does not merit a reply.

6) You gave no praise or positives and you said you would start sort of harshly, not go the whole way through in that manner.

 

 

@Enguin:

 

Altek: Can see how this works with Super Combustion but why not make it 0 then? It's still ok if it's 0. Overall, kind of weak. 5/10

Hassentani: Ok, I guess, but maybe up to number of Sync's destroyed? 8/10

Super Combustion of the Minor Powers: Ok, not too OP'd. 9/10

The Battle Continues: Might be a bit too much gain for LP. 9/10

 

31/40

 

Check out the new OCG thread linked in the RC help thread. Also, those confusing colons/semicolons go like this. From a quote I asked about on Q+A which evilfusion answered:

 

1) As said before.

2) That is what I meant to say, I will change it.

3) Thank you for noticing.

4) How the hell is 100 per Synchro or Xyz too much?

 

OK SO THAT TOOK A WHILE. HAPPY READING.

[kevin7653]

OK so now I have a lot of stuff to reply to (this might will be along post........

 

 

 

1) First card will not be "beyond useless" once I post the next three cards and you see what it was meant for.

2) I do not recall that you only need one tribute for a level 7 monster, would you care to explain to me when they completely overhauled tribute summoning?

3) Why is Super Combustion very broken? How many decks are used these days that actually have 5 monsters with 0 ATK?

4) Last one is not useless as obviously it is not intended for when you have over 1500 Life Points. It's for late game e.g. if you're using a deck with mostly normal monsters (Like my Level 3 one on DN) and it's near the end both of you on say 800 Life. Play this, pay half, attack directly, win. It's situational yes but a LOT of cards are (Ojama Delta Hurricane, with around a 1 in a billion chance of ever using it, or all the old anti-cards like Call of The Grave, Anti-Raegeki, White Hole).

5) Why report me, why does it matter...."Please Stop Ragging". What does that even mean?

6) Why the hell did you quote the whole thing?

 

 

 

 

1) Negative stats are for one of the next 3 cards as said above.

2)The reason I just said Synchros is because they fill me with hate when I see somebody summon one, but mainly because I want to punish the people who use them.

3)As above for Battle Continues. 100 Life is insignificant yes. I had it at 300 initially then 200 but decided to just put it at 100 to keep it from affecting the card overall.

 

 

 

 

1) Exactly.

2) I do not care.

3) I have no idea how to word the effects I'm going for.

4) Which ones/ Why?

5) That's so stupid it does not merit a reply.

6) You gave no praise or positives and you said you would start sort of harshly, not go the whole way through in that manner.

 

 

 

 

1) As said before.

2) That is what I meant to say, I will change it.

3) Thank you for noticing.

4) How the hell is 100 per Synchro or Xyz too much?

 

OK SO THAT TOOK A WHILE. HAPPY READING.

@Enguin:

 

Altek: Can see how this works with Super Combustion but why not make it 0 then? It's still ok if it's 0. Overall, kind of weak. 5/10

Hassentani: Ok, I guess, but maybe up to number of Sync's destroyed? 8/10

Super Combustion of the Minor Powers: Ok, not too OP'd. 9/10

The Battle Continues: Might be a bit too much gain for LP. 9/10

 

31/40

 

Check out the new OCG thread linked in the RC help thread. Also, those confusing colons/semicolons go like this. From a quote I asked about on Q+A which evilfusion answered:

Okay, I will start sorta harshly too. Are you stupid?

The OCG is fine, NONE of the effects are impossible to pull off, though they ARE broken.

OF COURSE Synchros go in the Extra, where the heck do you think they go?

 

You better learn to play the game before commenting, seriously..

im gald you guys like my reveiw:)

[Valkyrus]

OK so now I have a lot of stuff to reply to (this might will be along post........

 

 

 

1) First card will not be "beyond useless" once I post the next three cards and you see what it was meant for.

2) I do not recall that you only need one tribute for a level 7 monster, would you care to explain to me when they completely overhauled tribute summoning?

3) Why is Super Combustion very broken? How many decks are used these days that actually have 5 monsters with 0 ATK?

4) Last one is not useless as obviously it is not intended for when you have over 1500 Life Points. It's for late game e.g. if you're using a deck with mostly normal monsters (Like my Level 3 one on DN) and it's near the end both of you on say 800 Life. Play this, pay half, attack directly, win. It's situational yes but a LOT of cards are (Ojama Delta Hurricane, with around a 1 in a billion chance of ever using it, or all the old anti-cards like Call of The Grave, Anti-Raegeki, White Hole).

5) Why report me, why does it matter...."Please Stop Ragging". What does that even mean?

6) Why the hell did you quote the whole thing?

 

 

1) For now it's beyond useless. And cards like that don't even exist, so their place isn't in realistic cards. Even if you make support, it'd still be useless.

2) my bad, thought it was level 6. It still doesn't matter, it's broken as hell. If you can't see it, it's your problem. Card is seriously bad.

3) many decks will be used if this card existed. Besides there are many good cards with 0 atk, it doesn't justify this card's brokenness one bit.

4) Still useless.

5) because it's hating on another forum member. And that's forbidden on this forum. And if you don't know what your own sig means....

6) because I decided to? What do you care?

[Sander]

Look, people will call a card like the first one useless if you will not specify that you're going to post support cards for it.

 

Last one is not useless as obviously it is not intended for when you have over 1500 Life Points. It's for late game e.g. if you're using a deck with mostly normal monsters (Like my Level 3 one on DN) and it's near the end both of you on say 800 Life. Play this, pay half, attack directly, win. It's situational yes but a LOT of cards are (Ojama Delta Hurricane, with around a 1 in a billion chance of ever using it, or all the old anti-cards like Call of The Grave, Anti-Raegeki, White Hole).

 

The Battle Continues is an useless card, because it's too situational to be useful. Really, even if it's designed to be used late game, what use will it have if it's stuck in your hand when it's not late game? AND really, Ojama Delta Hurricane isn't situational, because you can actually pull it off easily. And did you really have to use anti-cards as an example? Anybody with any understanding of this game and its history should understand that those cards were made in the era of YuGiOh when it was still experimental.

 

The Battle Continues is, as I stated before, useless, because it's a dead draw most of the time, and even if you use it, you're not going to win, because you are at 1500 or below for a good reason.

[kevin7653]

so as it seems everyone agrees that these cards are pretty much horrible/brroken

no offence

[Guest .Rai]

To be honest, the "Please Stop Ragging" was just an extreme way of saying: "The majority of RC is kinda stupid. Take ragnarok for example."

 

Not really hating, just pointing out 1 particular example when you look at it.

 

The Normal Monster is horrible. Implementing negative stats is pure confusion. Not only does it mean the game will need a combat overhaul, but it's just bad. Introducing weird and confusing mechanics are just bad for the game in general.

 

Hassentani is stupid. Until one single person gives me a single reason why they hate Synchros, or how they 'fill them with hate', or how they are 'stupid', should just be quiet really. Synchros have been balanced out a great deal now, and there's no reason to hate on them. It's just broken due to it breaking out certain mechanics.

 

Super Combustion is broken. Chaos Emperor Dragon was banned for a reason. It nuked the hand and basically gave you an instant way of keeping advantage presuming you were doing it correctly. Not only that, but this actually gives you a free beatstick. Really not good card design at all for something so costless and powerful. There is no way of balancing it and should be scrapped.

 

The Battle Continues is just bad. At that state, with only Normal monsters, you are most likely going to win anyway. Paying Life Points so radically is only for countering moves rather than pushing through with a couple extra Life Points.

 

And, yes, OCG is quite off at times. And, they are bad. So Gandorator and フォトン・ロクサス were, for the majority, wrong.

[Partangle the Candle Jangler]

Look, people will call a card like the first one useless if you will not specify that you're going to post support cards for it.

 

 

Yeah but I did say I'd be adding more cards so y'know use your head

[Guest .Rai]

 

 

Yeah but I did say I'd be adding more cards so y'know use your head

 

But it's bad for the game, and irrelevant whether it's good or bad.

[kevin7653]

i agree

[Partangle the Candle Jangler]

Looking at these now.........

They are sucky.

in my defense I had been awake for like 16 hours when I made them and it was late. Some of the effects are as some most have said, beyond saving. I think I'm just gonna delete this thread and we can all forget it ever happened -_-

[Sander]

Yeah but I did say I'd be adding more cards so y'know use your head

 

You said it AFTER people pointed it out. Maybe you should use YOUR head before you start trying to hint that I'm not thinking. And lawl, you think you can delete threads?

[Partangle the Candle Jangler]

Oh how I wish I could delete this. Everything I've said has been stupid and made me seem like a jackass. Jesus this thread crashed and burned. Any admin please delete it.

[Sander]

Oh how I wish I could delete this. Everything I've said has been stupid and made me seem like a jackass. Jesus this thread crashed and burned. Any admin please delete it.

 

The best you can do is to get a moderator to lock this thread, because the admins do not really deal with petty things like deleting threads (they really don't do anything in the forum, don't keep contact with the members etc. etc.)

[kevin7653]

Oh how I wish I could pin this. Everything I've said has been awsome and made me seem like a angel. Jesus loves me most because this thread is totally awsome. Any admin please pin it.

i wouldn't exatly say that

[Ieyasu Tokugawa]

The best you can do is to get a moderator to lock this thread, because the admins do not really deal with petty things like deleting threads (they really don't do anything in the forum, don't keep contact with the members etc. etc.)

We can delete threads too you know? ^^

[Sander]

i wouldn't exatly say that

 

The hell are you even trying to accomplish here, kevin?

 

We can delete threads too you know? ^^

 

THEN WHY HAVEN'T YOU, HMMM?

[Ieyasu Tokugawa]

THEN WHY HAVEN'T YOU, HMMM?

There's no reason to :D

[kevin7653]

The hell are you even trying to accomplish here, kevin?

 

 

 

THEN WHY HAVEN'T YOU, HMMM?

I'm am trying to acomplish...nothing...or maybe making myself look like a fool

There's no reason to :D

the man has asked you to nicley now

[Sander]

There's no reason to :D

 

Lawl, yeah. TheGreatEnguin, this thread will forever haunt you...forever haunted?